Using Akaike Information Criterion for Selecting the Field Distribution in a Reverberation Chamber

被引:24
|
作者
Chen, Xiaoming [1 ]
机构
[1] Chalmers Univ Technol, Dept Signals & Syst, SE-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
Akaike's information criterion (AIC); field distribution; goodness-of-fit (GOF); reverberation chamber (RC); STATISTICAL-MODEL; CHANNEL; PARAMETERS; REGRESSION; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1109/TEMC.2012.2225107
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Previous studies on modeling the random field (amplitude) in a reverberation chamber (RC) were conducted either by fitting a given distribution to measured data or by comparing different distributions using goodness-of-fit (GOF) tests. However, the GOF tests are inappropriate for comparing different distribution candidates in that they are meant to check if a given distribution provides an adequate fit for a set of data or not and they cannot provide correct relative fitness between different candidate distributions in general. A fair comparison of different distributions in modeling the RC field is missing in the literature. In this paper, Akaike's information criterion (AIC), which allows fair comparisons of different distributions, is introduced. With Rayleigh, Rician, Nakagami, Bessel K, and Weibull distributions as the candidate set, the AIC approach is applied to measured data in an RC. Results show that the Weibull distribution provides the best fit to the field in an undermoded RC and that the Rayleigh distribution provides the best approximation of the field in an over-moded RC. In addition, it is found that both the Rician and Weibull distributions provide improved approximations of the field in an RC loaded with lossy objects. This study provides correct complementary results to the previous RC studies.
引用
收藏
页码:664 / 670
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparing time activity curves using the Akaike information criterion
    Kletting, Peter
    Kull, Thomas
    Reske, Sven N.
    Glatting, Gerhard
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2009, 54 (21): : N501 - N507
  • [22] Design of ensemble neural network using the Akaike information criterion
    Zhao, Zhiye
    Zhang, Yun
    Liao, Hongjian
    ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2008, 21 (08) : 1182 - 1188
  • [23] MODEL SELECTION FOR INVESTIGATION OF THE FIELD DISTRIBUTION IN A REVERBERATION CHAMBER
    Chen, Xiaoming
    PROGRESS IN ELECTROMAGNETICS RESEARCH M, 2013, 28 : 169 - 183
  • [24] Chaotic characteristics and statistic distribution of field in reverberation chamber
    Tan, Wuduan
    Yu, Zhiyong
    Song, Jianshe
    Shao, Zehua
    Qiangjiguang Yu Lizishu/High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2013, 25 (04): : 940 - 944
  • [25] Semiparametric and additive model selection using an improved Akaike information criterion
    Simonoff, JS
    Tsai, CL
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND GRAPHICAL STATISTICS, 1999, 8 (01) : 22 - 40
  • [26] Practical advice on variable selection and reporting using Akaike information criterion
    Sutherland, Chris
    Hare, Darragh
    Johnson, Paul J.
    Linden, Daniel W.
    Montgomery, Robert A.
    Droge, Egil
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2023, 290 (2007)
  • [27] Ground penetrating radar data processing using Akaike information criterion
    Jendo, Jacek
    2017 RADIOELECTRONIC SYSTEMS CONFERENCE, 2018, 10715
  • [28] Uninformative Parameters and Model Selection Using Akaike's Information Criterion
    Arnold, Todd W.
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2010, 74 (06): : 1175 - 1178
  • [29] HELLINGER DISTANCE AND AKAIKE INFORMATION CRITERION FOR THE HISTOGRAM
    KANAZAWA, Y
    STATISTICS & PROBABILITY LETTERS, 1993, 17 (04) : 293 - 298
  • [30] Piecewise Regression through the Akaike Information Criterion using Mathematical Programming
    Gkioulekas, Ioannis
    Papageorgiou, Lazaros G.
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2018, 51 (15): : 730 - 735