Autonomous Mission Operations

被引:0
|
作者
Frank, Jeremy [1 ]
Spirkovska, Lilijana [1 ]
McCann, Rob [1 ]
Wang, Lui [2 ]
Pohlkamp, Kara [2 ]
Morin, Lee [2 ]
机构
[1] NASA, Ames Res Ctr, Mail Stop N269-1, Moffett Field, CA 94035 USA
[2] NASA, Johnson Space Ctr, Houston, TX 77058 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
NASA's Advanced Exploration Systems Autonomous Mission Operations (AMO) project conducted an empirical investigation of the impact of time delay on today's mission operations, and of the effect of processes and mission support tools designed to mitigate time-delay related impacts. Mission operation scenarios were designed for NASA's Deep Space Habitat (DSH), an analog spacecraft habitat, covering a range of activities including nominal objectives, DSH system failures, and crew medical emergencies. The scenarios were simulated at time delay values representative of Lunar (1.2-5 sec), Near Earth Object (NEO) (50 sec) and Mars (300 sec) missions. Each combination of operational scenario and time delay was tested in a Baseline configuration, designed to reflect present-day operations of the International Space Station, and a Mitigation configuration in which a variety of software tools, information displays, and crew-ground communications protocols were employed to assist both crews and Flight Control Team (FCT) members with the long-delay conditions. Preliminary findings indicate: 1) Workload of both crewmembers and FCT members generally increased along with increasing time delay. 2) Advanced procedure execution viewers, caution and warning tools, and communications protocols such as text messaging decreased the workload of both flight controllers and crew, and decreased the difficulty of coordinating activities. 3) Whereas crew workload ratings increased between 50 sec and 300 sec of time delay in the Baseline configuration, workload ratings decreased (or remained flat) in the Mitigation configuration.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] MISSION OPERATIONS STRATEGY FOR VIKING
    LEE, BG
    SCIENCE, 1976, 194 (4260) : 59 - 62
  • [32] Space mission planning and operations
    Adimurthy, V.
    Prasad, M. Y. S.
    Shivakumar, S. K.
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 2007, 93 (12): : 1791 - 1811
  • [33] GIOTTO - THE MISSION OPERATIONS SYSTEM
    WILKINS, DEB
    ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 1988, 17 (09) : 1033 - 1043
  • [34] MARS OBSERVER MISSION OPERATIONS
    ERICKSON, KD
    MCKINLEY, EL
    JOURNAL OF SPACECRAFT AND ROCKETS, 1991, 28 (05) : 542 - 551
  • [35] Space mission planning and operations
    Vikram Sarabhai Space Center, ISRO P.O, Thiruvananthapuram 695 022, India
    不详
    不详
    Curr. Sci., 2007, 12 (1791-1811):
  • [36] Rosetta mission operations for landing
    Accomazzo, Andrea
    Lodiot, Sylvain
    Companys, Vicente
    ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2016, 125 : 30 - 40
  • [37] WHAT IS THE MISSION OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH
    HITCHMAN, N
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONS RESEARCH SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1953, 1 (04): : 241 - 243
  • [38] ISPM MISSION OPERATIONS.
    Lemke, P.B.
    European Space Agency, (Special Publication) ESA SP, 1983, : 295 - 303
  • [39] InSight Mission: Early Operations
    Hoffman, Tom
    Grinblat, Jonathan
    Grover, Myron R.
    Halsell, Charles A.
    Imken, Travis
    2019 IEEE AEROSPACE CONFERENCE, 2019,
  • [40] NEAR mission and science operations
    Landshof, JA
    Cheng, AF
    JOURNAL OF THE ASTRONAUTICAL SCIENCES, 1995, 43 (04): : 477 - 489