Percutaneous Coronary Intervention versus Coronary Artery Bypass Graft in Acute Coronary Syndrome patients with Renal Dysfunction

被引:9
|
作者
Zhang, Xiaojia [1 ]
Hu, Liangping [1 ,2 ]
Zheng, Wen [3 ]
机构
[1] Acad Mil Med Sci, Consulting Ctr Biomed Stat, Beijing 100850, Peoples R China
[2] Specialty Comm Clin Sci Res Stat World Federat Ch, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
[3] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Anzhen Hosp, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
来源
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 2018年 / 8卷
基金
国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划);
关键词
CHRONIC KIDNEY-DISEASE; IN-HOSPITAL OUTCOMES; FOLLOW-UP; REVASCULARIZATION; SURGERY; IMPACT; ANGIOPLASTY; POPULATION; MORTALITY; EVENTS;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-018-20651-3
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
ACS patients with renal dysfunction tend to have a poorer prognosis than those with normal renal function. This retrospective cohort study was performed using The Second Drug-Eluting Stent Impact on Revascularization Registry, a retrospective registry, to evaluate the time-dependent relative risk of revascularization strategies in ACS patients with renal dysfunction. The study demonstrated that the short-term MACCE rate was lower after PCI than CABG. However, there was no significant difference in long-term MACCE rate. Subgroup analyses based on the degree of renal dysfunction resulted in similar findings. The revascularization strategy was identified as a time-dependent covariate by the time-dependent Cox model, and the regression coefficient was '-1.124 + 0.344 x ln (time + 1)'. For the entire object group and the separate subgroups, PCI was initially associated with a lower hazard for MACCE than CABG after revascularization, then the hazard ratio increases with time. In conclusion, the hazard ratio for MACCE in PCI relative to CABG is time-dependent. PCI tends to have a lower risk for MACCE than CABG in the short-term, then the hazard ratio increases with time.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in diabetic patients
    Mukherjee, D
    CARDIOLOGY CLINICS, 2005, 23 (02) : 185 - +
  • [22] CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT SURGERY VERSUS PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION IN WOMEN WITH MULTI VESSEL CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE
    Alkhawam, Hassan
    Muskula, Preetham Reddy
    Abo-Salem, Elsayed
    Al-Sadawi, Mohammed
    Ampadu, James
    Salloum, Mohammad
    Lieber, Joseph J.
    Lim, Michael
    Helmy, Tarek
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 73 (09) : 42 - 42
  • [23] MORTALITY AFTER CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT IN PATIENTS WITH PRIOR PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION
    Mallia, G.
    Jiritano, F.
    Battaglia, D.
    Mastroroberto, P.
    Serraino, G.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL SUPPLEMENTS, 2022, 24 (SUPPL C)
  • [24] Comparison of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Diabetes
    Toklu B.
    Bangalore S.
    Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2015, 17 (5)
  • [25] Comparison of the Frequency of Acute Kidney Injury in Patients With Renal Transplant Who Underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
    Taduru, Siva Sagar
    Ramakrishnan, Madhuri
    Mustafa, Reem A.
    Baweja, Paramdeep S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 120 (07): : 1104 - 1109
  • [26] Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Severe Left Ventricle Dysfunction
    Hajj-Chahine, Jamil
    Clerin, Pierre
    Corbi, Pierre
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2014, 98 (05): : 1888 - 1889
  • [27] Clinical Outcome of Noncardiac Surgery in Patients With History of Coronary Artery Revascularization by Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
    Park, Jungchan
    Lee, Seung Hwa
    Kim, Jeayoun
    Park, Myungsoo
    Gwon, Hyeon-Cheol
    Lee, Young Tak
    Lee, Sangmin Maria
    JAPANESE CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2018, 9
  • [28] Drug eluting stent based percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass graft for treatment in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease
    Mun, H. S.
    Ahn, C. M.
    Min, P. K.
    Yoon, Y. W.
    Hong, B. K.
    Rim, S. J.
    Kwon, H. M.
    Kim, H. S.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2008, 29 : 682 - 682
  • [29] Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery for the treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis
    Hsu, Jen Te
    Chu, Chi Ming
    Chang, Shih Tai
    Kao, Chiung Lun
    Chung, Chang Min
    INTERNATIONAL HEART JOURNAL, 2008, 49 (03) : 355 - 370
  • [30] Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease
    Weirick T.
    Anderson H.V.
    Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports, 2009, 3 (5) : 309 - 310