Transportation Benefit-Cost Analysis Lessons from Cal-B/C

被引:1
|
作者
Williges, Chris [1 ]
Mahdavi, Mahmoud [2 ]
机构
[1] Syst Metr Grp Inc, San Francisco, CA 94111 USA
[2] Calif Dept Transportat, Off Transportat Econ, Div Transportat Planning, Sacramento, CA 95814 USA
关键词
D O I
10.3141/2079-11
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) assesses more than 100 transportation projects annually for its State Transportation Improvement Program, one of the largest such programs in the country. Caltrans relies on benefit-cost analysis as one of several performance factors, and evaluations must be completed in a few weeks. Caltrans developed a spreadsheet model, Cal-B/C, to provide a common benefit-cost framework and facilitate rapid project evaluation. The model is based on extensive theoretical reviews but is intended to keep the analysis simple. Cal-B/C incorporates rules of thumb to accommodate projects with little upfront evaluation. It can also use summary data from microsimulation and travel demand models. Although this design supports analysis with minimal data, Caltrans has found that the need for accurate and consistent data complicates project evaluation. This paper presents an example of how California applies benefit-cost analysis for objective project appraisals. The paper describes the motivation for Cal-B/C, its structure, applications, and continued evolution. Particular attention is paid to a recent evaluation of projects proposed for a $4.5 billion infrastructure bond measure. The paper also offers lessons for applied transportation performance analysis and proposes areas for further research.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 87
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Risk analysis to account for uncertainty in benefit-cost evaluations of intelligent transportation systems
    Yang, Sheng
    Shen, Luou
    Hadi, Mohammed
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2007, 2035 (2035) : 187 - 194
  • [22] The Lifecycle Benefit-Cost Analysis for a Rural Bridge Construction to Support Energy Transportation
    Dharmadhikari, Nimish
    Lee, EunSu
    Kayabas, Poyraz
    INFRASTRUCTURES, 2016, 1 (01)
  • [23] COST BIAS IN BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS - COMMENT
    STOBER, WJ
    FALK, LH
    EKELUND, RB
    SOUTHERN ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1968, 34 (04) : 563 - 568
  • [24] BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS OF FAMILY PLANNING
    BLUMSTEIN, A
    CASSIDY, RG
    SOCIO-ECONOMIC PLANNING SCIENCES, 1973, 7 (02) : 151 - 160
  • [25] Performance Bond Benefit-Cost Analysis
    Myers, Lorena
    Najafi, Fazil T.
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2011, (2228) : 3 - 10
  • [26] Evaluating Return: A Benefit-Cost Calculator for Active Transportation Projects
    Cooper, Gigi
    Danziger, Jennifer
    ITE JOURNAL-INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS, 2016, 86 (09): : 25 - 29
  • [27] IMPROVING ACCURACY OF BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS
    BORDMAN, SL
    IEEE SPECTRUM, 1973, 10 (09) : 72 - 76
  • [28] How (Not) to Lie with Benefit-Cost Analysis
    Farrow, Scott
    ECONOMISTS VOICE, 2013, 10 (01): : 45 - 50
  • [29] Principles and Standards for Benefit-Cost Analysis
    Kumru, Cagri S.
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2014, 58 (04) : 622 - 624
  • [30] Benefit-Cost Analysis of Increased Trade: An Order-of-Magnitude Estimate of the Benefit-Cost Ratio
    Feyrer, James
    Tyazhelnikov, Vladimir
    Aleman-Castilla, Benjamin
    Wong, Brad
    JOURNAL OF BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS, 2023, 14 : 108 - 135