Use of the 'real-ear to dial difference' to derive real-ear SPL from hearing level obtained with insert earphones

被引:15
|
作者
Munro, KJ [1 ]
Lazenby, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southampton, Inst Sound & Vibrat Res, Hearing & Balance Ctr, Southampton SO17 1BJ, Hants, England
来源
BRITISH JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY | 2001年 / 35卷 / 05期
关键词
real-ear sound pressure level; real-ear to dial difference (REDD);
D O I
10.1080/00305364.2001.11745248
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
The electroacoustic characteristics of a hearing instrument are normally selected for individuals using data obtained during audiological assessment. The precise inter-relationship between the electroacoustic and audiometric variables is most readily appreciated when they have been measured at the same reference point, such as the tympanic membrane. However, it is not always possible to obtain the real-ear sound pressure level (SPL) directly if this is below the noise floor of the probe-tube microphone system or if the subject is unco-operative. The real-ear SPL may be derived by adding the subject's real-ear to dial difference (REDD) acoustic transform to the audiometer dial setting. The aim of the present study was to confirm the validity of the Audioscan RM500 to measure the REDD with the ER-3A insert earphone. A probe-tube microphone was used to measure the real-ear SPL and REDD from the right ears of 16 adult subjects ranging in age from 22 to 41 years (mean age 27 years). Measurements were made from 0.25 kHz to 6 kHz at a dial setting of 70 dB with an ER-3A insert earphone and two earmould configurations: the EAR-LINK foam car-tip and the subjects' customized skeleton earmoulds. Mean REDD varied as a function of frequency but was typically approximately 12 dB with a standard deviation (SD) of +/-1.7 dB and +/-2.7 dB for the foam ear-tip and customized earmould, respectively. The mean test-retest difference of the REDD varied with frequency but was typically 0.5 dB (SD I dB). Over the frequency range 0.5-4 kHz, the derived values were found to be within 5 dB of the measured values in 95% of subjects when using the EAR-LINK foam ear-tip and within 4 dB when using the skeleton earmould. The individually measured REDD transform can be used in clinical practice to derive a valid estimate of real-ear SPL when it has not been possible to measure this directly.
引用
收藏
页码:297 / 306
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Deriving the real-ear SPL of audiometric data using the "coupler to dial difference" and the "real ear to coupler difference"
    Munro, KJ
    Davis, J
    EAR AND HEARING, 2003, 24 (02): : 100 - 110
  • [2] IS REAL-EAR ATTENUATION AT THRESHOLD A FUNCTION OF HEARING LEVEL
    BERGER, EH
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1985, 78 (05): : 1588 - 1595
  • [3] COMPARABLE COUPLER AND REAL-EAR MEASUREMENTS ON SUPRAAURAL-AND INSERT-TYPE EARPHONES
    BRYANT, HW
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1972, 52 (06): : 1599 - 1606
  • [4] Measuring the real-ear to coupler difference transfer function with an insert earphone and a hearing instrument: Are they the same?
    Munro, KJ
    Toal, S
    EAR AND HEARING, 2005, 26 (01): : 27 - 34
  • [5] Real-ear to coupler difference in patients with ear drum perforation
    Liu, TC
    Lin, KN
    ORL-JOURNAL FOR OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY AND ITS RELATED SPECIALTIES, 1999, 61 (06): : 345 - 349
  • [6] COMPARABLE COUPLER AND REAL-EAR MEASUREMENTS ON SUPRAAURAL- AND INSERT-TYPE EARPHONES.
    Bryant, H.W.
    1600, (52):
  • [7] Comparison of Real-Ear to Coupler Difference Values in the Right and Left Ear of Hearing Aid Users
    Munro, Kevin J.
    Howlin, Elaine M.
    EAR AND HEARING, 2010, 31 (01): : 146 - 150
  • [8] Real-ear output measures of ear level fluency devices
    Stuart, Andrew
    Butler, Alyson K.
    Jones, Sherri M.
    Jones, Timothy A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2013, 52 (06) : 413 - 418
  • [9] MAXIMUM REAL-EAR GAIN OF IN-THE-EAR HEARING-AIDS
    ERICKSON, FN
    VANTASELL, DJ
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1991, 34 (02): : 351 - 359
  • [10] Is the real-ear to coupler difference independent of the measurement earphone?
    Munro, KJ
    Salisbury, VA
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2002, 41 (07) : 408 - 413