Effect of surgeon specialty on processes of care and outcomes for ovarian cancer patients

被引:325
|
作者
Earle, CC
Schrag, D
Neville, BA
Yabroff, KR
Topor, M
Fahey, A
Trimble, EL
Bodurka, DC
Bristow, RE
Carney, M
Warren, JL
机构
[1] Dana Farber Canc Ctr, Dept Med Oncol, Ctr Outcomes & Policy Res, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, New York, NY 10021 USA
[3] Natl Canc Inst, Appl Res Program, Bethesda, MD USA
[4] Natl Canc Inst, Canc Therapy Evaluat Program, Bethesda, MD USA
[5] Informat Management Serv Inc, Rockville, MD USA
[6] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Gynecol Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[7] Univ Hawaii, Kapiolani Med Ctr, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Womens Hlth, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1093/jnci/djj019
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background. For many diseases, specialized care (i.e., care rendered by a specialist) has been associated with superior-quality care (i.e., better outcomes). We examined associations between physician specialty and outcomes in a population-based cohort of elderly ovarian cancer surgery patients. Methods: We analyzed the Medicare claims, by physician specialty, of all women aged 65 years or older who,underwent surgery for pathologically confirmed invasive epithelial ovarian cancer between January 1, 1992, and December 31, 1999, while living in an area monitored by the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program to assess important care processes (i.e., the appropriate extent of surgery and use of adjuvant chemotherapy) and outcomes (i.e., surgical complications, ostomy rates, and survival). All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: Among 3067 ovarian cancer patients who underwent surgery, 1017 patients (33%) were treated by a gynecologic oncologist, 1377 patients (45%) by a general gynecologist, and 673 patients (22%) by a general surgeon. Among patients with stage I or II disease, those treated by a gynecologic oncologist (60%) were more likely to undergo lymph node dissection than those treated by a general gynecologist (36%) or a general surgeon (16%). Patients with stage III or IV disease were more likely to undergo a debulking procedure if the initial surgery was performed by a gynecologic oncologist (58%) than by a general gynecologist (51 %) or a general surgeon (40%; P <.001) and were more likely to receive postoperative chemotherapy when operated on by a gynecologic oncologist (79%) or a general gynecologist (76%) than by a general surgeon (62%, P <.001). Survival among patients operated on by gynecologic oncologists (hazard ratio [HR] of death from any cause = 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.76 to 0.95) or general gynecologists (HR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.78 to 0.96) was better than that among patients operated on by general surgeons. Conclusions: Ovarian cancer patients treated by gynecologic oncologists had marginally better outcomes than those treated by general gynecologists and clearly superior outcomes compared with patients treated by general surgeons.
引用
收藏
页码:172 / 180
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Clinical and financial outcomes in cancer patients with integration of specialty palliative care versus standard oncology care.
    Gaster, Sam
    Arneson, Francine
    Rojas-Espaillat, Luis Alexander
    Hruby, Nathan
    Perrenoud, Mari
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 37 (27)
  • [22] Variation in acute cholecystitis outcomes and processes of care in patients with cancer Discussion
    Stallion, Anthony
    Joyce, Daniel
    Johnson, Patrick L.
    McHenry, Christopher
    Gross, Abby
    Walsh, R. Matthew
    SURGERY, 2025, 179
  • [23] Breast Cancer Quality of Care and Outcomes According to Surgeon Caseload
    Taban, F.
    Rapiti, E.
    Fioretta, G.
    Wespi, Y.
    Weintraub, D.
    Hugli, A.
    Neyroud-Caspar, I.
    Vlastos, G.
    Castiglione, M.
    Bouchardy, C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 48 : S108 - S108
  • [24] Improved outcomes due to changes in organization of care for patients with ovarian cancer in the Netherlands
    Eggink, F. A.
    Mom, C. H.
    Kruitwagen, R. F.
    Reyners, A. K.
    Van Driel, W. J.
    Massuger, L. F.
    Niemeijer, G. C.
    Van der Zee, A. G.
    Van der Aa, M. A.
    Nijman, H. W.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2016, 141 (03) : 524 - 530
  • [25] Outcomes of specialty care of diabetic patients with poor glycemic control
    Leichter, SB
    Rifkin, S
    August, GL
    DIABETES, 1998, 47 : A87 - A87
  • [26] Physician Volume, Specialty, and Outcomes of Care for Patients With Heart Failure
    Joynt, Karen E.
    Orav, E. John
    Jha, Ashish K.
    CIRCULATION-HEART FAILURE, 2013, 6 (05) : 890 - 897
  • [27] Relation of surgeon and hospital volume to processes and outcomes of colorectal cancer surgery
    Rogers, Selwyn O., Jr.
    Wolf, Robert E.
    Zaslavsky, Alan M.
    Wright, William E.
    Ayanian, John Z.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2006, 244 (06) : 1003 - 1011
  • [28] Surgeon specialty does not influence outcomes of hiatal hernia repair
    Hadaya, Joseph
    Handa, Rahul
    Mabeza, Russyan Mark
    Dobaria, Vishal
    Sanaiha, Yas
    Benharash, Peyman
    SURGERY, 2022, 172 (02) : 734 - 740
  • [29] Integration of specialty palliative care in a phase I ovarian cancer population.
    Moroney, Marisa R.
    Hill, Breana
    Sheeder, Jeanelle
    Diamond, Jennifer Robinson
    Avella-Howell, Melony
    Corr, Bradley
    Lefkowits, Carolyn
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 37 (31)
  • [30] Surgeon Specialty Is Associated With Better Outcomes: The Facts Speak for Themselves
    Wood, Douglas E.
    Farjah, Farhood
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2009, 88 (05): : 1393 - 1395