A Methodology to Map Ecosystem Functions to Support Ecosystem Services Assessments

被引:43
|
作者
Petter, Mik [1 ]
Mooney, Shannon [1 ]
Maynard, Simone M. [1 ,2 ]
Davidson, Andrew [1 ]
Cox, Melanie [3 ]
Horosak, Ila [4 ]
机构
[1] SEQ Catchments, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[2] Australian Natl Univ, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
[3] Powerlink Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[4] Griffith Univ, Nathan, Qld 4111, Australia
来源
ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY | 2013年 / 18卷 / 01期
关键词
ecosystem functions; ecosystem services; GIS mapping; land use planning; South East Queensland; SALT-MARSH; NUTRIENT ENRICHMENT; BANK EROSION; LAND-USE; CONSERVATION; AUSTRALIA; RESTORATION; DISTURBANCE; VALUATION; RIPARIAN;
D O I
10.5751/ES-05260-180131
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The project developed and trialed a method of mapping ecosystem functions in South East Queensland using biophysical data layers in preference to land use surrogates. Biophysical data and surrogates were identified for 19 ecosystem functions and maps were produced for each. Data layers for each ecosystem function were standardized for mapping purposes using existing expert advice or data quantiling. Two versions of the total ecosystem function overlap maps were also produced, showing areas of high ecosystem function that have the potential to contribute to high ecosystem service provision. This method was successfully used to replace land use surrogates in most cases, and produced maps that planners and decision makers considered credible. The mapping exercise allowed an ecosystem services framework (the SEQ Ecosystem Services Framework) to be embedded in a statutory planning document, used in a State of the Region Report and to influence planning decisions at a local government level.
引用
收藏
页数:35
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Putting people on the map improves the prioritization of ecosystem services
    Keeler, Bonnie L.
    Dalzell, Brent J.
    Gourevitch, Jesse D.
    Hawthorne, Peter L.
    Johnson, Kris A.
    Noe, Ryan R.
    FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 17 (03) : 151 - 156
  • [22] Ecosystem functions and ecosystem values
    Whigham, DF
    ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION AND HUMAN ACTIVITIES: RECONCILING ECONOMICS AND ECOLOGY, 1997, : 225 - 239
  • [23] Integrating Ecosystem Services into Risk Assessments for Drinking Water Protection
    Gaertner, Nadine
    Lindhe, Andreas
    Wahtra, Julia
    Soederqvist, Tore
    Lang, Lars-Ove
    Nordzell, Henrik
    Norrman, Jenny
    Rosen, Lars
    WATER, 2022, 14 (08)
  • [24] A New Collaborative Methodology for Assessment and Management of Ecosystem Services
    Segura, Marina
    Maroto, Concepcion
    Belton, Valerie
    Ginestar, Concepcion
    FORESTS, 2015, 6 (05): : 1696 - 1720
  • [25] Integrating ecosystem services in Swedish environmental assessments: an empirical analysis
    Hansen, Karin
    Malmaeus, Mikael
    Hasselstroem, Linus
    Lindblom, Erik
    Noren, Katja
    Olshammar, Mikael
    Soederqvist, Tore
    Soutukorva, Asa
    IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND PROJECT APPRAISAL, 2018, 36 (03) : 253 - 264
  • [26] The future of crowd-sourced cultural ecosystem services assessments
    Langemeyer, Johannes
    Ghermandi, Andrea
    Keeler, Bonnie
    van Berkel, Derek
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2023, 60
  • [27] A triage approach to improve the relevance of marine ecosystem services assessments
    Pendleton, Linwood
    Mongruel, Remi
    Beaumont, Nicola
    Hooper, Tara
    Charles, Mahe
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 2015, 530 : 183 - 193
  • [28] How Mediterranean Ecosystem Deals with Wildfire Impact on Soil Ecosystem Services and Functions: A Review
    Francos, Marcos
    Colino-Prieto, Fernando
    Sanchez-Garcia, Carlos
    LAND, 2024, 13 (04)
  • [29] Ecosystem service assessments across cascade levels: typology and an evidence map
    Wang, Zhuangzhuang
    Fu, Bojie
    Zhang, Liwei
    Wu, Xutong
    Li, Yingjie
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2022, 57
  • [30] Linking ecosystem processes and ecosystem services
    Fu, Bojie
    Wang, Shuai
    Su, Changhong
    Forsius, Martin
    CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2013, 5 (01) : 4 - 10