Awareness, attitudes and perspectives of direct-to-consumer genetic testing in Greece: a survey of potential consumers

被引:16
|
作者
Mavroidopoulou, Vasiliki [1 ]
Xera, Ellie [1 ]
Mollaki, Vasiliki [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Technol Educ Inst Athens, Fac Hlth & Caring Profess, Dept Med Labs, Athens, Greece
[2] Hellen Natl Bioeth Commiss, Athens 10674, Greece
关键词
EXPERIENCES; GENOMICS;
D O I
10.1038/jhg.2015.58
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTCGT) is now offered by numerous companies. The present survey aimed to explore awareness, interest, reasons to take and refuse DTCGT, and understanding of results amongst 725 higher education students in Greece. A third of the responders were aware of DTCGT and interest was dependent on cost. More than 60% of the participants would undergo DTCGT to learn more about their health, to warn their children, so that their doctor can monitor their health and change their lifestyle. Nevertheless, they would prefer to consult their doctor first and expressed concerned about their personal data. After receiving results from a hypothetical DTC genetic test predicting higher risk for colon cancer, 59.5% of the responders thought that they could understand the results but 46.1% believed that the results have diagnostic value. In total, 83.6% of the participants would ask their doctor to explain the results and 70.4% would discuss results with their family. In conclusion, the majority of higher education students in Greece appreciate the benefits of genetic testing but with the involvement of their doctor. A physician's participation in the process and informing the public about the true value of genetic testing, are crucial to avoid misinterpretation of DTCGT results.
引用
收藏
页码:515 / 523
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Direct-to-consumer genetic testing - clinical considerations
    Trent, Ronald J.
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2013, 198 (09) : 496 - 498
  • [42] Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: Reliable or Risky?
    Spencer, David H.
    Lockwood, Christina
    Topol, Eric
    Evans, James P.
    Green, Robert C.
    Mansfield, Elizabeth
    Tezak, Zivana
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2011, 57 (12) : 1641 - 1644
  • [43] DIRECT-TO-CONSUMER GENETIC TESTING: ETHICAL-LEGAL PERSPECTIVES AND PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS
    Tamir, Sivan
    MEDICAL LAW REVIEW, 2010, 18 (02) : 213 - 238
  • [44] Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: Value and Risk
    Majumder, Mary A.
    Guerrini, Christi J.
    McGuire, Amy L.
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF MEDICINE, VOL 72, 2021, 2021, 72 : 151 - 166
  • [45] Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing for Domestic Cats
    Lyons, Leslie A.
    Buckley, Reuben M.
    VETERINARY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA-SMALL ANIMAL PRACTICE, 2020, 50 (05) : 991 - +
  • [46] Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: driving choice?
    Knoppers, Bartha Maria
    Avard, Denise
    Howard, Heidi Carmen
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2010, 10 (08) : 965 - 968
  • [47] The ethical challenges of direct-to-consumer genetic testing
    Berg, Cheryl
    Fryer-Edwards, Kelly
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2008, 77 (01) : 17 - 31
  • [48] Direct-to-consumer DNA genetic testing and the GP
    Trent, Ronald
    AUSTRALIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2014, 43 (07) : 436 - 439
  • [49] Direct-to-consumer genetic testing - a regulatory nightmare?
    Nicol, Dianne
    Hagger, Meredith
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2013, 198 (09) : 501 - 502
  • [50] Direct-to-consumer advertising of genetic testing - Reply
    Gollust, SE
    Hull, SC
    Wilfond, B
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 289 (01): : 46 - 46