Adverse events of procedural sedation and analgesia in a pediatric emergency department

被引:202
|
作者
Peña, BMG [1 ]
Krauss, B [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Childrens Hosp, Dept Pediat,Div Emergency Med, Boston, MA 02215 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0196-0644(99)80050-X
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Study objective: To determine the adverse event and complication rate for the use of procedural sedation and analgesia for painful procedures and diagnostic imaging studies performed in a pediatric emergency department. Methods: This prospective case series was conducted in the ED of a large, urban pediatric teaching hospital. Subjects were patients younger than 21 years seen between August 1997 and July 1998, who required intravenous, intramuscular, oral, rectal, intranasal, or inhalational agents for painful procedures or diagnostic imaging. All patients who underwent procedural sedation and analgesia were continually monitored. Adverse events and complications were recorded. The ED controlled substance log was checked weekly and all sedations were reviewed. Adverse events were defined as follows: oxygen desaturation less than 90%, apnea, strider, laryngospasm, bronchospasm, cardiovascular instability, paradoxical reactions, emergence reactions, emesis, and aspiration. Complications were defined as adverse events that negatively affected outcome or delayed recovery Results: Of 1,180 patients who underwent procedural sedation and analgesia in the ED, 27 (2.3%) experienced adverse events, which included oxygen desaturation less than 90% requiring intervention (10 patients) [supplemental oxygen (9), bag-mask ventilation (1)], paradoxical reactions (7), emesis (3), paradoxical reaction and oxygen desaturation requiring supplemental oxygen (2), apnea requiring bag-mask ventilation (1), laryngospasm requiring bag-mask ventilation (1), bradycardia (1), strider and emesis(1) and oxygen desaturation requiring bag-mask ventilation with subsequent emesis(1). There was no statistically significant difference in mean doses for all procedural sedation and analgesia medication regimens between those children who experienced adverse events and those who did not. No single drug or drug regimen was associated with a higher adverse event rate. In addition, there was no significant difference in the adverse event rate between males and females, among the different ages, or among the different indications for procedural sedation and analgesia. No patient required reversal of sedation with naloxone or flumazenil, endotracheal intubation, or hospital admission because of complications from procedural sedation and analgesia. Conclusion: The adverse event rate for procedural sedation and analgesia performed by pediatric emergency physicians was 2.3% with no serious complications noted.
引用
收藏
页码:483 / 491
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Pediatric procedural sedation and analgesia
    Doyle, L
    Colletti, JE
    PEDIATRIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2006, 53 (02) : 279 - +
  • [42] Profiling adverse respiratory events and vomiting when using propofol for emergency department procedural sedation
    Bell, Anthony
    Treston, Greg
    McNabb, Charley
    Monypenny, Kathy
    Cardwell, Robert
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE AUSTRALASIA, 2007, 19 (05) : 405 - 410
  • [43] Pediatric Procedural Sedation and Analgesia
    Pacheco, Garrett S.
    Ferayorni, Angelique
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2013, 31 (03) : 831 - +
  • [44] Procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department. Canadian consensus guidelines
    Innes, G
    Murphy, M
    Nijssen-Jordan, C
    Ducharme, J
    Drummond, A
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1999, 17 (01): : 145 - 156
  • [45] Propofol for emergency department procedural sedation and analgesia: A tale of three centers
    Burton, JH
    Miner, JR
    Shipley, ER
    Strout, TD
    Becker, C
    Thode, HC
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2006, 13 (01) : 24 - 30
  • [46] The Surgical Stress Response, Preemptive Analgesia, and Procedural Sedation in the Emergency Department
    Miner, James R.
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2008, 15 (10) : 955 - 958
  • [47] The use of propofol for procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department: a comparison with midazolam
    Rahman, Nik H. N. A.
    Hashim, Ahmad
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2011, 28 (10) : 861 - 865
  • [48] Safety of procedural sedation and analgesia in children less than 2 years of age in a pediatric emergency department
    Shailendra Misra
    Prashant V. Mahajan
    Xinguang Chen
    Nirupama Kannikeswaran
    International Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2008, 1 (3) : 173 - 177
  • [49] Safety of procedural sedation and analgesia in children less than 2 years of age in a pediatric emergency department
    Misra, Shailendra
    Mahajan, Prashant V.
    Chen, Xinguang
    Kannikeswaran, Nirupama
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2008, 1 : 173 - 177
  • [50] Procedural Sedation in the Emergency Department
    Eberson, Craig P.
    Hsu, Raymond Y.
    Borenstein, Todd R.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2015, 23 (04) : 233 - 242