Effects of native language on perceptual sensitivity to phonetic cues

被引:12
|
作者
Brandmeyer, Alex [1 ]
Desain, Peter W. M. [1 ]
McQueen, James M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Donders Inst Brain Cognit & Behav, NL-6500 HE Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Inst Behav Sci, NL-6500 HE Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Max Planck Inst Psycholinguist, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
mismatch negativity; native language; phonetics; speech perception; second language; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY MMN; ONSET-TIME; SPEECH; REPRESENTATIONS; DISCRIMINATION; PATTERNS; INFANTS; SOUNDS; BRAIN;
D O I
10.1097/WNR.0b013e32835542cd
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The present study used electrophysiological and behavioral measures to investigate the perception of an English stop consonant contrast by native English listeners and by native Dutch listeners who were highly proficient in English. A /ba/-/pa/ continuum was created from a naturally produced /pa/ token by removing successive periods of aspiration, thus reducing the voice onset time. Although aspiration is a relevant cue for distinguishing voiced and unvoiced labial stop consonants (/b/ and /p/) in English, prevoicing is the primary cue used to distinguish between these categories in Dutch. In the electrophysiological experiment, participants listened to oddball sequences containing the standard /pa/ stimulus and one of three deviant stimuli while the mismatch-negativity response was measured. Participants then completed an identification task on the same stimuli. The results showed that native English participants were more sensitive to reductions in aspiration than native Dutch participants, as indicated by shifts in the category boundary, by differing within-group patterns of mismatch-negativity responses, and by larger mean evoked potential amplitudes in the native English group for two of the three deviant stimuli. This between-group difference in the sensorineural processing of aspiration cues indicates that native language experience alters the way in which the acoustic features of speech are processed in the auditory brain, even following extensive second-language training. NeuroReport 23:653-657 (C) 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health vertical bar Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
引用
收藏
页码:653 / 657
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Does Native Language Matter in Perceptual Ratings of Dysarthria?
    Kim, Yunjung
    Thompson, Austin
    Lee, Seung Jin
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2024, 67 (09): : 2842 - 2855
  • [33] Lexical exposure to native language dialects can improve non-native phonetic discrimination
    Olmstead, Annie J.
    Viswanathan, Navin
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2018, 25 (02) : 725 - 731
  • [34] Determining Native Language and Deception Using Phonetic Features and Classifier Combination
    Gosztolya, Gabor
    Grosz, Tamos
    Busa-Fekete, Robert
    Toth, Laszlo
    17TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL SPEECH COMMUNICATION ASSOCIATION (INTERSPEECH 2016), VOLS 1-5: UNDERSTANDING SPEECH PROCESSING IN HUMANS AND MACHINES, 2016, : 2418 - 2422
  • [35] Lexical exposure to native language dialects can improve non-native phonetic discrimination
    Annie J. Olmstead
    Navin Viswanathan
    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2018, 25 : 725 - 731
  • [36] Intonational Cues to Segmental Contrasts in the Native Language Facilitate the Processing of Intonational Cues to Lexical Stress in the Second Language
    Kim, Hyoju
    Tremblay, Annie
    FRONTIERS IN COMMUNICATION, 2022, 7
  • [37] Phonetic Effects in the Perception of VOT in a Prevoicing Language
    Kharlamov, Viktor
    BRAIN SCIENCES, 2022, 12 (04)
  • [38] Effects of phonotactic predictability on sensitivity to phonetic detail
    Whang, James
    LABORATORY PHONOLOGY, 2019, 10 (01): : 1 - 28
  • [39] The perceptual flow of phonetic information
    Steven Greenberg
    Thomas U. Christiansen
    Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2019, 81 : 884 - 896
  • [40] Perceptual learning of phonetic convergence
    Dias, James W.
    Vazquez, Theresa C.
    Rosenblum, Lawrence D.
    SPEECH COMMUNICATION, 2021, 133 : 1 - 8