Autonomous Mission Operations

被引:0
|
作者
Frank, Jeremy [1 ]
Spirkovska, Lilijana [1 ]
McCann, Rob [1 ]
Wang, Lui [2 ]
Pohlkamp, Kara [2 ]
Morin, Lee [2 ]
机构
[1] NASA, Ames Res Ctr, Mail Stop N269-1, Moffett Field, CA 94035 USA
[2] NASA, Johnson Space Ctr, Houston, TX 77058 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
NASA's Advanced Exploration Systems Autonomous Mission Operations (AMO) project conducted an empirical investigation of the impact of time delay on today's mission operations, and of the effect of processes and mission support tools designed to mitigate time-delay related impacts. Mission operation scenarios were designed for NASA's Deep Space Habitat (DSH), an analog spacecraft habitat, covering a range of activities including nominal objectives, DSH system failures, and crew medical emergencies. The scenarios were simulated at time delay values representative of Lunar (1.2-5 sec), Near Earth Object (NEO) (50 sec) and Mars (300 sec) missions. Each combination of operational scenario and time delay was tested in a Baseline configuration, designed to reflect present-day operations of the International Space Station, and a Mitigation configuration in which a variety of software tools, information displays, and crew-ground communications protocols were employed to assist both crews and Flight Control Team (FCT) members with the long-delay conditions. Preliminary findings indicate: 1) Workload of both crewmembers and FCT members generally increased along with increasing time delay. 2) Advanced procedure execution viewers, caution and warning tools, and communications protocols such as text messaging decreased the workload of both flight controllers and crew, and decreased the difficulty of coordinating activities. 3) Whereas crew workload ratings increased between 50 sec and 300 sec of time delay in the Baseline configuration, workload ratings decreased (or remained flat) in the Mitigation configuration.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] THE GIOTTO MISSION OPERATIONS SYSTEM
    WILKINS, DEB
    ESA JOURNAL-EUROPEAN SPACE AGENCY, 1986, 10 (03): : 263 - 276
  • [42] Mission operations for the new Rosetta
    Ferri, P
    ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2006, 58 (02) : 105 - 111
  • [43] THE HYPERSPECTRAL PRISMA MISSION IN OPERATIONS
    Giacomo, Caporusso
    Ettore, Lopinto
    Rino, Lorusso
    Rosa, Loizzo
    Rocchina, Guarini
    Girolamo, Daraio Maria
    Patrizia, Sacco
    IGARSS 2020 - 2020 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, 2020, : 3282 - 3285
  • [44] InSight Mission: Early Operations
    Hoffman, Tom
    Grinblat, Jonathan
    Grover, Myron R.
    Imken, Travis
    2020 IEEE AEROSPACE CONFERENCE (AEROCONF 2020), 2020,
  • [45] AstroSat mission operations management
    Amit Kumar Singh
    M. Deepan
    Leo Jackson John
    B. N. Ramakrishna
    Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy, 2021, 42
  • [46] A MISSION PLANNER FOR AN AUTONOMOUS TRACTOR
    Bochtis, D. D.
    Vougioukas, S. G.
    Griepentrog, H. W.
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASABE, 2009, 52 (05): : 1429 - 1440
  • [47] Plug and Play Mission Operations
    Sorensen, Trevor
    Yost, Bruce
    Differding, Joan
    Pilger, Eric
    Nunes, Miguel
    2012 IEEE AEROSPACE CONFERENCE, 2012,
  • [48] AstroSat mission operations management
    Singh, Amit Kumar
    Deepan, M.
    John, Leo Jackson
    Ramakrishna, B. N.
    JOURNAL OF ASTROPHYSICS AND ASTRONOMY, 2021, 42 (02)
  • [49] Automation of ESOC mission operations
    Calzolari, G. P.
    Haag, S.
    Haddow, C. R.
    Pecchioli, M.
    SPACE OPERATIONS: MISSION MANAGEMENT, TECHNOLOGIES, AND CURRENT APPLICATIONS, 2007, 220 : 307 - +
  • [50] Concept of operations for increasingly autonomous space operations
    Beard, Bettina L.
    JOURNAL OF SPACE SAFETY ENGINEERING, 2024, 11 (04): : 636 - 651