Adverse events of procedural sedation and analgesia in a pediatric emergency department

被引:202
|
作者
Peña, BMG [1 ]
Krauss, B [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Childrens Hosp, Dept Pediat,Div Emergency Med, Boston, MA 02215 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0196-0644(99)80050-X
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Study objective: To determine the adverse event and complication rate for the use of procedural sedation and analgesia for painful procedures and diagnostic imaging studies performed in a pediatric emergency department. Methods: This prospective case series was conducted in the ED of a large, urban pediatric teaching hospital. Subjects were patients younger than 21 years seen between August 1997 and July 1998, who required intravenous, intramuscular, oral, rectal, intranasal, or inhalational agents for painful procedures or diagnostic imaging. All patients who underwent procedural sedation and analgesia were continually monitored. Adverse events and complications were recorded. The ED controlled substance log was checked weekly and all sedations were reviewed. Adverse events were defined as follows: oxygen desaturation less than 90%, apnea, strider, laryngospasm, bronchospasm, cardiovascular instability, paradoxical reactions, emergence reactions, emesis, and aspiration. Complications were defined as adverse events that negatively affected outcome or delayed recovery Results: Of 1,180 patients who underwent procedural sedation and analgesia in the ED, 27 (2.3%) experienced adverse events, which included oxygen desaturation less than 90% requiring intervention (10 patients) [supplemental oxygen (9), bag-mask ventilation (1)], paradoxical reactions (7), emesis (3), paradoxical reaction and oxygen desaturation requiring supplemental oxygen (2), apnea requiring bag-mask ventilation (1), laryngospasm requiring bag-mask ventilation (1), bradycardia (1), strider and emesis(1) and oxygen desaturation requiring bag-mask ventilation with subsequent emesis(1). There was no statistically significant difference in mean doses for all procedural sedation and analgesia medication regimens between those children who experienced adverse events and those who did not. No single drug or drug regimen was associated with a higher adverse event rate. In addition, there was no significant difference in the adverse event rate between males and females, among the different ages, or among the different indications for procedural sedation and analgesia. No patient required reversal of sedation with naloxone or flumazenil, endotracheal intubation, or hospital admission because of complications from procedural sedation and analgesia. Conclusion: The adverse event rate for procedural sedation and analgesia performed by pediatric emergency physicians was 2.3% with no serious complications noted.
引用
收藏
页码:483 / 491
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department: What are the risks?
    Miller, MA
    Levy, P
    Patel, MM
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2005, 23 (02) : 551 - +
  • [32] Consensus-Based Recommendations for Standardizing Terminology and Reporting Adverse Events for Emergency Department Procedural Sedation and Analgesia in Children
    Bhatt, Maala
    Kennedy, Robert M.
    Osmond, Martin H.
    Krauss, Baruch
    McAllister, John D.
    Ansermino, J. Mark
    Evered, Lisa M.
    Roback, Mark G.
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2009, 53 (04) : 426 - 435
  • [33] Propofol for procedural sedation in the pediatric emergency department
    Pershad, J
    Godambe, SA
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2004, 27 (01): : 11 - 14
  • [34] Is Higher ASA Class Associated With an Increased Incidence of Adverse Events During Procedural Sedation in a Pediatric Emergency Department?
    Caperell, Kerry
    Pitetti, Raymond
    PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 2009, 25 (10) : 661 - 664
  • [35] Correction to: Pediatric procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department: surveying the current European practice
    Cyril Sahyoun
    Aymeric Cantais
    Alain Gervaix
    Silvia Bressan
    Ruth Löllgen
    Baruch Krauss
    European Journal of Pediatrics, 2021, 180 : 1815 - 1816
  • [36] Fasting is a consideration - Not a necessity - for emergency department procedural sedation and analgesia
    Green, SM
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2003, 42 (05) : 647 - 650
  • [37] A mini-review of procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department
    Homma, Yosuke
    Norii, Tatsuya
    Kanazawa, Takeshi
    Hoshino, Atsumi
    Arino, Satoshi
    Takase, Hiroshi
    Albright, Danielle
    Funakoshi, Hiraku
    ACUTE MEDICINE & SURGERY, 2020, 7 (01):
  • [38] Dosing ketamine for pediatric procedural sedation in the emergency department
    Dallimore, Daniel
    Herd, David W.
    Short, Tim
    Anderson, Brian J.
    PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 2008, 24 (08) : 529 - 533
  • [39] Higher Mallampati Scores Are Not Associated with More Adverse Events During Pediatric Procedural Sedation and Analgesia
    Iyer, Maya S.
    Pitetti, Raymond D.
    Vitale, Melissa
    WESTERN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2018, 19 (02) : 430 - 436
  • [40] Capnography during sedation/analgesia in the pediatric emergency department
    McQuillen, KK
    Steele, DW
    PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 2000, 16 (06) : 401 - 404