Environmental controls on the light use efficiency of terrestrial gross primary production

被引:6
|
作者
Bloomfield, Keith J. [1 ,10 ]
Stocker, Benjamin D. [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Keenan, Trevor F. [6 ,7 ]
Prentice, I. Colin [1 ,8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Georgina Mace Ctr Living Planet, Dept Life Sci, Ascot, England
[2] ETH, Dept Environm Syst Sci, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Swiss Fed Inst Forest Snow & Landscape Res WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland
[4] Univ Bern, Inst Geog, Bern, Switzerland
[5] Univ Bern, Oeschger Ctr Climate Change Res, Bern, Switzerland
[6] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Environm Sci Policy & Management, Berkeley, CA USA
[7] Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab, Climate & Ecosyst Sci Div, Berkeley, CA USA
[8] Macquarie Univ, Dept Biol Sci, N Ryde, NSW, Australia
[9] Tsinghua Univ, Dept Earth Syst Sci, Key Lab Earth Syst Modelling, Minist Educ, Beijing, Peoples R China
[10] Imperial Coll London, Georgina Mace Ctr Living Planet, Dept Life Sci, Silwood Pk Campus,Buckhurst Rd, Ascot SL5 7PY, England
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会; 欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
diffuse radiation; eddy covariance; FLUXNET; light use efficiency; soil moisture; temperature; terrestrial biosphere model; vapor pressure deficit; TEMPERATURE RESPONSE FUNCTIONS; CARBON-DIOXIDE EXCHANGE; NET ECOSYSTEM EXCHANGE; THERMAL-ACCLIMATION; NITROGEN RELATIONSHIPS; CO2; ASSIMILATION; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; MODEL; CLIMATE; FOREST;
D O I
10.1111/gcb.16511
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Gross primary production (GPP) by terrestrial ecosystems is a key quantity in the global carbon cycle. The instantaneous controls of leaf-level photosynthesis are well established, but there is still no consensus on the mechanisms by which canopy-level GPP depends on spatial and temporal variation in the environment. The standard model of photosynthesis provides a robust mechanistic representation for C-3 species; however, additional assumptions are required to "scale up " from leaf to canopy. As a consequence, competing models make inconsistent predictions about how GPP will respond to continuing environmental change. This problem is addressed here by means of an empirical analysis of the light use efficiency (LUE) of GPP inferred from eddy covariance carbon dioxide flux measurements, in situ measurements of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), and remotely sensed estimates of the fraction of PAR (fAPAR) absorbed by the vegetation canopy. Focusing on LUE allows potential drivers of GPP to be separated from its overriding dependence on light. GPP data from over 100 sites, collated over 20 years and located in a range of biomes and climate zones, were extracted from the FLUXNET2015 database and combined with remotely sensed fAPAR data to estimate daily LUE. Daytime air temperature, vapor pressure deficit, diffuse fraction of solar radiation, and soil moisture were shown to be salient predictors of LUE in a generalized linear mixed-effects model. The same model design was fitted to site-based LUE estimates generated by 16 terrestrial ecosystem models. The published models showed wide variation in the shape, the strength, and even the sign of the environmental effects on modeled LUE. These findings highlight important model deficiencies and suggest a need to progress beyond simple "goodness of fit " comparisons of inferred and predicted carbon fluxes toward an approach focused on the functional responses of the underlying dependencies.
引用
收藏
页码:1037 / 1053
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Water use efficiency of net primary production in global terrestrial ecosystems
    Xia, Lei
    Wang, Fei
    Mu, Xingmin
    Jin, Kai
    Sun, Wenyi
    Gao, Peng
    Zhao, Guangju
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCE, 2015, 124 (05) : 921 - 931
  • [22] The use of remote sensing in light use efficiency based models of gross primary production: A review of current status and future requirements
    Hilker, Thomas
    Coops, Nicholas C.
    Wulder, Michael A.
    Black, T. Andrew
    Guy, Robert D.
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2008, 404 (2-3) : 411 - 423
  • [23] Simulation of Gross Primary Productivity Using Multiple Light Use Efficiency Models
    Zhang, Jun
    Wang, Xufeng
    Ren, Jun
    [J]. LAND, 2021, 10 (03)
  • [24] Patterns and controls of the variability of radiation use efficiency and primary productivity across terrestrial ecosystems
    Garbulsky, Martin F.
    Penuelas, Josep
    Papale, Dario
    Ardo, Jonas
    Goulden, Michael L.
    Kiely, Gerard
    Richardson, Andrew D.
    Rotenberg, Eyal
    Veenendaal, Elmar M.
    Filella, Iolanda
    [J]. GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2010, 19 (02): : 253 - 267
  • [25] ENVIRONMENTAL LIMITS ON NET PRIMARY PRODUCTION AND LIGHT-USE EFFICIENCY ACROSS THE OREGON TRANSECT
    RUNYON, J
    WARING, RH
    GOWARD, SN
    WELLES, JM
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 1994, 4 (02) : 226 - 237
  • [26] Forest carbon use efficiency: is respiration a constant fraction of gross primary production?
    DeLucia, Evan H.
    Drake, John E.
    Thomas, Richard B.
    Gonzalez-Meler, Miquel
    [J]. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2007, 13 (06) : 1157 - 1167
  • [27] Variation of gross primary production, evapotranspiration and water use efficiency for global croplands
    Ai, Zhipin
    Wang, Qinxue
    Yang, Yonghui
    Manevski, Kiril
    Yi, Shuang
    Zhao, Xin
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2020, 287
  • [28] Impacts of diffuse radiation fraction on light use efficiency and gross primary production of winter wheat in the North China Plain
    Yang, Xiaoya
    Li, Jun
    Yu, Qiang
    Ma, Yuchun
    Tong, Xiaojuan
    Feng, Yan
    Tong, Yingxiang
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2019, 275 : 233 - 242
  • [29] Large historical growth in global terrestrial gross primary production
    Campbell, J. E.
    Berry, J. A.
    Seibt, U.
    Smith, S. J.
    Montzka, S. A.
    Launois, T.
    Belviso, S.
    Bopp, L.
    Laine, M.
    [J]. NATURE, 2017, 544 (7648) : 84 - 87
  • [30] Drought threat to terrestrial gross primary production exacerbated by wildfires
    Zong, Xuezheng
    Tian, Xiaorui
    Liu, Xiaodong
    Shu, Lifu
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS EARTH & ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 5 (01):