Favorable intermediate risk prostate cancer with biopsy Gleason score of 6

被引:2
|
作者
Oh, Jong Jin [1 ,2 ]
Ahn, Hyungwoo [3 ]
Hwang, Sung Il [3 ]
Lee, Hak Jong [3 ,4 ]
Choe, Gheeyoung [5 ]
Lee, Sangchul [1 ]
Lee, Hakmin [1 ]
Byun, Seok-Soo [1 ,2 ]
Hong, Sung Kyu [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Dept Urol, Seongnam, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Urol, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Dept Radiol, Seongnam, South Korea
[4] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Dept Pathol, Seongnam, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Prostate cancer; Intermediate risk group; MRI;
D O I
10.1186/s12894-021-00827-2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background To identify potential prognostic factors among patients with favorable intermediate risk prostate cancer with a biopsy Gleason score 6. Methods From 2003 to 2019, favorable intermediate risk patients who underwent radical prostatectomy were included in this study. All patients were evaluated preoperatively with MRI. Using PI-RADS scores, patients were divided into two groups, and clinic-pathological outcomes were compared. The impact of preoperative factors on significant pathologic Gleason score upgrading (>= 4 + 3) and biochemical recurrence were assessed via multivariate analysis. Subgroup analysis was performed in patients with PI-RADS <= 2. Results Among the 239 patients, 116 (48.5%) were MRI-negative (PI-RADS <= 3) and 123 (51.5%) were MRI-positive (PI-RADS > 3). Six patients in the MRI-negative group (5.2%) were characterized as requiring significant pathologic Gleason score upgrading compared with 34 patients (27.6%) in the MRI-positive group (p < 0.001). PI-RADS score was shown to be a significant predictor of significant pathologic Gleason score upgrading (OR = 6.246, p < 0.001) and biochemical recurrence (HR = 2.595, p = 0.043). 10-years biochemical recurrence-free survival was estimated to be 84.4% and 72.6% in the MRI-negative and MRI-positive groups (p = 0.035). In the 79 patients with PI-RADS <= 2, tumor length in biopsy cores was identified as a significant predictor of pathologic Gleason score (OR = 11.336, p = 0.014). Conclusions Among the patients with favorable intermediate risk prostate cancer with a biopsy Gleason score 6, preoperative MRI was capable of predicting significant pathologic Gleason score upgrading and biochemical recurrence. Especially, the patients with PI-RADS <= 2 and low biopsy tumor length could be a potential candidate to active surveillance.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Favorable intermediate risk prostate cancer with biopsy Gleason score of 6
    Jong Jin Oh
    Hyungwoo Ahn
    Sung Il Hwang
    Hak Jong Lee
    Gheeyoung Choe
    Sangchul Lee
    Hakmin Lee
    Seok-Soo Byun
    Sung Kyu Hong
    BMC Urology, 21
  • [2] Redefining intermediate risk prostate cancer using Gleason score
    Pollard, M.
    Lavery, H. J.
    Hobbs, A. R.
    Hall, S.
    Levinson, A. W.
    Samadi, D. B.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2012, 11 (01) : E766 - U626
  • [3] Limitations of biopsy Gleason grade: Implications for counseling patients with biopsy Gleason score 6 prostate cancer
    Sved, PD
    Gomez, P
    Manoharan, M
    Kim, SS
    Soloway, MS
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 172 (01): : 98 - 102
  • [4] Influence of Active Surveillance on Gleason Score Upgrade and Prognosis in Low- and Favorable Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer
    Hu, Xuanhan
    Miao, Jia
    Huang, Jiaqing
    Qian, Lin
    Zhang, Dahong
    Wei, Haibin
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2022, 29 (10) : 7964 - 7978
  • [5] Comparison of Pathological and Oncologic Outcomes of Favorable Risk Gleason Score 3+4 and Low Risk Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer: Considerations for Active Surveillance
    Gearman, Derek J.
    Morlacco, Alessandro
    Cheville, John C.
    Rangel, Laureano J.
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (05): : 1188 - 1195
  • [6] Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer improves Gleason score assessment in favorable risk prostate cancer
    Kamrava, Mitchell
    Kishan, Amar U.
    Margolis, Daniel J.
    Huang, Jiaoti
    Dorey, Fred
    Lieu, Patricia
    Kupelian, Patrick A.
    Marks, Leonard S.
    PRACTICAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2015, 5 (06) : 411 - 416
  • [7] Re: Comparison of Pathological and Oncologic Outcomes of Favorable Risk Gleason Score 3+4 and Low Risk Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer: Considerations for Active Surveillance
    Iczkowski, Kenneth A.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 200 (04): : 905 - 905
  • [8] Patient risk stratification using Gleason score concordance and upgrading among men with prostate biopsy Gleason score 6 or 7
    Serkin, Faye B.
    Soderdahl, Douglas W.
    Cullen, Jennifer
    Chen, Yongmei
    Hernandez, Javier
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2010, 28 (03) : 302 - 307
  • [9] Advancing age and the risk of adverse pathology at radical prostatectomy in men with biopsy Gleason score 6 prostate cancer
    Kim, Daniel
    Chen, Ming-Hui
    Huland, Hartwig
    Graefen, Markus
    Tilki, Derya
    D'Amico, Anthony Victor
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 38 (06)
  • [10] Influence of Biopsy Gleason Score on the Risk of Lymph Node Invasion in Patients With Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy
    Wenzel, Mike
    Preisser, Felix
    Hoeh, Benedikt
    Welte, Maria N.
    Humke, Clara
    Wittler, Clarissa
    Wuernschimmel, Christoph
    Becker, Andreas
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    Chun, Felix K. H.
    Mandel, Philipp
    Kluth, Luis A.
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2021, 8