Clinical Outcome of Noncardiac Surgery in Patients With History of Coronary Artery Revascularization by Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

被引:1
|
作者
Park, Jungchan [1 ]
Lee, Seung Hwa [2 ]
Kim, Jeayoun [1 ]
Park, Myungsoo [2 ]
Gwon, Hyeon-Cheol [2 ]
Lee, Young Tak [3 ]
Lee, Sangmin Maria [1 ]
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Samsung Med Ctr, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, 81 Irwon Ro, Seoul 06351, South Korea
[2] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Samsung Med Ctr, Div Cardiol, Heart Vasc Stroke Inst,Dept Med,Sch Med, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Thorac & Cardiovasc Surg, Seoul, South Korea
来源
关键词
Percutaneous coronary intervention; coronary artery bypass grafting; noncardiac surgery;
D O I
10.1177/1179670717748945
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: Although safety concerns still remain among patients undergoing unanticipated noncardiac surgery after prior percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), it has not been directly compared with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The objective of this study was to compare clinical outcomes after noncardiac surgery in patients with prior (>6 months) coronary revascularization by PCI or CABG. METHODS: From February 2010 to December 2015, 413 patients with a history of coronary revascularization, scheduled for noncardiac surgery were identified. Patients were divided into PCI group and CABG group and postoperative clinical outcome was compared between 2 groups. The primary outcome was composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in 1-year follow-up. RESULTS : The 413 patients were divided according to prior coronary revascularization types: 236 (57.1%) into PCI and 177 (42.9%) into CABG group. In multivariate analysis within 1-year follow-up, there was no significant difference in clinical outcome which was composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and stroke (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.50; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.76-2.93; P = .24). The same result was present in propensity-matched population analysis (HR: 1.43; 95% CI: 0.68-3.0; P = .34). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing noncardiac surgery with prior coronary revascularization by PCI or CABG performed on an average of 42 months after PCI and 50 months after CABG, postoperative clinical outcome at 1-year follow-up is comparable.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Complete revascularization - Coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention
    Ong, Andrew T. L.
    Serruys, Patrick W.
    CIRCULATION, 2006, 114 (03) : 249 - 255
  • [2] The Current State of Coronary Revascularization: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention versus Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
    Brown, Matthew A.
    Klusewitz, Seth
    Elefteriades, John
    Prescher, Lindsey
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANGIOLOGY, 2021, 30 (03) : 228 - 241
  • [3] Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Native Artery Versus Bypass Graft in Patients with Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
    Farag, Mohamed
    Brilakis, Emmanouil S.
    Gasparini, Gabriele L.
    Spratt, James C.
    Egred, Mohaned
    REVIEWS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2022, 23 (07)
  • [4] Repeat revascularization: Percutaneous coronary intervention after coronary artery bypass graft surgery
    Scarsini, Roberto
    Zivelonghi, Carlo
    Pesarini, Gabriele
    Vassanelli, Corrado
    Ribichini, Flavio L.
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2016, 17 (04) : 272 - 278
  • [5] Revascularization Options Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Kappetein, A. Pieter
    van Mieghem, Nicolas M.
    Head, Stuart J.
    HEART FAILURE CLINICS, 2016, 12 (01) : 135 - +
  • [6] Revascularization Options Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Kappetein, A. Pieter
    van Mieghem, Nicolas M.
    Head, Stuart J.
    CARDIOLOGY CLINICS, 2014, 32 (03) : 457 - +
  • [7] Percutaneous Coronary Intervention versus Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery in Left Main Coronary Artery Disease
    Sabatine, Marc S.
    Bergmark, Brian A.
    Murphy, Sabina A.
    O'Gara, Patrick T.
    Smith, Peter K.
    Serruys, Patrick W.
    Kappetein, A. Pieter P.
    Park, Seung-Jung
    Park, Duk-Woo
    Christiansen, Evald H.
    Holm, Niels R.
    Nielsen, Per H.
    Stone, Gregg W.
    Sabik, Joseph F.
    Braunwald, Eugene
    CIRCULATION, 2021, 144 (25) : E589 - E589
  • [8] The Current State of Coronary Revascularization: Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Versus Percutaneous Coronary Interventions
    Krittanawong, Chayakrit
    Rizwan, Affan
    Khawaja, Muzamil
    Newman, Noah
    Escobar, Johao
    Virk, Hafeez Ul Hassan
    Alam, Mahboob
    Al-Azzam, Fu'ad
    Yong, Celina M.
    Jneid, Hani
    CURRENT CARDIOLOGY REPORTS, 2024, 26 (09) : 919 - 933
  • [9] Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery: The battle rages on
    Tarantini, Giuseppe
    Zuccarelli, Vittorio
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2021, 98 (03) : 434 - 435
  • [10] Percutaneous Coronary Intervention or Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Coronary Revascularization: FAME and Fortune
    King, Spencer B., III
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2022, 35 : 194 - 195