The Benefit of a Wireless Contralateral Routing of Signals (CROS) Microphone in Unilateral Cochlear Implant Recipients

被引:10
|
作者
Kurien, George [1 ]
Hwang, Euna [1 ]
Smilsky, Kari [1 ]
Smith, Leah [1 ]
Lin, Vincent Y. W. [1 ]
Nedzelski, Julian [1 ]
Chen, Joseph M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
Contralateral routing of signals; speech perception; unilateral cochlear implant; wireless; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; SPEECH RECOGNITION; LOCALIZATION; PRIORITIES; SYSTEM; USERS; NOISE;
D O I
10.1097/MAO.0000000000002078
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Assess speech outcomes in unilateral cochlear implant (CI) recipients after addition of a wireless contralateral routing of signals (CROS) microphone. Study Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting: Ambulatory. Patients: Sixteen adult unilateral CI users with nonserviceable hearing on the contralateral side were recruited. Those with AzBio sentence scores of 40 to 80% or Hearing in Noise Test - Quiet (HINT-Q) scores of 60 to 90% with a CI alone were eligible participants. Intervention: Speech testing was carried out with the CROS on and off. Main Outcome Measure: Speech recognition. Results: In the consonant-nucleus-consonant test presented in quiet from the front, word scores were 64.4 (CI) and 63.8% (CI + CROS) (p = 0.72), and phoneme scores were 80.2 (CI) and 80.8% (CI + CROS) (p = 0.65). In AzBio sentence testing in quiet, with the signals projected from the contralateral, front, or ipsilateral to the CI, speech perception with the CI alone was 60.8, 75.9, and 79.1%. With the addition of the CROS microphone, using the same speaker arrangement, speech perception was 69.8 (p < 0.05), 71.8 (p = 0.05), and 71.8 (p < 0.05). In AzBio sentence testing in noise, speech perception with the CI alone was 18.6, 45.3, and 56.3% when signals were projected from contralateral, front, and ipsilateral sides to the CI. The addition of the CROS microphone led to speech perception of 45.3 (p < 0.05), 45.3 (p = 0.86), and 51.4% (p = 0.27) in the same paradigm. Conclusions: Addition of a wireless CROS microphone to a unilateral CI recipient can improve users' perception of speech in both quiet and noise if speech signals come from the deaf ear, mitigating the head shadow effect.
引用
收藏
页码:E82 / E88
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comment on the Paper by Weder et al. Entitled 'Benefit of a Contralateral Routing of Signal Device for Unilateral Cochlear Implant Users'
    Kuthubutheen, Jafri
    Lin, Vincent
    Chen, Joseph
    AUDIOLOGY AND NEURO-OTOLOGY, 2015, 20 (05) : 337 - 337
  • [22] Comment on the Paper by Weder et al. Entitled 'Benefit of a Contralateral Routing of Signal Device for Unilateral Cochlear Implant Users' Reply
    Weder, Stefan
    AUDIOLOGY AND NEURO-OTOLOGY, 2015, 20 (05) : 338 - 338
  • [23] A directional remote-microphone for bimodal cochlear implant recipients
    Vroegop, Jantien L.
    Homans, Nienke C.
    Goedegebure, Andre
    van der Schroeff, Marc P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2018, 57 (11) : 858 - 863
  • [24] Application of Digital Remote Wireless Microphone Technology in Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Recipients
    Wesarg, Thomas
    Stelzig, Yvonne
    Hilgert-Becker, Dan
    Kathage, Bjorn
    Wiebe, Konstantin
    Aschendorff, Antje
    Arndt, Susan
    Speck, Iva
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF AUDIOLOGY, 2020, 31 (04) : 246 - 256
  • [25] Assessment of the contralateral routing of signal system in unilateral cochlear implantation
    Guevara, N.
    Grech, C.
    Gahide, I
    Gallego, S.
    CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2015, 40 (06) : 535 - 544
  • [26] Qualification of unilateral cochlear implant recipients for a second device
    Drela, Maria
    Haber, Karolina
    Wrukowska, Iwona
    Puricelli, Michael
    Sinkiewicz, Anna
    Brus, Jerzy
    Tyra, Justyna
    Mierzwinski, Jozef
    POLISH JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2019, 73 (06): : 7 - 15
  • [27] Benefit of contralateral hearing aid in adult cochlear implant bearers
    Bouccara, D.
    Blanchet, E.
    Waterlot, P. E.
    Smadja, M.
    Frachet, B.
    Meyer, B.
    Sterkers, O.
    EUROPEAN ANNALS OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK DISEASES, 2016, 133 (03) : 161 - 165
  • [28] Remote Microphone Systems for Cochlear Implant Recipients in Small Group Settings
    Miller, Sharon
    Wolfe, Jace
    Neumann, Sara
    Schafer, Erin C.
    Galster, Jason
    Agrawal, Smita
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF AUDIOLOGY, 2022, 33 (03) : 142 - 148
  • [29] Auditory Training in Patients With Unilateral Cochlear Implant and Contralateral Acoustic Stimulation
    Zhang, Ting
    Dorman, Michael F.
    Fu, Qian-Jie
    Spahr, Anthony J.
    EAR AND HEARING, 2012, 33 (06): : E70 - E79
  • [30] Residual Hearing Does Not Influence the Effectiveness of Beamforming when Using a Cochlear Implant in Conjunction with Contralateral Routing of Signals
    Stronks, Hendrik Christiaan
    Briaire, Jeroen Johannes
    Frijns, Johan Hubertus Maria
    AUDIOLOGY AND NEUROTOLOGY, 2023, 28 (04) : 262 - 271