Accumulative Sampling for Noisy Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization

被引:0
|
作者
Park, Taejin [1 ]
Ryu, Kwang Ryel [1 ]
机构
[1] Pusan Natl Univ, Dept Comp Engn, Pusan, South Korea
关键词
Multi-objective optimization; noisy optimization; evolutionary algorithm; dynamic resampling; probabilistic Pareto ranking; ALGORITHMS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Objective evaluation is subject to noise in many real-world problems. The noise can deteriorate the performance of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms, by misleading the population to a local optimum and reducing the convergence rate. This paper proposes three novel noise handling techniques: accumulative sampling, a new ranking method, and a different selection scheme for recombination. The accumulative sampling is basically a kind of dynamic resampling, but it does not explicitly decide the number of samples. Instead, it repeatedly takes additional samples of objectives for the solutions in the archive at every generation, and updates the estimated objectives using all the accumulated samples. The new ranking method combines probabilistic Pareto rank and crowding distance into a single aggregated value to promote the diversity in the archive. Finally, the fitness function and selection method used for recombination are made different from those for the archive to accelerate the convergence rate. Experiments on various benchmark problems have shown that the algorithm adopting all these features performs better than other MOEAs in various performance metrics.
引用
收藏
页码:793 / 800
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization for Biped Walking
    Yanase, Toshihiko
    Iba, Hitoshi
    [J]. SIMULATED EVOLUTION AND LEARNING, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 5361 : 635 - 644
  • [32] Weighted Preferences in Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization
    Friedrich, Tobias
    Kroeger, Trent
    Neumann, Frank
    [J]. AI 2011: ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2011, 7106 : 291 - +
  • [33] Interleaving Guidance in Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization
    Lam Thu Bui
    Kalyanmoy Deb
    Hussein A.Abbass
    Daryl Essam
    [J]. Journal of Computer Science & Technology, 2008, 23 (01) : 44 - 63
  • [34] Uniformity Assessment for Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization
    Li, Miqing
    Zheng, Jinhua
    Xiao, Guixia
    [J]. 2008 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, VOLS 1-8, 2008, : 625 - 632
  • [35] Multi-objective evolutionary computation and fuzzy optimization
    Jimenez, F.
    Cadenas, J. M.
    Sanchez, G.
    Gomez-Skarmeta, A. F.
    Verdegay, J. L.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING, 2006, 43 (01) : 59 - 75
  • [36] Multi-objective evolutionary algorithms for structural optimization
    Coello, CAC
    Pulido, GT
    Aguirre, AH
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL FLUID AND SOLID MECHANICS 2003, VOLS 1 AND 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 2244 - 2248
  • [37] Noise handling in evolutionary multi-objective optimization
    Goh, C. K.
    Tan, K. C.
    [J]. 2006 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, VOLS 1-6, 2006, : 1339 - +
  • [38] A Parallel Framework for Multi-objective Evolutionary Optimization
    Dasgupta, Dipankar
    Becerra, David
    Banceanu, Alex
    Nino, Fernando
    Simien, James
    [J]. 2010 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION (CEC), 2010,
  • [39] Weighted preferences in evolutionary multi-objective optimization
    Friedrich, Tobias
    Kroeger, Trent
    Neumann, Frank
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MACHINE LEARNING AND CYBERNETICS, 2013, 4 (02) : 139 - 148
  • [40] A study on multiform multi-objective evolutionary optimization
    Liangjie Zhang
    Yuling Xie
    Jianjun Chen
    Liang Feng
    Chao Chen
    Kai Liu
    [J]. Memetic Computing, 2021, 13 : 307 - 318