Environmental controls on the light use efficiency of terrestrial gross primary production

被引:13
|
作者
Bloomfield, Keith J. [1 ,10 ]
Stocker, Benjamin D. [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Keenan, Trevor F. [6 ,7 ]
Prentice, I. Colin [1 ,8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Georgina Mace Ctr Living Planet, Dept Life Sci, Ascot, England
[2] ETH, Dept Environm Syst Sci, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Swiss Fed Inst Forest Snow & Landscape Res WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland
[4] Univ Bern, Inst Geog, Bern, Switzerland
[5] Univ Bern, Oeschger Ctr Climate Change Res, Bern, Switzerland
[6] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Environm Sci Policy & Management, Berkeley, CA USA
[7] Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab, Climate & Ecosyst Sci Div, Berkeley, CA USA
[8] Macquarie Univ, Dept Biol Sci, N Ryde, NSW, Australia
[9] Tsinghua Univ, Dept Earth Syst Sci, Key Lab Earth Syst Modelling, Minist Educ, Beijing, Peoples R China
[10] Imperial Coll London, Georgina Mace Ctr Living Planet, Dept Life Sci, Silwood Pk Campus,Buckhurst Rd, Ascot SL5 7PY, England
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会; 欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
diffuse radiation; eddy covariance; FLUXNET; light use efficiency; soil moisture; temperature; terrestrial biosphere model; vapor pressure deficit; TEMPERATURE RESPONSE FUNCTIONS; CARBON-DIOXIDE EXCHANGE; NET ECOSYSTEM EXCHANGE; THERMAL-ACCLIMATION; NITROGEN RELATIONSHIPS; CO2; ASSIMILATION; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; MODEL; CLIMATE; FOREST;
D O I
10.1111/gcb.16511
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Gross primary production (GPP) by terrestrial ecosystems is a key quantity in the global carbon cycle. The instantaneous controls of leaf-level photosynthesis are well established, but there is still no consensus on the mechanisms by which canopy-level GPP depends on spatial and temporal variation in the environment. The standard model of photosynthesis provides a robust mechanistic representation for C-3 species; however, additional assumptions are required to "scale up " from leaf to canopy. As a consequence, competing models make inconsistent predictions about how GPP will respond to continuing environmental change. This problem is addressed here by means of an empirical analysis of the light use efficiency (LUE) of GPP inferred from eddy covariance carbon dioxide flux measurements, in situ measurements of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), and remotely sensed estimates of the fraction of PAR (fAPAR) absorbed by the vegetation canopy. Focusing on LUE allows potential drivers of GPP to be separated from its overriding dependence on light. GPP data from over 100 sites, collated over 20 years and located in a range of biomes and climate zones, were extracted from the FLUXNET2015 database and combined with remotely sensed fAPAR data to estimate daily LUE. Daytime air temperature, vapor pressure deficit, diffuse fraction of solar radiation, and soil moisture were shown to be salient predictors of LUE in a generalized linear mixed-effects model. The same model design was fitted to site-based LUE estimates generated by 16 terrestrial ecosystem models. The published models showed wide variation in the shape, the strength, and even the sign of the environmental effects on modeled LUE. These findings highlight important model deficiencies and suggest a need to progress beyond simple "goodness of fit " comparisons of inferred and predicted carbon fluxes toward an approach focused on the functional responses of the underlying dependencies.
引用
收藏
页码:1037 / 1053
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Variability in Light-Use Efficiency for Gross Primary Productivity on Great Plains Grasslands
    H. Wayne Polley
    Rebecca L. Phillips
    Albert B. Frank
    James A. Bradford
    Phillip L. Sims
    Jack A. Morgan
    James R. Kiniry
    Ecosystems, 2011, 14 : 15 - 27
  • [42] A general model for the light-use efficiency of primary production
    Haxeltine, A
    Prentice, IC
    FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY, 1996, 10 (05) : 551 - 561
  • [43] Estimating Forest Gross Primary Production Using Machine Learning, Light Use Efficiency Model, and Global Eddy Covariance Data
    Tian, Zhenkun
    Fu, Yingying
    Zhou, Tao
    Yi, Chuixiang
    Kutter, Eric
    Zhang, Qin
    Krakauer, Nir Y.
    FORESTS, 2024, 15 (09):
  • [44] Coupling a light use efficiency model with a machine learning-based water constraint for predicting grassland gross primary production
    Yu, Ruiyang
    Yao, Yunjun
    Tang, Qingxin
    Shao, Changliang
    Fisher, Joshua B.
    Chen, Jiquan
    Jia, Kun
    Zhang, Xiaotong
    Li, Yufu
    Shang, Ke
    Yang, Junming
    Liu, Lu
    Zhang, Xueyi
    Guo, Xiaozheng
    Xie, Zijing
    Ning, Jing
    Fan, Jiahui
    Zhang, Lilin
    AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2023, 341
  • [45] The Divergent Estimates of Diffuse Radiation Effects on Gross Primary Production of Forest Ecosystems Using Light-Use Efficiency Models
    Liu, Qiaozhen
    Zhang, Zhaoyang
    Fan, Meng
    Wang, Quan
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 48 (19)
  • [46] Global vegetation gross primary production estimation using satellite-derived light-use efficiency and canopy conductance
    Yebra, Marta
    Van Dijk, Albert I. J. M.
    Leuning, Ray
    Guerschman, Juan Pablo
    REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 163 : 206 - 216
  • [47] Deriving maximal light use efficiency from coordinated flux measurements and satellite data for regional gross primary production modeling
    Wang, Hesong
    Jia, Gensuo
    Fu, Congbin
    Feng, Jinming
    Zhao, Tianbao
    Ma, Zhuguo
    REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2010, 114 (10) : 2248 - 2258
  • [48] Improving satellite-based modelling of gross primary production in deciduous broadleaf forests by accounting for seasonality in light use efficiency
    Zhou, Xuewen
    Xin, Qinchuan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2019, 40 (03) : 931 - 955
  • [49] Trends and controls of terrestrial gross primary productivity of China during 2000-2016
    Ma, Jun
    Xiao, Xiangming
    Miao, Renhui
    Li, Yao
    Chen, Bangqian
    Zhang, Yao
    Zhao, Bin
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2019, 14 (08):
  • [50] Evaluation and Comparison of Light Use Efficiency and Gross Primary Productivity Using Three Different Approaches
    Wang, Mengjia
    Sun, Rui
    Zhu, Anran
    Xiao, Zhiqiang
    REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 12 (06)