Gulf war contamination assessment for optimal monitoring and remediation cost-benefit analysis, Kuwait

被引:9
|
作者
Yihdego, Yohannes [1 ]
Al-Weshah, Radwan A. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] SMEC, Sydney, NSW 2060, Australia
[2] Univ Jordan, Dept Civil Engn, Amman, Jordan
[3] Kuwait Environm Remediat Project, Kuwait, Kuwait
关键词
Visualization; Data analysis; Site investigation; Plume; Monitoring; Remediation; Hydrocarbon; Clean-up cost; Pollution; RAUDHATAIN;
D O I
10.1007/s12665-016-6025-3
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Site characterization was performed on an area of 580 km(2) around the strategically vital freshwater aquifers of the Al-Rawdhatain and Umm Al-Aish to assess the status of groundwater pollution as the result of Iraq invasion to Kuwait in 1991. Advanced data analysis and visualization software (EVS-Pro) was used for groundwater contamination assessment analytes: total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) and total dissolved solids (TDS). This will reduce the number of samples needed (saves time and money) and provide a superior assessment of the analytes distribution. Based on the "minimum-maximum plume technology'' analysis, the nominal plume area with a threshold of 0.031 mg/kg TPH is estimated at about 0.47 km 2. This is the difference between the maximum and minimum predicted plume sizes. EVS-Pro also computed 3.3775 x 10(9) and 4.0788 x 10(6) for the plume volumes and masses (dollars per volume and mass), respectively. Also, new sampling locations were determined for further detailed site assessments based on the confidence and uncertainty analysis, which is more defensible and cost-optimized approach. This will reduce the number of samples needed (saves time and money) and provide a superior assessment of the analytes distribution. These tools prove to be effective in assessing remediation costs of clean-up versus benefits obtained and in developing a cost-effective monitoring programme for insights into processes controlling subsurface contaminant transport that impact water quality.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cost-Benefit Analysis: Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring in Spinal Surgeries
    Ney, John P.
    van der Goes, David N.
    Watanabe, Jon H.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2013, 30 (03) : 280 - 286
  • [22] Friends or foes? Monetized Life Cycle Assessment and Cost-Benefit Analysis of the site remediation of a former gas plant
    Huysegoms, Lies
    Rousseau, Sandra
    Cappuyns, Valerie
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 619 : 258 - 271
  • [23] The Cost-Benefit Fallacy: Why Cost-Benefit Analysis Is Broken and How to Fix It
    Flyvbjerg, Bent
    Bester, Dirk W.
    JOURNAL OF BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS, 2021, 12 (03) : 395 - 419
  • [24] Cost-Benefit Analysis in Reasoning
    Alaoui, Larbi
    Penta, Antonio
    JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2022, : 881 - 925
  • [25] Beware the cost-benefit analysis
    Spence, Des
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 345
  • [26] Cost-benefit assessment of BLGCC technology
    Larson, Eric D.
    McDonald, George W.
    Yang, Wenrui
    Frederick, William James
    Iisa, Kristiina
    Kreutz, Thomas G.
    Malcolm, Earl W.
    Brown, Craig A.
    TAPPI Journal, 2000, 83 (06):
  • [27] Incommensurability and cost-benefit analysis
    Adler, M
    UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW REVIEW, 1998, 146 (05) : 1371 - 1418
  • [28] In Defence of Cost-Benefit Analysis
    Ergas, Henry
    AGENDA-A JOURNAL OF POLICY ANALYSIS AND REFORM, 2009, 16 (03) : 31 - 40
  • [29] Cost-benefit analysis: examples
    Linn, Mott
    BOTTOM LINE, 2011, 24 (01): : 68 - 72
  • [30] EQUITY IN COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
    PEARCE, DW
    WISE, J
    JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 1972, 6 (03) : 324 - 325