Favorable intermediate risk prostate cancer with biopsy Gleason score of 6

被引:2
|
作者
Oh, Jong Jin [1 ,2 ]
Ahn, Hyungwoo [3 ]
Hwang, Sung Il [3 ]
Lee, Hak Jong [3 ,4 ]
Choe, Gheeyoung [5 ]
Lee, Sangchul [1 ]
Lee, Hakmin [1 ]
Byun, Seok-Soo [1 ,2 ]
Hong, Sung Kyu [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Dept Urol, Seongnam, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Urol, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Dept Radiol, Seongnam, South Korea
[4] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Dept Pathol, Seongnam, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Prostate cancer; Intermediate risk group; MRI;
D O I
10.1186/s12894-021-00827-2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background To identify potential prognostic factors among patients with favorable intermediate risk prostate cancer with a biopsy Gleason score 6. Methods From 2003 to 2019, favorable intermediate risk patients who underwent radical prostatectomy were included in this study. All patients were evaluated preoperatively with MRI. Using PI-RADS scores, patients were divided into two groups, and clinic-pathological outcomes were compared. The impact of preoperative factors on significant pathologic Gleason score upgrading (>= 4 + 3) and biochemical recurrence were assessed via multivariate analysis. Subgroup analysis was performed in patients with PI-RADS <= 2. Results Among the 239 patients, 116 (48.5%) were MRI-negative (PI-RADS <= 3) and 123 (51.5%) were MRI-positive (PI-RADS > 3). Six patients in the MRI-negative group (5.2%) were characterized as requiring significant pathologic Gleason score upgrading compared with 34 patients (27.6%) in the MRI-positive group (p < 0.001). PI-RADS score was shown to be a significant predictor of significant pathologic Gleason score upgrading (OR = 6.246, p < 0.001) and biochemical recurrence (HR = 2.595, p = 0.043). 10-years biochemical recurrence-free survival was estimated to be 84.4% and 72.6% in the MRI-negative and MRI-positive groups (p = 0.035). In the 79 patients with PI-RADS <= 2, tumor length in biopsy cores was identified as a significant predictor of pathologic Gleason score (OR = 11.336, p = 0.014). Conclusions Among the patients with favorable intermediate risk prostate cancer with a biopsy Gleason score 6, preoperative MRI was capable of predicting significant pathologic Gleason score upgrading and biochemical recurrence. Especially, the patients with PI-RADS <= 2 and low biopsy tumor length could be a potential candidate to active surveillance.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] PROSTATE CANCER Is prostatectomy for Gleason score 6 a treatment failure?
    van der Kwast, Theodorus H.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    NATURE REVIEWS UROLOGY, 2015, 12 (01) : 10 - U135
  • [32] Prostate cancer grading: the effect of stratification of needle biopsy Gleason Score 4+3 as high or intermediate grade
    Fanning, Deirdre M.
    Kay, Elaine
    Fan, Yue
    Fitzpatrick, John M.
    Watson, R. William G.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 105 (05) : 631 - 635
  • [33] One core gleason score 6 prostate cancer: Clinically insignificant prostate cancer?
    Schafer, Georg
    Horninger, Wolfgang
    Pelzer, Alexandre E.
    Brunner, Andrea
    Mikuz, Gregor
    Bektic, Jasmin
    Bartsch, Georg
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (04): : 718 - 719
  • [34] Biopsy undergrading in men with Gleason score6 and fatal prostate cancer in the European Randomized study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Rotterdam
    Alberts, Arnout R.
    Bokhorst, Leonard P.
    Kweldam, Charlotte F.
    Schoots, Ivo G.
    van der Kwast, Theo H.
    van Leenders, Geert J.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 24 (04) : 281 - 286
  • [35] Risk stratification of Prostate cancer: How accurate is the Gleason Score?
    Heide, J.
    Siegmann, A.
    Droeber, J.
    Hinkelbein, W.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2011, 187 : 41 - 41
  • [36] The Quantitative Gleason Score Improves Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment
    Reese, Adam C.
    Cowan, Janet E.
    Brajtbord, Jonathan S.
    Harris, Catherine R.
    Carroll, Peter R.
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    CANCER, 2012, 118 (24) : 6046 - 6054
  • [37] Detecting lower in addition to the highest Gleason score prostate cancer on core biopsy and the risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality.
    Aizer, Ayal A.
    Phillips, John
    Chen, Ming-Hui
    Zhang, Danjie
    Loffredo, Marian
    D'Amico, Anthony Victor
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 31 (15)
  • [38] CHANGE IN SERIAL BIOPSY GLEASON SCORE IN MEN WITH PROSTATE CANCER ON ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE
    Greene, Kirsten L.
    Cowan, Janet E.
    Carroll, Peter R.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (04): : 177 - 177
  • [39] Is Gleason score in transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy consistent with Gleason score in radical prostatectomy?
    Karabicak, Mustafa
    Turk, Hakan
    Ergani, Batuhan
    Kozacioglu, Zafer
    Koc, Gokhan
    Ilbey, Yusuf Ozlem
    KUWAIT MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 53 (02): : 145 - 149
  • [40] Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Helps to Predict Upgrading in Biopsy-Proven Prostate Cancer With a Gleason Score of 6
    Wu, Chen-Jiang
    Zhang, Yu-Dong
    Bao, Mei-Ling
    Li, Hai
    Wang, Xiao-Ning
    Liu, Xi-Sheng
    Shi, Hai-Bin
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2017, 209 (05) : 1081 - 1087