The Benefit of a Wireless Contralateral Routing of Signals (CROS) Microphone in Unilateral Cochlear Implant Recipients

被引:10
|
作者
Kurien, George [1 ]
Hwang, Euna [1 ]
Smilsky, Kari [1 ]
Smith, Leah [1 ]
Lin, Vincent Y. W. [1 ]
Nedzelski, Julian [1 ]
Chen, Joseph M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
Contralateral routing of signals; speech perception; unilateral cochlear implant; wireless; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; SPEECH RECOGNITION; LOCALIZATION; PRIORITIES; SYSTEM; USERS; NOISE;
D O I
10.1097/MAO.0000000000002078
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Assess speech outcomes in unilateral cochlear implant (CI) recipients after addition of a wireless contralateral routing of signals (CROS) microphone. Study Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting: Ambulatory. Patients: Sixteen adult unilateral CI users with nonserviceable hearing on the contralateral side were recruited. Those with AzBio sentence scores of 40 to 80% or Hearing in Noise Test - Quiet (HINT-Q) scores of 60 to 90% with a CI alone were eligible participants. Intervention: Speech testing was carried out with the CROS on and off. Main Outcome Measure: Speech recognition. Results: In the consonant-nucleus-consonant test presented in quiet from the front, word scores were 64.4 (CI) and 63.8% (CI + CROS) (p = 0.72), and phoneme scores were 80.2 (CI) and 80.8% (CI + CROS) (p = 0.65). In AzBio sentence testing in quiet, with the signals projected from the contralateral, front, or ipsilateral to the CI, speech perception with the CI alone was 60.8, 75.9, and 79.1%. With the addition of the CROS microphone, using the same speaker arrangement, speech perception was 69.8 (p < 0.05), 71.8 (p = 0.05), and 71.8 (p < 0.05). In AzBio sentence testing in noise, speech perception with the CI alone was 18.6, 45.3, and 56.3% when signals were projected from contralateral, front, and ipsilateral sides to the CI. The addition of the CROS microphone led to speech perception of 45.3 (p < 0.05), 45.3 (p = 0.86), and 51.4% (p = 0.27) in the same paradigm. Conclusions: Addition of a wireless CROS microphone to a unilateral CI recipient can improve users' perception of speech in both quiet and noise if speech signals come from the deaf ear, mitigating the head shadow effect.
引用
收藏
页码:E82 / E88
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Binaural-bimodal hearing: Concomitant use of a unilateral cochlear implant and a contralateral hearing aid
    Luntz, M
    Shpak, T
    Weiss, H
    ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 2005, 125 (08) : 863 - 869
  • [42] Parental insights on Hearing Aid Usage in the ear Contralateral to unilateral Cochlear Implant among Children
    Sahana, P.
    Chaithra, M. C.
    Manjula, P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2023, 172
  • [43] Evaluation of the Bimodal Benefit in a Large Cohort of Cochlear Implant Subjects Using a Contralateral Hearing Aid
    Illg, Angelika
    Bojanowicz, Margarete
    Lesinski-Schiedat, Anke
    Lenarz, Thomas
    Buechner, Andreas
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2014, 35 (09) : E240 - E244
  • [44] Frequency Following Response and Speech Recognition Benefit for Combining a Cochlear Implant and Contralateral Hearing Aid
    Kessler, David M.
    Ananthakrishnan, Saradha
    Smith, Spencer B.
    D'Onofrio, Kristen
    Gifford, Rene H.
    TRENDS IN HEARING, 2020, 24
  • [45] Contralateral hearing aid use in adult cochlear implant recipients: retrospective analysis of auditory outcomes
    Mertens, Griet
    Andries, Ellen
    Clement, Charis
    Cochet, Ellen
    Hofkens-Van den Brandt, Anouk
    Jacquemin, Laure
    Joossen, Iris
    Vermeersch, Hanne
    Lammers, Marc Jan-Willem
    Van Rompaey, Vincent
    Vanderveken, Olivier
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2024, 63 (07) : 543 - 550
  • [46] Low-Frequency Pitch Perception in Cochlear Implant Recipients With Normal Hearing in the Contralateral Ear
    Dillon, Margaret T.
    Buss, Emily
    Rooth, Meredith A.
    King, English R.
    Pillsbury, Harold C.
    Brown, Kevin D.
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2019, 62 (08): : 2860 - 2871
  • [47] Bone-anchored hearing system, contralateral routing of signals hearing aid or cochlear implant: what is best in single-sided deafness?
    Jakob, Till F.
    Speck, Iva
    Rauch, Ann-Kathrin
    Hassepass, Frederike
    Ketterer, Manuel C.
    Beck, Rainer
    Aschendorff, Antje
    Wesarg, Thomas
    Arndt, Susan
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2022, 279 (01) : 149 - 158
  • [48] Bone-anchored hearing system, contralateral routing of signals hearing aid or cochlear implant: what is best in single-sided deafness?
    Till F. Jakob
    Iva Speck
    Ann-Kathrin Rauch
    Frederike Hassepass
    Manuel C. Ketterer
    Rainer Beck
    Antje Aschendorff
    Thomas Wesarg
    Susan Arndt
    European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2022, 279 : 149 - 158
  • [49] Automatic segmentation of intra-cochlear anatomy in post-implantation CT of unilateral cochlear implant recipients
    Reda, Fitsum A.
    McRackan, Theodore R.
    Labadie, Robert F.
    Dawant, Benoit M.
    Noble, Jack H.
    MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS, 2014, 18 (03) : 605 - 615
  • [50] Benefit and predictive factors for speech perception outcomes in pediatric bilateral cochlear implant recipients
    Chang, Young-Soo
    Hong, Sung Hwa
    Kim, Eun Yeon
    Choi, Ji Eun
    Chung, Won-Ho
    Cho, Yang-Sun
    Moon, Il Joon
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2019, 85 (05) : 571 - 577