Transportation Benefit-Cost Analysis Lessons from Cal-B/C

被引:1
|
作者
Williges, Chris [1 ]
Mahdavi, Mahmoud [2 ]
机构
[1] Syst Metr Grp Inc, San Francisco, CA 94111 USA
[2] Calif Dept Transportat, Off Transportat Econ, Div Transportat Planning, Sacramento, CA 95814 USA
关键词
D O I
10.3141/2079-11
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) assesses more than 100 transportation projects annually for its State Transportation Improvement Program, one of the largest such programs in the country. Caltrans relies on benefit-cost analysis as one of several performance factors, and evaluations must be completed in a few weeks. Caltrans developed a spreadsheet model, Cal-B/C, to provide a common benefit-cost framework and facilitate rapid project evaluation. The model is based on extensive theoretical reviews but is intended to keep the analysis simple. Cal-B/C incorporates rules of thumb to accommodate projects with little upfront evaluation. It can also use summary data from microsimulation and travel demand models. Although this design supports analysis with minimal data, Caltrans has found that the need for accurate and consistent data complicates project evaluation. This paper presents an example of how California applies benefit-cost analysis for objective project appraisals. The paper describes the motivation for Cal-B/C, its structure, applications, and continued evolution. Particular attention is paid to a recent evaluation of projects proposed for a $4.5 billion infrastructure bond measure. The paper also offers lessons for applied transportation performance analysis and proposes areas for further research.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 87
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Using STEAM for benefit-cost analysis of transportation alternatives
    DeCorla-Souza, P
    Cohen, H
    Haling, D
    Hunt, J
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION FINANCE, ECONOMICS, AND MANAGEMENT, 1998, (1649): : 63 - 71
  • [2] Using STEAM for benefit-cost analysis of transportation alternatives
    DeCorla-Souza, Patrick
    Cohen, Harry
    Haling, Dan
    Hunt, James
    [J]. Transportation Research Record, 1998, (1649): : 63 - 71
  • [3] Benefit-cost analysis and application of intelligent compaction for transportation
    Savan, Christopher M.
    Ng, Kam W.
    Ksaibati, Khaled
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION GEOTECHNICS, 2016, 9 : 57 - 68
  • [4] Using STEAM for benefit-cost analysis of transportation alternatives
    不详
    [J]. ITE JOURNAL-INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS, 1998, 68 (01): : 10 - 10
  • [5] Total cost analysis: An alternative to benefit-cost analysis in evaluating transportation alternatives
    Patrick DeCorla- Souza
    Jerry Everett
    Brian Gardner
    Michael Culp
    [J]. Transportation, 1997, 24 : 107 - 123
  • [6] Total cost analysis: An alternative to benefit-cost analysis in evaluating transportation alternatives
    DeCorlaSouza, P
    Everett, J
    Gardner, B
    Culp, M
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION, 1997, 24 (02) : 107 - 123
  • [7] BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS IN TRANSPORTATION - ECONOMIC RATIONALE OF RESOURCE ALLOCATION
    FRANKLIN, WD
    [J]. TRAFFIC QUARTERLY, 1968, 22 (01): : 69 - &
  • [8] Lifecycle Benefit-Cost Analysis of Underground Freight Transportation Systems
    Zahed, Seyed Ehsan
    Shahandashti, S. M.
    Najafi, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PIPELINE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND PRACTICE, 2018, 9 (02)
  • [9] BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS OF CODING TECHNIQUES FOR PRIMAL TRANSPORTATION ALGORITHM
    SRINIVASAN, V
    THOMPSON, GL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACM, 1973, 20 (02) : 194 - 213
  • [10] Web-based guide to transportation benefit-cost analysis
    Sullivan, Edward
    Dahlgren, Joy
    Weisbrod, Glen
    Attaran, Kazem
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING-ASCE, 2008, 134 (07): : 282 - 286