Favorable intermediate risk prostate cancer with biopsy Gleason score of 6

被引:2
|
作者
Oh, Jong Jin [1 ,2 ]
Ahn, Hyungwoo [3 ]
Hwang, Sung Il [3 ]
Lee, Hak Jong [3 ,4 ]
Choe, Gheeyoung [5 ]
Lee, Sangchul [1 ]
Lee, Hakmin [1 ]
Byun, Seok-Soo [1 ,2 ]
Hong, Sung Kyu [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Dept Urol, Seongnam, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Urol, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Dept Radiol, Seongnam, South Korea
[4] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Dept Pathol, Seongnam, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Prostate cancer; Intermediate risk group; MRI;
D O I
10.1186/s12894-021-00827-2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background To identify potential prognostic factors among patients with favorable intermediate risk prostate cancer with a biopsy Gleason score 6. Methods From 2003 to 2019, favorable intermediate risk patients who underwent radical prostatectomy were included in this study. All patients were evaluated preoperatively with MRI. Using PI-RADS scores, patients were divided into two groups, and clinic-pathological outcomes were compared. The impact of preoperative factors on significant pathologic Gleason score upgrading (>= 4 + 3) and biochemical recurrence were assessed via multivariate analysis. Subgroup analysis was performed in patients with PI-RADS <= 2. Results Among the 239 patients, 116 (48.5%) were MRI-negative (PI-RADS <= 3) and 123 (51.5%) were MRI-positive (PI-RADS > 3). Six patients in the MRI-negative group (5.2%) were characterized as requiring significant pathologic Gleason score upgrading compared with 34 patients (27.6%) in the MRI-positive group (p < 0.001). PI-RADS score was shown to be a significant predictor of significant pathologic Gleason score upgrading (OR = 6.246, p < 0.001) and biochemical recurrence (HR = 2.595, p = 0.043). 10-years biochemical recurrence-free survival was estimated to be 84.4% and 72.6% in the MRI-negative and MRI-positive groups (p = 0.035). In the 79 patients with PI-RADS <= 2, tumor length in biopsy cores was identified as a significant predictor of pathologic Gleason score (OR = 11.336, p = 0.014). Conclusions Among the patients with favorable intermediate risk prostate cancer with a biopsy Gleason score 6, preoperative MRI was capable of predicting significant pathologic Gleason score upgrading and biochemical recurrence. Especially, the patients with PI-RADS <= 2 and low biopsy tumor length could be a potential candidate to active surveillance.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Risk of disparity between needle biopsy Gleason score and final pathologic Gleason score is not correlated with prostate volume
    McCann, TR
    Wosnitzer, MS
    McKiernan, JM
    Benson, MC
    Olsson, CA
    Goluboff, ET
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 175 (04): : 481 - 481
  • [22] Targeted Prostate Biopsy Gleason Score Heterogeneity and Implications for Risk Stratification
    Mesko, Shane
    Marks, Leonard
    Ragab, Omar
    Patel, Shyamal
    Margolis, Daniel A.
    Demanes, D. Jeffrey
    Kamrava, Mitchell
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2018, 41 (05): : 497 - 501
  • [23] Predicting the risk of patients with biopsy gleason score 6 to Harbor a higher grade cancer
    Gofrit, Ofer N.
    Zorn, Kevin C.
    Taxy, Jerome B.
    Lin, Shang
    Zagaja, Gregory P.
    Steinberg, Gary D.
    Shalhav, Arieh L.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 178 (05): : 1925 - 1928
  • [24] Limitations of biopsy Gleason grade: Implications for counseling patients with biopsy Gleason 6 prostate cancer
    Sved, PD
    Manoharan, M
    Gomez, P
    Kim, S
    Soloway, MS
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (04): : 281 - 281
  • [25] Does prostate biopsy Gleason score accurately express the biologic features of prostate cancer?
    Stav, Kobi
    Judith, Sandbank
    Merald, Herbert
    Leibovici, Dan
    Lindner, Arie
    Zisman, Amnon
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2007, 25 (05) : 383 - 386
  • [26] THE WEIGHTED GLEASON SCORE OF PROSTATE BIOPSY SPECIMENS IMPROVES THE PREDICTION OF PATHOLOGIC GLEASON SCORE
    Cho, Eric
    Kaplan, Joshua
    Harbin, Andrew
    Kamenko, Anastasiya
    Ramsey, Frederick
    Mydlo, Jack
    Eun, Daniel
    Reese, Adam
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (04): : E244 - E244
  • [27] Prostate cancer outcomes of men with biopsy gleason score 6 and 7 without cribriform or intraductal carcinoma
    Kweldam, C.
    Kummerlin, I.
    Nieboer, D.
    Verhoef, E.
    Steyerberg, E.
    Incrocci, L.
    Bangma, C.
    van der Kwast, T.
    Roobol, M.
    van Leenders, G.
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2016, 469 : S221 - S221
  • [28] Prostate cancer outcomes of men with biopsy Gleason score 6 and 7 without cribriform or intraductal carcinoma
    Kweldam, Charlotte F.
    Kummerlin, Intan P.
    Nieboer, Daan
    Verhoef, Esther I.
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    Incrocci, Luca
    Bangma, Chris H.
    van der Kwast, Theodorus H.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    van Leenders, Geert J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2016, 66 : 26 - 33
  • [29] INDEPENDENT RISK FACTORS FOR GLEASON SCORE DOWNGRADING IN PATIENTS WITH EXTENDED PROSTATE BIOPSY
    Waldert, M.
    Klatte, T.
    Remzi, M.
    Marberger, M.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2010, 9 (02) : 196 - 196
  • [30] Gleason Score 6-Prostate Cancer or Benign Variant?
    Knuechel, Ruth
    ONCOLOGY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2015, 38 (12) : 629 - 632