MP1 AND MAIA FUNDUS PERIMETRY IN HEALTHY SUBJECTS AND PATIENTS AFFECTED BY RETINAL DYSTROPHIES

被引:32
|
作者
Parodi, Maurizio Battaglia [1 ]
Triolo, Giacinto [1 ]
Morales, Marco [2 ]
Borrelli, Enrico [1 ]
Cicinelli, Maria V. [1 ]
Cascavilla, Maria L. [1 ]
Bandello, Francesco [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vita Salute, Dept Ophthalmol, San Raffaele Sci Inst, I-20132 Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Nottingham, Div Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
关键词
microperimetry; retinal dystrophies; SENSITIVITY;
D O I
10.1097/IAE.0000000000000504
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose:To compare retinal sensitivity obtained with MP1 and MAIA microperimeters in patients affected by retinal dystrophies (RD) and in healthy subjects.Methods:Thirty-six patients affected by RD and 25 healthy subjects were considered for the study. All patients and controls underwent a complete ophthalmic examination including fundus-related perimetry, performed by means of two microperimeters, the MP1 (Nidek Technologies) and the MAIA (CenterVue). Main outcome of the study was the comparison of retinal sensitivity. Such comparison was performed converting the MP1 decibel (dB) values to their MAIA equivalent dB values.Results:Mean retinal sensitivity in patients affected by RD was 5.68 6.08 dB (mean +/- SD) on MP1 (9.66 +/- 10.06 dB converted to their equivalent MAIA values) and 14.66 +/- 9.37 dB on MAIA (P < 0.0001). Mean retinal sensitivity in healthy subjects was 18.46 +/- 3.10 dB on MP1 (22.44 +/- 7.08 dB on their converted equivalent MAIA values) and 28.52 +/- 1.12 dB on MAIA (P < 0.0001). Thirty eyes affected by RD (41%) showed retinal areas characterized by sensitivity under 1 dB on MP1, whereas the MAIA examination of the same areas revealed a mean retinal sensitivity of 4.7 dB. Moreover, 28 of these eyes disclosed also areas of absolute scotoma on MP1, but examining the same areas on MAIA, just 13 of these eyes (46%) disclosed an absolute scotoma. In addition, in a subgroup of 6 eyes affected by RD (8%) showing a retinal sensitivity of 20 dB on MP1, the corresponding value on MAIA varied from 26.3 dB to 30.0 dB, with a mean value of 27.8 +/- 1.3 dB.Conclusion:The MAIA microperimeter provides a more accurate characterization of functional impairment in RD with respect to the MP1 system, especially in cases with low and high retinal sensitivity. MAIA microperimeter could reveal particularly useful in precisely identifying and monitoring subtle changes in retinal sensitivity, especially in view of the availability of therapies aiming at a functional rescue in patients with RD.
引用
收藏
页码:1662 / 1669
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Defects of the Tpo-receptor, Mp1, caused by mutations found in CAMT patients.
    Tijssen, MR
    di Summa, F
    Van den Oudenrijn, S
    Voermans, C
    Van der Schoot, CE
    Zwaginga, JJ
    De Haas, M
    BLOOD, 2005, 106 (11) : 616A - 616A
  • [32] Cold Stress and Nitrogen Deficiency Affected Protein Expression of Psychrotrophic Dyadobacter psychrophilus B2 and Pseudomonas jessenii MP1
    Suyal, Deep C.
    Kumar, Saurabh
    Yadav, Amit
    Shouche, Yogesh
    Goel, Reeta
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2017, 8 : 430
  • [33] Range of Retinal Thicknesses in Healthy Subjects Compared to ADOA-Patients
    Eckmann, Christina Lysholm
    Li, Xiao Qiang
    Ronnback, Ceciia
    Sander, Birgit
    Larsen, Michael
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2017, 58 (08)
  • [34] Correlation of cone spacing with retinal thickness and microperimetry in patients with inherited retinal degenerations and healthy subjects
    Foote, Katharina G.
    De la Huerta, Irina
    Gustafson, Kevin
    Baldwin, Angela
    Zayit-Soudry, Shiri
    Qin, Jia
    Rinella, Nicholas
    Porco, Travis C.
    Roorda, Austin
    Duncan, Jacque L.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2017, 58 (08)
  • [35] Phenotypic variability in patients with retinal dystrophies due to mutations in CRB1
    Henderson, Robert H.
    Mackay, Donna S.
    Li, Zheng
    Moradi, Phillip
    Sergouniotis, Panagiotis
    Russell-Eggitt, Isabelle
    Thompson, Dorothy A.
    Robson, Anthony G.
    Holder, Graham E.
    Webster, Andrew R.
    Moore, Anthony T.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2011, 95 (06) : 811 - 817
  • [36] TREND database: Retinal images of healthy young subjects visualized by a portable digital non-mydriatic fundus camera
    Popovic, Natasa
    Vujosevic, Stela
    Radunovic, Miroslav
    Radunovic, Miodrag
    Popovic, Tomo
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (07):
  • [37] Scotopic and photopic macular functions as assessed with microperimetry (MP1) in patients with Stargardt disease type 1-The SMART Study
    Ibrahim, Mohamed A.
    Strauss, Rupert Wolfgang
    Kong, Xiangrong
    Ervin, Ann-Margret
    Ho, Alexander
    Sunness, Janet S.
    Audo, Isabelle S.
    Birch, David G.
    Sadda, Srinivas R.
    Bittencourt, Millena G.
    Scholl, Hendrik P.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2016, 57 (12)
  • [38] Comparison of Electrically Evoked Phosphene Thresholds in Healthy Subjects and Patients With Retinal Diseases
    Naycheva, L.
    Schatz, A.
    Roeck, T.
    Willmann, G.
    Bartz-Schmidt, K. U.
    Zrenner, E.
    Gekeler, F.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2010, 51 (13)
  • [39] Long- and short-term variability of automated perimetry results in patients with optic neuritis and healthy subjects
    Wall, M
    Johnson, CA
    Kutzko, KE
    Nguyen, R
    Brito, C
    Keltner, JL
    ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1998, 116 (01) : 53 - 61
  • [40] Longitudinal analysis of health care costs in patients with childhood onset inherited retinal dystrophies compared to healthy controls
    Line Kessel
    Jakob Kjellberg
    Rikke Ibsen
    Annette Rasmussen
    Kamilla Rothe Nissen
    Morten la Cour
    BMC Ophthalmology, 22