Autonomous Mission Operations

被引:0
|
作者
Frank, Jeremy [1 ]
Spirkovska, Lilijana [1 ]
McCann, Rob [1 ]
Wang, Lui [2 ]
Pohlkamp, Kara [2 ]
Morin, Lee [2 ]
机构
[1] NASA, Ames Res Ctr, Mail Stop N269-1, Moffett Field, CA 94035 USA
[2] NASA, Johnson Space Ctr, Houston, TX 77058 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
NASA's Advanced Exploration Systems Autonomous Mission Operations (AMO) project conducted an empirical investigation of the impact of time delay on today's mission operations, and of the effect of processes and mission support tools designed to mitigate time-delay related impacts. Mission operation scenarios were designed for NASA's Deep Space Habitat (DSH), an analog spacecraft habitat, covering a range of activities including nominal objectives, DSH system failures, and crew medical emergencies. The scenarios were simulated at time delay values representative of Lunar (1.2-5 sec), Near Earth Object (NEO) (50 sec) and Mars (300 sec) missions. Each combination of operational scenario and time delay was tested in a Baseline configuration, designed to reflect present-day operations of the International Space Station, and a Mitigation configuration in which a variety of software tools, information displays, and crew-ground communications protocols were employed to assist both crews and Flight Control Team (FCT) members with the long-delay conditions. Preliminary findings indicate: 1) Workload of both crewmembers and FCT members generally increased along with increasing time delay. 2) Advanced procedure execution viewers, caution and warning tools, and communications protocols such as text messaging decreased the workload of both flight controllers and crew, and decreased the difficulty of coordinating activities. 3) Whereas crew workload ratings increased between 50 sec and 300 sec of time delay in the Baseline configuration, workload ratings decreased (or remained flat) in the Mitigation configuration.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mission operations with an autonomous agent
    Pell, B
    Sawyer, SR
    Muscettola, N
    Smith, B
    Bernard, DE
    1998 IEEE AEROSPACE CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, VOL 2, 1998, : 289 - 313
  • [2] AUTONOMOUS SATELLITE OPERATIONS VIA SECURE VIRTUAL MISSION OPERATIONS CENTER
    Miller, Eric
    Paulsen, Phillip
    Pasciuto, Michael
    2010 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, 2010, : 2607 - 2610
  • [3] Mission Planning for Collaborative Operations of Autonomous Marine Systems
    Kim, Donghyun
    Jang, Junwoo
    Kim, Jinwhan
    OCEANS 2023 - LIMERICK, 2023,
  • [4] AUTONOMOUS ON-COMET OPERATIONS ASPECTS OF THE ROSETTA MISSION
    SCHILLING, K
    ROTH, H
    THEOBOLD, B
    CONTROL ENGINEERING PRACTICE, 1994, 2 (03) : 499 - 507
  • [5] The Spacecraft Emergency Response System (SERS) for autonomous mission operations
    Breed, J
    Baker, P
    Chu, KD
    Starr, C
    Fox, J
    Baitinger, M
    REDUCING THE COST OF SPACECRAFT GROUND SYSTEMS AND OPERATIONS, 2000, 3 : 105 - 112
  • [6] Autonomous Aquaculture: Implementation of an autonomous mission control system for unmanned underwater vehicle operations
    Karlsen, Henning Odeby
    Amundsen, Herman Biorn
    Caharija, Walter
    Ludvigsen, Martin
    OCEANS 2021: SAN DIEGO - PORTO, 2021,
  • [7] Spacecraft autonomous operations experiment performed during the Clementine lunar mission
    Sorensen, Trevor C., 1600, AIAA, Washington, DC, United States (32):
  • [8] Spacecraft autonomous operations experiment performed during the Clementine lunar mission
    Sorensen, TC
    Oswald, DC
    Shook, RM
    VanGaasbeck, J
    JOURNAL OF SPACECRAFT AND ROCKETS, 1995, 32 (06) : 1049 - 1053
  • [9] Spacecraft/ground architectures using Internet protocols to facilitate autonomous mission operations
    Hayden, JL
    2000 IEEE AEROSPACE CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, VOL 2, 2000, : 163 - 177
  • [10] Mission operations
    Baer, GE
    Harvey, R
    Holdridge, ME
    Huebschman, RK
    Rodberg, EH
    JOHNS HOPKINS APL TECHNICAL DIGEST, 1999, 20 (04): : 511 - 521