Validation and Comparison of the 7th Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System and Other Prognostic Models to Predict Relapse-Free Survival in Asian Patients with Parotid Cancer

被引:11
|
作者
Lu, Chang-Hsien [1 ]
Liu, Chien-Ting [2 ]
Chang, Pei-Hung [3 ]
Yeh, Kun-Yun [3 ]
Hung, Chia-Yen [4 ]
Li, Shau-Hsuan [2 ]
Lin, Yung-Chang [4 ]
Yeh, Ta-Sen [5 ,6 ]
Hung, Yung-Shin [4 ]
Chou, Wen-Chi [4 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Chiayi, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[3] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Keelung, Taiwan
[4] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Linkou, Taiwan
[5] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Surg, Linkou, Taiwan
[6] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Grad Inst Clin Med Sci, Taoyuan, Taiwan
来源
JOURNAL OF CANCER | 2016年 / 7卷 / 13期
关键词
parotid cancer; prognostic score; relapse-free survival; validation; comparison; MAJOR SALIVARY-GLANDS; CARCINOMA; TUMORS; RECURRENCE; HEAD;
D O I
10.7150/jca.15692
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Parotid cancer is a rare malignancy characterized by a heterogeneous histologic subtype and distinct biologic behavior. The present study aimed to externally validate and compare the performances of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system (7th Edition), Carrillo score, and Vander Poorten score in the prediction of tumor relapse probability in a large cohort of Asian parotid cancer patients. Methods: In total, 261 patients who underwent primary surgery for localized parotid cancer between 2002 and 2014 at the four affiliated hospitals of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital were identified. All patients were categorized into different prognostic groups defined by these three models for the comparison of associated relapse-free survival (RFS) rates. Results: The 5-year overall survival, cancer-specific survival, and RFS rates were 82.9%, 86.2%, and 77.5%, respectively. All three models were significantly powerful in discriminating between the tumors of patients in the lowest and highest risk groups. The c-statistic for predicting the 5-year RFS was 0.74 for the AJCC staging, 0.74 for the Vander Poorten score, and 0.62 for the Carrillo score. The AJCC staging and Vander Poorten score gave significantly high c-statistic values compared to the Carrillo score. Conclusion: Our data validated that all three models are significantly powerful in discriminating tumor relapse between patients in lowest and highest risk groups. The AJCC system and Vander Poorten score proved superior to the Carrillo score, and showed similar performances in discriminating between the 5-year RFS probabilities of low and high-risk Asian parotid cancer patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1833 / 1841
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of the 7th and 8th edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging systems for breast cancer patients: a Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Analysis
    Shao, Nan
    Xie, Chuanbo
    Shi, Yawei
    Ye, Runyi
    Long, Jianting
    Shi, Huijuan
    Shan, Zhen
    Thompson, Alastair M.
    Lin, Ying
    CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2019, 11 : 1433 - 1442
  • [32] Assessment of the American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th Edition Staging for Localised Prostate Cancer in Asia Treated with External Beam Radiotherapy
    Wong, Meihua
    Yip, Connie
    Li, Huihua
    Tan, Terence
    Kanesvaran, Ravindran
    Chowbay, Balram
    Tan, Puay Hoon
    Tan, Min-Han
    Wong, Fuh Yong
    ANNALS ACADEMY OF MEDICINE SINGAPORE, 2014, 43 (10) : 484 - 491
  • [33] The solved and unresolved issues of melanoma staging: A comparison of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 7th versus 8th edition.
    Bajaj, Shirin
    Collado, Anthony
    Moran, Una
    Donnelly, Douglas MacArthur
    Johannet, Paul
    Shapiro, Richard L.
    Berman, Russell S.
    Weber, Jeffrey S.
    Zhong, Judy
    Osman, Iman
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 37 (15)
  • [34] Assessment of the Prognostic Staging System of American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th Edition for Breast Cancer: Comparisons with the Conventional Anatomic Staging System
    Kim, Eun Jin
    Park, Hyung Seok
    Kim, Jee Ye
    Kim, Seung Il
    Cho, Young-Up
    Park, Byeong-Woo
    JOURNAL OF BREAST CANCER, 2020, 23 (01) : 59 - 68
  • [35] Validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition staging system for the pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
    Shin, Dong Woo
    Lee, Jong-Chan
    Kim, Jaihwan
    Woo, Sang Myung
    Lee, Woo Jin
    Han, Sung-Sik
    Park, Sang-Jae
    Choi, Kui Son
    Cha, Hyo Soung
    Yoon, Yoo-Seok
    Han, Ho-Seong
    Hong, Eun Kyung
    Hwang, Jin-Hyeok
    EJSO, 2019, 45 (11): : 2159 - 2165
  • [36] Prognostic performance of the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition of the TNM staging system in patients with early oral tongue cancer
    Amit, Moran
    Tam, Samantha
    Takahashi, Hideaki
    Choi, Karen Y.
    Zafereo, Mark
    Bell, Diana
    Weber, Randal S.
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2019, 41 (05): : 1270 - 1276
  • [37] Reply to Validation of the Seventh Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM Staging System for Gastric Cancer
    Song, Kyo Young
    Jung, Hun
    Park, Cho Hyun
    CANCER, 2012, 118 (05) : 1466 - 1467
  • [38] Analysis and Comparison of the 7th Edition American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Nodal Staging System for Metastatic Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
    Jonathan R. Clark
    Pavlina Rumcheva
    Michael J Veness
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2012, 19 : 4252 - 4258
  • [39] Analysis and Comparison of the 7th Edition American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Nodal Staging System for Metastatic Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
    Clark, Jonathan R.
    Rumcheva, Pavlina
    Veness, Michael J.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 19 (13) : 4252 - 4258
  • [40] Independent Validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th Edition Prostate Cancer Staging Classification
    Bhindi, Bimal
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    Rangel, Laureano J.
    Mason, Ross J.
    Gettman, Matthew T.
    Frank, Igor
    Tollefson, Matthew K.
    Lin, Daniel W.
    Thompson, R. Houston
    Boorjian, Stephen A.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 198 (06): : 1287 - 1295