Improving the efficacy of mammography screening: the potential and challenge of developing new computer-aided detection approaches

被引:11
|
作者
Qian, Wei [1 ]
Sun, Wenqing [1 ]
Zheng, Bin [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas El Paso, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, El Paso, TX 79968 USA
[2] Univ Oklahoma, Sch Elect & Comp Engn, Norman, OK 73019 USA
关键词
beast cancer screening; cancer risk prediction model; computer-aided detection for breast cancer; early cancer detection and treatment; risk analysis; BREAST-CANCER RISK; ASSESSMENT MODELS; DENSITY; PERFORMANCE; RADIOMICS; FEATURES; TEXTURE; MASSES; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1586/17434440.2015.1068115
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
In this editorial article, we share our visions of how to improve the efficacy of breast cancer screening using quantitative image feature analysis methods with the medical imaging research community. Although earlier cancer detection and treatment can help reduce the mortality rates of patients with breast cancer, the most existing long-term (or lifetime) risk models do not have clinically acceptable discriminatory power at the individual level to select women for current screening. Because of such a clinical dilemma and low efficacy of breast cancer screening, it is of great importance to establish a new and more effective personalized breast cancer screening paradigm. The new computer-aided detection (CAD) approach can be applied in two application fields: analyzing negative mammograms can provide useful information to assess cancer risk, and implementing case-based cancer risk scores can develop an adaptive CAD cueing method to yield higher sensitivity and lower false-positive detection rates.
引用
收藏
页码:497 / 499
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Mammography screening using independent double reading with consensus: Is there a potential benefit for computer-aided detection?
    Skaane, Per
    Kshirsagar, Ashwini
    Hofvind, Solveig
    Jahr, Gunnar
    Castellino, Ronald A.
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2012, 53 (03) : 241 - 248
  • [32] Computer-aided screening mammography - The authors reply
    Fenton, Joshua J.
    Barlow, William E.
    Elmore, Joann G.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 357 (01): : 85 - 85
  • [33] False Positive Marks on Unsuspicious Screening Mammography with Computer-Aided Detection
    Mahoney, Mary C.
    Meganathan, Karthikeyan
    JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2011, 24 (05) : 772 - 777
  • [34] Computer-aided detection in oncologic imaging: Screening mammography as a case study
    Castellino, RA
    CANCER JOURNAL, 2002, 8 (02): : 93 - 99
  • [35] Improvement in sensitivity of screening mammography with computer-aided detection: A multiinstitutional trial
    Brem, RF
    Baum, J
    Lechner, M
    Kaplan, S
    Souders, S
    Naul, LG
    Hoffmeister, J
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2003, 181 (03) : 687 - 693
  • [36] Impact of computer-aided detection (CAD) in a regional screening mammography program
    Cupples, TE
    RADIOLOGY, 2001, 221 : 520 - 520
  • [37] The Interplay of Attention Economics and Computer-Aided Detection Marks in Screening Mammography
    Schwartz, Tayler M.
    Sridharan, Radhika
    Wei, Wei
    Lukyanchenko, Olga
    Geiser, William
    Whitman, Gary J.
    Haygood, Tamara Miner
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2016: IMAGE PERCEPTION, OBSERVER PERFORMANCE, AND TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2016, 9787
  • [38] How Widely Is Computer-Aided Detection Used in Screening and Diagnostic Mammography?
    Rao, Vijay M.
    Levin, David C.
    Parker, Laurence
    Cavanaugh, Barbara
    Frangos, Andrea J.
    Sunshine, Jonathan H.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2010, 7 (10) : 802 - 805
  • [39] False Positive Marks on Unsuspicious Screening Mammography with Computer-Aided Detection
    Mary C. Mahoney
    Karthikeyan Meganathan
    Journal of Digital Imaging, 2011, 24 : 772 - 777
  • [40] Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Screening Mammography With and Without Computer-Aided Detection
    Lehman, Constance D.
    Wellman, Robert D.
    Buist, Diana S. M.
    Kerlikowske, Karla
    Tosteson, Anna N. A.
    Miglioretti, Diana L.
    JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2015, 175 (11) : 1828 - 1837