A 3D numerical model for the optimization of running tracks performance

被引:5
|
作者
Andena, L. [1 ,3 ]
Aleo, S. [1 ]
Caimmi, F. [1 ]
Mariani, S. [2 ,3 ]
Briatico-Vangosa, F. [1 ]
Pavan, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Milan, Dipartimento Chim Mat & Ingn Chim, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[2] Politecn Milan, Dipartimento Ingn Civile & Ambientale, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[3] Politecn Milan, Engn Sport Lab E4Sport, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, I-20133 Milan, Italy
来源
ENGINEERING OF SPORT 11 | 2016年 / 147卷
关键词
athletics tracks; modeling; mechanical properties; geometry optimization; FORCE REDUCTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.291
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In previous works, a finite element model of the shock absorbing characteristics of athletics tracks was developed, able to give sufficiently reliable predictions from laboratory tests performed on suitable material samples. The model proved to be effective in discriminating the effects of geometry (i.e. thickness) and material properties (essentially the elastic characteristics) on force reduction, thus allowing a first optimization of the tracks in view of their approval by the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF). This simplified 2D model neglected the real track structure, considering it as a single layer of material having homogenized properties. In the present study, a new 3D model was developed to accurately describe the structure of multi-layered tracks, with properties and geometrical construction (e.g. solid or honeycomb) differing from one layer to another. Several tracks having different combinations of top/bottom layers varying in both material formulation (i.e. chemical composition) and geometry were thus considered. Mechanical properties of the individual elements constituting the track were measured with small-scale laboratory tests, taking into account their strain-rate dependence. The 3D model allowed a complete representation of the loads acting on the track and it gave results which are in very good agreement with the experiments. This proves it to be a valuable tool for the purpose of optimizing the track in terms of material formulation as well as layer geometrical construction and arrangement: as an example, the effect of changing the cell size of the honeycomb pattern was investigated. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:854 / 859
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The unified sand model and 3D numerical implementation
    Wang Z.-J.
    Zhao B.-M.
    Gongcheng Lixue/Engineering Mechanics, 2021, 38 (10): : 181 - 187and247
  • [22] 3D numerical model for Pearl River estuary
    Chau, KW
    Jiang, YW
    JOURNAL OF HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING-ASCE, 2001, 127 (01): : 72 - 82
  • [23] The independent validation of SSIIM, a 3D numerical model
    Bowles, CB
    Daffern, C
    Ashforth-Frost, S
    HYDROINFORMATICS '98, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1998, : 1291 - 1298
  • [24] 3D numerical model for Pearl River estuary
    Chau, K.W.
    Jiang, Y.W.
    2001, ASCE, Reston, VA, United States (127)
  • [25] A 3D numerical model of an ONAN distribution transformer
    Cordoba, Paola A.
    Dadi, Enzo
    Silin, Nicolas
    APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 148 : 897 - 906
  • [26] 3D Numerical Model for Pearl River Estuary
    Chau, K.W.
    Jiang, Y.W.
    Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2001, 127 (01) : 72 - 82
  • [27] 3D numerical model of ecohydrodynamics for shallow waters
    Bezhenar, Roman
    Jung, Kyung Tae
    Maderich, Vladimir
    Kim, Kyeong Ok
    JOURNAL OF COASTAL RESEARCH, 2016, : 820 - 824
  • [28] 3D Numerical Model for Piled Raft Foundation
    Sinha, Anup
    Hanna, A. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMECHANICS, 2017, 17 (02)
  • [29] Numerical methods for constrained optimization in 2D and 3D biomechanics
    Nedoma, J
    Bartos, M
    Kestránek, Z
    Kestranek, Z
    Stehlík, J
    NUMERICAL LINEAR ALGEBRA WITH APPLICATIONS, 1999, 6 (07) : 557 - 586
  • [30] A reduced-order lie group-based race car model for systematic trajectory optimization on 3D tracks
    Bartali, Lorenzo
    Gabiccini, Marco
    Grabovic, Eugeniu
    Domenighini, Marcello
    Guiggiani, Massimo
    MECCANICA, 2023, 58 (10) : 1869 - 1883