Validation and Comparison of the 7th Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System and Other Prognostic Models to Predict Relapse-Free Survival in Asian Patients with Parotid Cancer

被引:11
|
作者
Lu, Chang-Hsien [1 ]
Liu, Chien-Ting [2 ]
Chang, Pei-Hung [3 ]
Yeh, Kun-Yun [3 ]
Hung, Chia-Yen [4 ]
Li, Shau-Hsuan [2 ]
Lin, Yung-Chang [4 ]
Yeh, Ta-Sen [5 ,6 ]
Hung, Yung-Shin [4 ]
Chou, Wen-Chi [4 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Chiayi, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[3] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Keelung, Taiwan
[4] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Linkou, Taiwan
[5] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Surg, Linkou, Taiwan
[6] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Grad Inst Clin Med Sci, Taoyuan, Taiwan
来源
JOURNAL OF CANCER | 2016年 / 7卷 / 13期
关键词
parotid cancer; prognostic score; relapse-free survival; validation; comparison; MAJOR SALIVARY-GLANDS; CARCINOMA; TUMORS; RECURRENCE; HEAD;
D O I
10.7150/jca.15692
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Parotid cancer is a rare malignancy characterized by a heterogeneous histologic subtype and distinct biologic behavior. The present study aimed to externally validate and compare the performances of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system (7th Edition), Carrillo score, and Vander Poorten score in the prediction of tumor relapse probability in a large cohort of Asian parotid cancer patients. Methods: In total, 261 patients who underwent primary surgery for localized parotid cancer between 2002 and 2014 at the four affiliated hospitals of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital were identified. All patients were categorized into different prognostic groups defined by these three models for the comparison of associated relapse-free survival (RFS) rates. Results: The 5-year overall survival, cancer-specific survival, and RFS rates were 82.9%, 86.2%, and 77.5%, respectively. All three models were significantly powerful in discriminating between the tumors of patients in the lowest and highest risk groups. The c-statistic for predicting the 5-year RFS was 0.74 for the AJCC staging, 0.74 for the Vander Poorten score, and 0.62 for the Carrillo score. The AJCC staging and Vander Poorten score gave significantly high c-statistic values compared to the Carrillo score. Conclusion: Our data validated that all three models are significantly powerful in discriminating tumor relapse between patients in lowest and highest risk groups. The AJCC system and Vander Poorten score proved superior to the Carrillo score, and showed similar performances in discriminating between the 5-year RFS probabilities of low and high-risk Asian parotid cancer patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1833 / 1841
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Impact of American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition classification on staging and survival of patients with melanoma
    Kanaki, Theodora
    Stang, Andreas
    Gutzmer, Ralf
    Zimmer, Lisa
    Chorti, Eleftheria
    Sucker, Antje
    Ugurel, Selma
    Hadaschik, Eva
    Graeger, Nikolai S.
    Satzger, Imke
    Schadendorf, Dirk
    Livingstone, Elisabeth
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2019, 119 : 18 - 29
  • [42] Introduction of the 7th Edition Eyelid Carcinoma Classification System From the American Joint Committee on Cancer-International Union Against Cancer Staging Manual
    Ainbinder, Darryl J.
    Esmaeli, Bita
    Groo, Stephen C.
    Finger, Paul T.
    Brooks, Joseph P.
    ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2009, 133 (08) : 1256 - 1261
  • [43] ASO Visual Abstract: The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Breast Cancer Staging 8th Edition is More Reflective of Cancer Biology Than the 7th Edition
    Young, Jessica
    Asaoka, Mariko
    Ghasemi, Farhad
    Chida, Kohei
    Roy, Arya Mariam
    Yan, Li
    Hakamada, Kenichi
    Takabe, Kazuaki
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2025, : 3341 - 3342
  • [44] Prognostic Validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th Staging System in 24,014 Korean Patients with Breast Cancer
    Kim, Isaac
    Choi, Hee Jun
    Ryu, Jai Min
    Lee, Se Kyung
    Yu, Jong Han
    Kim, Seok Won
    Nam, Seok Jin
    Lee, Jeong Eon
    JOURNAL OF BREAST CANCER, 2018, 21 (02) : 173 - 181
  • [45] Comparison of the 7th and the 8th Editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Systems for Ampulla of Vater Carcinoma
    Gao, Haijuan
    Chandan, Vishal
    Johnson, Cary
    Lu, Yunxia
    Li, Xiaodong
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2021, 101 (SUPPL 1) : 1041 - 1042
  • [46] Comparison of the 7th and the 8th Editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Systems for Ampulla of Vater Carcinoma
    Gao, Haijuan
    Chandan, Vishal
    Johnson, Cary
    Lu, Yunxia
    Li, Xiaodong
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2021, 34 (SUPPL 2) : 1041 - 1042
  • [47] Multinational validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition pancreatic cancer staging system in a pancreas head cancer cohort
    Kwon, Wooil
    He, Jin
    Higuchi, Ryota
    Son, Donghee
    Lee, Seung Yeoun
    Kim, Jaeri
    Kim, Hongbeom
    Kim, Sun-Whe
    Wolfgang, Christopher L.
    Cameron, John L.
    Yamamoto, Masakazu
    Jang, Jin-Young
    JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES, 2018, 25 (09) : 418 - 427
  • [48] The 7th/8th American Joint Committee on Cancer and the Modified Union for International Cancer Control Staging System for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Kim, In-Gyu
    Hu, Xu-Guang
    Wang, Hee-Jung
    Kim, Bong-Wan
    Hong, Sung Yeon
    Shen, Xue-Yin
    YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 60 (02) : 140 - 147
  • [49] A retrospective prognostic evaluation analysis using the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for breast cancer
    Lee, Sae Byul
    Sohn, Guiyun
    Kim, Jisun
    Chung, Il Yong
    Lee, Jong Won
    Kim, Hee Jeong
    Ko, Beom Seok
    Son, Byung Ho
    Ahn, Sei-Hyun
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2018, 169 (02) : 257 - 266
  • [50] A retrospective prognostic evaluation analysis using the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for breast cancer
    Sae Byul Lee
    Guiyun Sohn
    Jisun Kim
    Il Yong Chung
    Jong Won Lee
    Hee Jeong Kim
    Beom Seok Ko
    Byung Ho Son
    Sei-Hyun Ahn
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2018, 169 : 257 - 266