MP1 AND MAIA FUNDUS PERIMETRY IN HEALTHY SUBJECTS AND PATIENTS AFFECTED BY RETINAL DYSTROPHIES

被引:32
|
作者
Parodi, Maurizio Battaglia [1 ]
Triolo, Giacinto [1 ]
Morales, Marco [2 ]
Borrelli, Enrico [1 ]
Cicinelli, Maria V. [1 ]
Cascavilla, Maria L. [1 ]
Bandello, Francesco [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vita Salute, Dept Ophthalmol, San Raffaele Sci Inst, I-20132 Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Nottingham, Div Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
关键词
microperimetry; retinal dystrophies; SENSITIVITY;
D O I
10.1097/IAE.0000000000000504
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose:To compare retinal sensitivity obtained with MP1 and MAIA microperimeters in patients affected by retinal dystrophies (RD) and in healthy subjects.Methods:Thirty-six patients affected by RD and 25 healthy subjects were considered for the study. All patients and controls underwent a complete ophthalmic examination including fundus-related perimetry, performed by means of two microperimeters, the MP1 (Nidek Technologies) and the MAIA (CenterVue). Main outcome of the study was the comparison of retinal sensitivity. Such comparison was performed converting the MP1 decibel (dB) values to their MAIA equivalent dB values.Results:Mean retinal sensitivity in patients affected by RD was 5.68 6.08 dB (mean +/- SD) on MP1 (9.66 +/- 10.06 dB converted to their equivalent MAIA values) and 14.66 +/- 9.37 dB on MAIA (P < 0.0001). Mean retinal sensitivity in healthy subjects was 18.46 +/- 3.10 dB on MP1 (22.44 +/- 7.08 dB on their converted equivalent MAIA values) and 28.52 +/- 1.12 dB on MAIA (P < 0.0001). Thirty eyes affected by RD (41%) showed retinal areas characterized by sensitivity under 1 dB on MP1, whereas the MAIA examination of the same areas revealed a mean retinal sensitivity of 4.7 dB. Moreover, 28 of these eyes disclosed also areas of absolute scotoma on MP1, but examining the same areas on MAIA, just 13 of these eyes (46%) disclosed an absolute scotoma. In addition, in a subgroup of 6 eyes affected by RD (8%) showing a retinal sensitivity of 20 dB on MP1, the corresponding value on MAIA varied from 26.3 dB to 30.0 dB, with a mean value of 27.8 +/- 1.3 dB.Conclusion:The MAIA microperimeter provides a more accurate characterization of functional impairment in RD with respect to the MP1 system, especially in cases with low and high retinal sensitivity. MAIA microperimeter could reveal particularly useful in precisely identifying and monitoring subtle changes in retinal sensitivity, especially in view of the availability of therapies aiming at a functional rescue in patients with RD.
引用
收藏
页码:1662 / 1669
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Inter-device comparison of retinal sensitivity assessments in a healthy population: the CenterVue MAIA and the Nidek MP-3 microperimeters
    Karamat, Ayesha
    Balasubramanian, Siva
    Hariri, Amir H.
    Tepelus, Tudor
    Uji, Akihito
    Sadda, Srinivas R.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2017, 58 (08)
  • [22] Correlation of outer retinal thickness with scotopic and photopic fundus-controlled perimetry in patients with reticular drusen
    Schmitz-Valckenberg, Steffen
    Steinberg, Julia Stephanie
    Sassmannshausen, Marlene
    Fleckenstein, Monika
    Fimmers, Rolf
    Oishi, Akio
    Holz, Frank G.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2016, 57 (12)
  • [23] Retinal oxygen metabolism in healthy subjects and glaucoma patients
    Olafsdottir, Olof Birna
    Vandewalle, Evelien
    Pinto, Luis Abegao
    Geirsdottir, Asbjorg
    De Clerck, Eline
    Stalmans, Peter
    Gottfredsdottir, Maria Soffia
    Kristjansdottir, Jona Valgerdur
    Van Calster, Joachim
    Zeyen, Thierry
    Stefansson, Einar
    Stalmans, Ingeborg
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2014, 98 (03) : 329 - 333
  • [24] Monthly microperimetry (MP1) measurement of macular sensitivity after dexamethasone implantation (Ozurdex) in retinal vein occlusions
    Sibylle Winterhalter
    Gerrit Alexander vom Brocke
    Matthias K. Klamann
    Bert Müller
    Antonia M. Joussen
    Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2015, 253 : 1873 - 1882
  • [25] Monthly microperimetry (MP1) measurement of macular sensitivity after dexamethasone implantation (Ozurdex) in retinal vein occlusions
    Winterhalter, Sibylle
    vom Brocke, Gerrit Alexander
    Klamann, Matthias K.
    Mueller, Bert
    Joussen, Antonia M.
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2015, 253 (11) : 1873 - 1882
  • [26] Learning effect in frequency-doubling technology perimetry in healthy subjects and glaucoma patients
    Giampani, AB
    Giampani, J
    Daher, L
    Lopes, JF
    Malta, RFS
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2004, 45 : U105 - U105
  • [27] Correlation of Partial Outer Retinal Thickness With Scotopic and Mesopic Fundus-Controlled Perimetry in Patients With Reticular Drusen
    Steinberg, Julia S.
    Sassmannshausen, Marlene
    Fleckenstein, Monika
    Fimmers, Rolf
    Oishi, Akio
    Holz, Frank G.
    Schmitz-Valckenberg, Steffen
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 168 : 52 - 61
  • [28] Gene editing in human iPSC models derived from patients affected by inherited retinal dystrophies
    Siles, Laura
    Navines-Ferrer, Arnau
    Ruiz-Nogales, Sheila
    Pomares, Esther
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2023, 31 : 638 - 638
  • [29] Lipofuscin- and Melanin-related Fundus Autofluorescence in Patients with ABCA4-associated Retinal Dystrophies
    Kellner, Simone
    Kellner, Ulrich
    Weber, Bernhard H. F.
    Fiebig, Britta
    Weinitz, Silke
    Ruether, Klaus
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2009, 147 (05) : 895 - 902
  • [30] Test-Retest Variability of Microperimetry Using the Nidek MP1 in Patients with Macular Disease
    Chen, Fred K.
    Patel, Praveen J.
    Xing, Wen
    Bunce, Catey
    Egan, Catherine
    Tufail, Adnan T.
    Coffey, Peter J.
    Rubin, Gary S.
    Da Cruz, Lyndon
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2009, 50 (07) : 3464 - 3472