Effect of surgeon specialty on processes of care and outcomes for ovarian cancer patients

被引:325
|
作者
Earle, CC
Schrag, D
Neville, BA
Yabroff, KR
Topor, M
Fahey, A
Trimble, EL
Bodurka, DC
Bristow, RE
Carney, M
Warren, JL
机构
[1] Dana Farber Canc Ctr, Dept Med Oncol, Ctr Outcomes & Policy Res, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, New York, NY 10021 USA
[3] Natl Canc Inst, Appl Res Program, Bethesda, MD USA
[4] Natl Canc Inst, Canc Therapy Evaluat Program, Bethesda, MD USA
[5] Informat Management Serv Inc, Rockville, MD USA
[6] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Gynecol Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[7] Univ Hawaii, Kapiolani Med Ctr, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Womens Hlth, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1093/jnci/djj019
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background. For many diseases, specialized care (i.e., care rendered by a specialist) has been associated with superior-quality care (i.e., better outcomes). We examined associations between physician specialty and outcomes in a population-based cohort of elderly ovarian cancer surgery patients. Methods: We analyzed the Medicare claims, by physician specialty, of all women aged 65 years or older who,underwent surgery for pathologically confirmed invasive epithelial ovarian cancer between January 1, 1992, and December 31, 1999, while living in an area monitored by the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program to assess important care processes (i.e., the appropriate extent of surgery and use of adjuvant chemotherapy) and outcomes (i.e., surgical complications, ostomy rates, and survival). All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: Among 3067 ovarian cancer patients who underwent surgery, 1017 patients (33%) were treated by a gynecologic oncologist, 1377 patients (45%) by a general gynecologist, and 673 patients (22%) by a general surgeon. Among patients with stage I or II disease, those treated by a gynecologic oncologist (60%) were more likely to undergo lymph node dissection than those treated by a general gynecologist (36%) or a general surgeon (16%). Patients with stage III or IV disease were more likely to undergo a debulking procedure if the initial surgery was performed by a gynecologic oncologist (58%) than by a general gynecologist (51 %) or a general surgeon (40%; P <.001) and were more likely to receive postoperative chemotherapy when operated on by a gynecologic oncologist (79%) or a general gynecologist (76%) than by a general surgeon (62%, P <.001). Survival among patients operated on by gynecologic oncologists (hazard ratio [HR] of death from any cause = 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.76 to 0.95) or general gynecologists (HR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.78 to 0.96) was better than that among patients operated on by general surgeons. Conclusions: Ovarian cancer patients treated by gynecologic oncologists had marginally better outcomes than those treated by general gynecologists and clearly superior outcomes compared with patients treated by general surgeons.
引用
收藏
页码:172 / 180
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The relationships of surgeon volume and specialty with outcomes following pediatric thyroidectomy
    Drews, Joseph D.
    Cooper, Jennifer N.
    Onwuka, Ekene A.
    Minneci, Peter C.
    Aldrink, Jennifer H.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2019, 54 (06) : 1226 - 1232
  • [32] OPTIMIZING COLORECTAL SURGERY OUTCOMES: WHAT IS THE CONTRIBUTION OF SURGEON SPECIALTY?
    Alimi, Y.
    Asemota, A.
    Safar, B.
    Fang, S.
    Gearhart, S.
    Efron, J.
    Wick, E.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2016, 59 (05) : E360 - E360
  • [33] Association Between Surgeon Specialty and Surgical Outcomes Following Esophagectomy
    Bui, A. H.
    Ninh, A.
    Leitman, M.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 25 : S203 - S203
  • [34] Surgeon specialty is associated with outcome in rectal cancer treatment
    Read, TE
    Myerson, RJ
    Fleshman, JW
    Fry, RD
    Birnbaum, EH
    Walz, BJ
    Kodner, IJ
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2002, 45 (07) : 904 - 914
  • [35] Outcomes in older patients with metastatic epithelial ovarian cancer: Are we providing equitable care?
    Burkett, Wesley
    Bui, Anthony
    Newton, Meredith
    Buckingham, Lindsey
    O'Donnell, Jillian
    Dockery, Lauren
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2022, 166 : S290 - S291
  • [36] Influence of surgeon specialty and volume on the utilization of minimally invasive surgery and outcomes for colorectal cancer: a retrospective review
    Osayande Osagiede
    Daniela A. Haehn
    Aaron C. Spaulding
    Nolan Otto
    Jordan J. Cochuyt
    Riccardo Lemini
    Amit Merchea
    Scott Kelley
    Dorin T. Colibaseanu
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2021, 35 : 5480 - 5488
  • [37] Influence of surgeon specialty and volume on the utilization of minimally invasive surgery and outcomes for colorectal cancer: a retrospective review
    Osagiede, Osayande
    Haehn, Daniela A.
    Spaulding, Aaron C.
    Otto, Nolan
    Cochuyt, Jordan J.
    Lemini, Riccardo
    Merchea, Amit
    Kelley, Scott
    Colibaseanu, Dorin T.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2021, 35 (10): : 5480 - 5488
  • [38] The effect of isolation precautions on care processes and medical outcomes in patients colonized with MRSA
    Labus, David
    Weinhold, Leonie
    Heller, Joerg
    GMS HYGIENE AND INFECTION CONTROL, 2019, 14
  • [39] In Pursuit of Optimal Cytoreduction in Ovarian Cancer Patients: The Role of Surgery and Surgeon
    Shashikant, Lele
    Joshua, Kesterson P.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY OF INDIA, 2009, 59 (03): : 209 - 216
  • [40] Impact of surgeon type and rurality on treatment and survival of ovarian cancer patients
    Weeks, Kristin
    West, Michele
    Carnahan, Ryan
    O'Rorke, Michael
    McDonald, Megan
    Lynch, Chuck
    Charlton, Mary
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2021, 162 : S183 - S184