Awareness, attitudes and perspectives of direct-to-consumer genetic testing in Greece: a survey of potential consumers

被引:16
|
作者
Mavroidopoulou, Vasiliki [1 ]
Xera, Ellie [1 ]
Mollaki, Vasiliki [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Technol Educ Inst Athens, Fac Hlth & Caring Profess, Dept Med Labs, Athens, Greece
[2] Hellen Natl Bioeth Commiss, Athens 10674, Greece
关键词
EXPERIENCES; GENOMICS;
D O I
10.1038/jhg.2015.58
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTCGT) is now offered by numerous companies. The present survey aimed to explore awareness, interest, reasons to take and refuse DTCGT, and understanding of results amongst 725 higher education students in Greece. A third of the responders were aware of DTCGT and interest was dependent on cost. More than 60% of the participants would undergo DTCGT to learn more about their health, to warn their children, so that their doctor can monitor their health and change their lifestyle. Nevertheless, they would prefer to consult their doctor first and expressed concerned about their personal data. After receiving results from a hypothetical DTC genetic test predicting higher risk for colon cancer, 59.5% of the responders thought that they could understand the results but 46.1% believed that the results have diagnostic value. In total, 83.6% of the participants would ask their doctor to explain the results and 70.4% would discuss results with their family. In conclusion, the majority of higher education students in Greece appreciate the benefits of genetic testing but with the involvement of their doctor. A physician's participation in the process and informing the public about the true value of genetic testing, are crucial to avoid misinterpretation of DTCGT results.
引用
收藏
页码:515 / 523
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Direct-to-consumer testing: if consumers are not anxious, why are policymakers?
    Timothy Caulfield
    Human Genetics, 2011, 130 : 23 - 25
  • [32] Medical students' knowledge of, experiences with, and attitudes towards direct-to-consumer genetic testing
    Gordon, Laurel
    Wasson, Katherine
    Li, Mindy
    MOLECULAR GENETICS AND METABOLISM, 2021, 132 : S293 - S294
  • [33] Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: Access and marketing
    McCabe, LL
    McCabe, ERB
    GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2004, 6 (01) : 58 - 59
  • [34] Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: Interdisciplinary Crossroads
    Stein, Richard A.
    JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH, 2012, 5 (01) : 35 - 67
  • [35] Predictors of interest in direct-to-consumer genetic testing
    Sweeny, Kate
    Legg, Angela M.
    PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 2011, 26 (10) : 1259 - 1272
  • [36] Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a bibliometric analysis
    Xavier, Bracke
    McVeigh, T. P.
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 190 (SUPPL 2) : 73 - 73
  • [37] Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Comprehensive Review
    Jiang, Sharon
    Liberti, Lawrence
    Lebo, David
    THERAPEUTIC INNOVATION & REGULATORY SCIENCE, 2023, 57 (6) : 1190 - 1198
  • [38] European citizens' perspectives on direct-to-consumer genetic testing: an updated systematic review
    Hoxhaj, Ilda
    Stojanovic, Jovana
    Boccia, Stefania
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 33 (05): : 947 - 953
  • [39] The Ethical Challenges of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing
    Cheryl Berg
    Kelly Fryer-Edwards
    Journal of Business Ethics, 2008, 77 : 17 - 31
  • [40] The ethics and regulation of direct-to-consumer genetic testing
    Paula Boddington
    Genome Medicine, 1