How is the ecosystem services concept used as a tool to foster collaborative ecosystem governance? A systematic map protocol

被引:1
|
作者
Holzer, Jennifer M. [1 ]
Hobbs, Imogen [2 ]
Baird, Julia [1 ,3 ]
Hickey, Gordon [2 ]
机构
[1] Brock Univ, Environm Sustainabil Res Ctr, 1812 Sir Isaac Brock Way, St Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Dept Nat Resource Sci, 21111 Lakeshore Rd, Ste Anne De Bellevue, PQ H9X 3V9, Canada
[3] Brock Univ, Dept Geog & Tourism Studies, 1812 Sir Isaac Brock Way, St Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Natural capital; Process; Stakeholder; Boundary object; Management; Governance; ENVIRONMENTAL GOVERNANCE; STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT; POLICY; REVIEWS; LESSONS; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1186/s13750-022-00278-8
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Background: While the concept of ecosystem services has been widely adopted by scholars and increasingly used in policy and practice, there has been criticism of its usefulness to decision-makers. This systematic map will collect and analyse literature that frames ES as a collaboration tool, rather than as an ecosystem assessment tool, to answer the research question-how is the ecosystem services concept used as a tool to foster collaborative ecosystem governance and management? Methods: We will search for publications using designated keywords in Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus, grey literature and conservation practitioner databases and websites. The search strategy aims to locate all ecosystem services studies related to collaboration and joint activities. After removing duplicates, we will screen papers in two stages-first by reviewing titles and abstracts and then by reviewing full text. Both stages will screen papers according to the following inclusion criteria: (1) the study is situated in the context of or related to environmental governance or management; (2) the study focuses on ecosystem services being used as a tool for collaboration; (3) the study describes a process resulting from applying the ecosystem services concept as a tool or approach; and (4) the ecosystem services concept is used in the study in a collaboration or group process in a substantial manner. We will exclude papers that do not address the ES concept as a process tool or approach or that use the ecosystem services concept to directly influence specific decisions or policy. Eligible studies will be critically appraised to assess their reporting quality. Studies will then be reviewed to determine: (a) the type of tool or mechanism that is the primary focus or example of the paper, (b) the rationale for using the ES concept, (c) whether a tool or approach was empirically tested in the study, (d) what the study found regarding the usefulness of ES as a tool or approach, and (e) any challenges to their use, if mentioned explicitly. A standard coding spreadsheet will be used by reviewers. Relevant metadata will be extracted for each paper assessed and used to construct an open-access online database. Finally, a narrative synthesis of metadata will be reported based on eligible studies.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] How is the ecosystem services concept used as a tool to foster collaborative ecosystem governance? A systematic map protocol
    Jennifer M. Holzer
    Imogen Hobbs
    Julia Baird
    Gordon Hickey
    [J]. Environmental Evidence, 11
  • [2] What evidence exists on how changes in marine ecosystem structure and functioning affect ecosystem services delivery? A systematic map protocol
    Campagne, C. Sylvie
    Langridge, Joseph
    Claudet, Joachim
    Mongruel, Remi
    Thiebaut, Eric
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL EVIDENCE, 2021, 10 (01)
  • [3] What evidence exists on how changes in marine ecosystem structure and functioning affect ecosystem services delivery? A systematic map protocol
    C. Sylvie Campagne
    Joseph Langridge
    Joachim Claudet
    Rémi Mongruel
    Eric Thiébaut
    [J]. Environmental Evidence, 10
  • [4] Comparative Fortunes of Ecosystem Services as an International Governance Concept
    Allan, Jen Iris
    Auld, Graeme
    Cadman, Timothy
    Stevenson, Hayley
    [J]. GLOBAL POLICY, 2022, 13 (01) : 62 - 75
  • [5] What are the local impacts of energy systems on marine ecosystem services: a systematic map protocol
    Papathanasopoulou, Eleni
    Queiros, Ana M.
    Beaumont, Nicola
    Hooper, Tara
    Nunes, Joana
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL EVIDENCE, 2014, 3 (01):
  • [6] A Dispersed Park as a Tool for Realizing the Concept of Ecosystem Services
    Churiakova, T. A.
    Mishsina, M. E.
    Mityagin, S. A.
    [J]. ADVANCED RESEARCH IN TECHNOLOGIES, INFORMATION, INNOVATION AND SUSTAINABILITY, ARTIIS 2022, PT II, 2022, 1676 : 85 - 96
  • [7] How effective are on-farm conservation land management strategies for preserving ecosystem services in developing countries? A systematic map protocol
    Thorn J.
    Snaddon J.
    Waldron A.
    Kok K.
    Zhou W.
    Bhagwat S.
    Willis K.
    Petrokofsky G.
    [J]. Environmental Evidence, 4 (1)
  • [8] A systematic map of ecosystem services assessments around European agroforestry
    Fagerholm, Nora
    Torralba, Mario
    Burgess, Paul J.
    Plieninger, Tobias
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2016, 62 : 47 - 65
  • [9] EnviroAtlas: A new geospatial tool to foster ecosystem services science and resource management
    Pickard, Brian R.
    Daniel, Jessica
    Mehaffey, Megan
    Jackson, Laura E.
    Neale, Anne
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2015, 14 : 45 - 55
  • [10] Emergy as a Tool to Evaluate Ecosystem Services: A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Nadalini, Ana Carolina V.
    Kalid, Ricardo de Araujo
    Torres, Ednildo Andrade
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (13)