Transportation Benefit-Cost Analysis Lessons from Cal-B/C

被引:1
|
作者
Williges, Chris [1 ]
Mahdavi, Mahmoud [2 ]
机构
[1] Syst Metr Grp Inc, San Francisco, CA 94111 USA
[2] Calif Dept Transportat, Off Transportat Econ, Div Transportat Planning, Sacramento, CA 95814 USA
关键词
D O I
10.3141/2079-11
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) assesses more than 100 transportation projects annually for its State Transportation Improvement Program, one of the largest such programs in the country. Caltrans relies on benefit-cost analysis as one of several performance factors, and evaluations must be completed in a few weeks. Caltrans developed a spreadsheet model, Cal-B/C, to provide a common benefit-cost framework and facilitate rapid project evaluation. The model is based on extensive theoretical reviews but is intended to keep the analysis simple. Cal-B/C incorporates rules of thumb to accommodate projects with little upfront evaluation. It can also use summary data from microsimulation and travel demand models. Although this design supports analysis with minimal data, Caltrans has found that the need for accurate and consistent data complicates project evaluation. This paper presents an example of how California applies benefit-cost analysis for objective project appraisals. The paper describes the motivation for Cal-B/C, its structure, applications, and continued evolution. Particular attention is paid to a recent evaluation of projects proposed for a $4.5 billion infrastructure bond measure. The paper also offers lessons for applied transportation performance analysis and proposes areas for further research.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 87
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] An aggregate measure for benefit-cost analysis
    Zerbe, Richard O., Jr.
    Bauman, Yoram
    Finkle, Aaron
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 58 (03) : 449 - 461
  • [42] Benefit-cost analysis and the environment - Response
    Arrow, KJ
    Cropper, ML
    Eads, GC
    Hahn, RW
    Lave, LB
    Noll, RG
    Portney, PR
    Russell, M
    Schmalensee, R
    Smith, VK
    Stavins, RN
    SCIENCE, 1996, 272 (5268) : 1572 - 1573
  • [43] Benefit-Cost Analysis for Climate Action
    Bureau, Dominique
    Quinet, Alain
    Schubert, Katheline
    JOURNAL OF BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS, 2021, 12 (03) : 494 - 517
  • [44] From Benefit-Cost Analysis to Social Welfare: A Pragmatic Approach
    Ferranna, Maddalena
    Hammitt, James K.
    Robinson, Lisa A.
    JOURNAL OF BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS, 2025,
  • [45] The incompatibility of benefit-cost analysis with sustainability science
    Anderson, Mark
    Teisl, Mario
    Noblet, Caroline
    Klein, Sharon
    SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2015, 10 (01) : 33 - 41
  • [46] Dynamic Benefit-Cost Analysis for Uncertain Futures
    Dudley, Susan E.
    Perez, Daniel R.
    Mannix, Brian F.
    Carrigan, Christopher
    JOURNAL OF BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS, 2019, 10 (02) : 206 - 225
  • [47] The benefit-cost analysis on construction project feasibility
    Ma, Yanting
    Ma, Chunjie
    ARCHITECTURE, BUILDING MATERIALS AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, PTS 1-4, 2013, 357-360 : 2312 - 2315
  • [48] BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS OF LOCAL WATER SUPPLY
    STOBER, WJ
    FALK, LH
    LAND ECONOMICS, 1967, 43 (03) : 328 - 335
  • [49] BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS OF VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION PROGRAM
    CONLEY, RW
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCES, 1969, 4 (02) : 226 - 252
  • [50] Environmental economics: a critique of benefit-cost analysis
    Neuteleers, Stijn
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2009, 18 (01) : 156 - 157