Single-subject clinical-outcome research: designs, data, effect sizes, and analyses

被引:123
|
作者
Robey, RR
Schultz, MC
Crawford, AB
Sinner, CA
机构
[1] Univ Virginia, Commun Disorders Program, Charlottesville, VA 22903 USA
[2] So Illinois Univ, Carbondale, IL 62901 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/026870399402028
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
In the last 20 years, single-subject research designs have become important forms of aphasia-treatment research for assessing the effectiveness of treatment on a subject-by-subject (or patient-by-patient) basis. In that time, several important developments in the statistical literature centring on the reliability and validity of single-subject research have occurred. This work assesses the state of aphasia-treatment single-subject research in the context of that scholarship and proposes recommendations for future applications through a tutorial-like presentation. This paper details the analysis of published single subject results and proposes recommendations concerning future applications of single-subject designs. The work focuses on four domains: designs, data, effect sizes, and analyses. The findings indicate that aphasia-treatment single-subject studies, which are well designed for the most part, yield a short series of autocorrelated data manifesting generally large treatment effects. However, only one analysis satisfactorily controlled Type I and Type II errors under typical clinical-aphasiology applications. That procedure, ITSACORR, is easily accomplished and it expresses outcome in familiar terms. To facilitate understanding, the review promotes a hands-on understanding of the various analysis options through worked examples and clarifies the (in)appropriateness of each procedure for clinical applications. Although the focus of the work is treatment for aphasia, the central thesis has general application across disorder categories.
引用
收藏
页码:445 / 473
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Single-subject designs in special education: advantages and limitations
    Alnahdi, Ghaleb H.
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SPECIAL EDUCATIONAL NEEDS, 2015, 15 (04): : 257 - 265
  • [42] A Tutorial on Computing Bayes Factors for Single-Subject Designs
    de Vries, Rivka M.
    Hartogs, Bregje M. A.
    Morey, Richard D.
    BEHAVIOR THERAPY, 2015, 46 (06) : 809 - 823
  • [43] Single-Subject Research in Gifted Education
    Simonsen, Brandi
    Little, Catherine A.
    GIFTED CHILD QUARTERLY, 2011, 55 (02) : 158 - 162
  • [44] A GENERAL STRATEGY FOR SINGLE-SUBJECT RESEARCH
    HOLTGRAVE, DR
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1989, 65 (02) : 687 - 690
  • [45] The Influence of the Design Matrix on Treatment Effect Estimates in the Quantitative Analyses of Single-Subject Experimental Design Research
    Moeyaert, Mariola
    Ugille, Maaike
    Ferron, John M.
    Beretvas, S. Natasha
    Van den Noortgate, Wim
    BEHAVIOR MODIFICATION, 2014, 38 (05) : 665 - 704
  • [46] SINGLE-SUBJECT EXPERIMENTAL-DESIGNS FROM PURE AND APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH
    BAKER, LJV
    PHENOTYPIC RESPONSES AND INDIVIDUALITY IN AQUATIC ECTOTHERMS, 1989, : 115 - 119
  • [47] Single-subject research designs in pediatric rehabilitation: a valuable step towards knowledge translation
    Romeiser-Logan, Lynne
    Slaughter, Rebecca
    Hickman, Robbin
    DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICINE AND CHILD NEUROLOGY, 2017, 59 (06): : 574 - 580
  • [48] Single-Subject Designs and Practice-Based Research in Palliative Care: A Letter to the Editor
    Gerhart, James
    Hand, Dennis
    Hoerger, Michael
    O'Mahony, Sean
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2019, 57 (03) : E3 - E5
  • [49] ANTHROZOOS RESEARCH (VOLUMES IV) WITH NOTES ON CASE-STUDY AND SINGLE-SUBJECT DESIGNS
    RAJECKI, DW
    BECK, AM
    ANTHROZOOS, 1993, 6 (03): : 154 - 165
  • [50] Single-subject designs as a tool for evidence-based clinical practice: Are they unrecognised and undervalued?
    Perdices, Michael
    Tate, Robyn L.
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL REHABILITATION, 2009, 19 (06) : 904 - 927