Gulf war contamination assessment for optimal monitoring and remediation cost-benefit analysis, Kuwait

被引:9
|
作者
Yihdego, Yohannes [1 ]
Al-Weshah, Radwan A. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] SMEC, Sydney, NSW 2060, Australia
[2] Univ Jordan, Dept Civil Engn, Amman, Jordan
[3] Kuwait Environm Remediat Project, Kuwait, Kuwait
关键词
Visualization; Data analysis; Site investigation; Plume; Monitoring; Remediation; Hydrocarbon; Clean-up cost; Pollution; RAUDHATAIN;
D O I
10.1007/s12665-016-6025-3
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Site characterization was performed on an area of 580 km(2) around the strategically vital freshwater aquifers of the Al-Rawdhatain and Umm Al-Aish to assess the status of groundwater pollution as the result of Iraq invasion to Kuwait in 1991. Advanced data analysis and visualization software (EVS-Pro) was used for groundwater contamination assessment analytes: total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) and total dissolved solids (TDS). This will reduce the number of samples needed (saves time and money) and provide a superior assessment of the analytes distribution. Based on the "minimum-maximum plume technology'' analysis, the nominal plume area with a threshold of 0.031 mg/kg TPH is estimated at about 0.47 km 2. This is the difference between the maximum and minimum predicted plume sizes. EVS-Pro also computed 3.3775 x 10(9) and 4.0788 x 10(6) for the plume volumes and masses (dollars per volume and mass), respectively. Also, new sampling locations were determined for further detailed site assessments based on the confidence and uncertainty analysis, which is more defensible and cost-optimized approach. This will reduce the number of samples needed (saves time and money) and provide a superior assessment of the analytes distribution. These tools prove to be effective in assessing remediation costs of clean-up versus benefits obtained and in developing a cost-effective monitoring programme for insights into processes controlling subsurface contaminant transport that impact water quality.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] UNEMPLOYMENT AND COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
    BAXTER, ND
    HOWREY, EP
    PENNER, RG
    PUBLIC FINANCE, 1969, 24 (01): : 80 - 88
  • [42] Rethinking cost-benefit analysis
    Adler, MD
    Posner, EA
    YALE LAW JOURNAL, 1999, 109 (02): : 165 - +
  • [43] The discipline of cost-benefit analysis
    Sen, A
    JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES, 2000, 29 (02): : 931 - 952
  • [44] Is cost-benefit analysis for everyone?
    Sunstein, CR
    ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW, 2001, 53 (01) : 299 - 314
  • [45] Sustainability and cost-benefit analysis
    Pires, C
    ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A, 1998, 30 (12) : 2181 - 2194
  • [46] On justifying cost-benefit analysis
    Kornhauser, LA
    JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES, 2000, 29 (02): : 1037 - 1057
  • [47] THE RELATIONSHIP COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
    不详
    PSYCHOLOGIST, 2011, 24 (09) : 643 - 643
  • [48] Environmental Cost-Benefit Analysis
    Atkinson, Giles
    Mourato, Susana
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, 2008, 33 : 317 - 344
  • [49] Assessment of innovative transport concepts using cost-benefit analysis
    Melkert, Joris
    Van Wee, Bert
    TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 32 (06) : 545 - 571
  • [50] Improving assessment of transport policies by dynamic cost-benefit analysis
    Schade, W
    Rothengatter, W
    TRANSPORTATION FINANCE, ECONOMICS AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 2003: PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATION, 2003, (1839): : 107 - 114