Interpregnancy Interval and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes An Analysis of Successive Pregnancies

被引:149
|
作者
Hanley, Gillian E.
Hutcheon, Jennifer A.
Kinniburgh, Brooke A.
Lee, Lily
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Perinatal Serv BC, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Vancouver, BC, Canada
来源
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY | 2017年 / 129卷 / 03期
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
PERINATAL OUTCOMES; BIRTH-WEIGHT; RISK; INFANT; HEALTH; STILLBIRTH;
D O I
10.1097/AOG.0000000000001891
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between inter-pregnancy interval and maternal-neonate health when matching women to their successive pregnancies to control for differences in maternal risk factors and compare these results with traditional unmatched designs. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 38,178 women with three or more deliveries (two or greater interpregnancy intervals) between 2000 and 2015 in British Columbia, Canada. We examined interpregnancy interval (0-5, 6-11, 12-17, 18-23 [reference], 24-59, and 60 months or greater) in relation to neonatal outcomes (preterm birth [less than 37 weeks of gestation], small-for-gestational-age birth [less than the 10th centile], use of neonatal intensive care, low birth weight [less than 2,500 g]) and maternal outcomes (gestational diabetes, beginning the subsequent pregnancy obese [body mass index 30 or greater], and preeclampsia-eclampsia). We used conditional logistic regression to compare interpregnancy intervals within the same mother and unconditional (unmatched) logistic regression to enable comparison with prior research. RESULTS: Analyses using the traditional unmatched design showed significantly increased risks associated with short interpregnancy intervals (eg, there were 232 preterm births [12.8%] in 0-5 months compared with 501 [8.2%] in the 18-23 months reference group; adjusted odds ratio [OR] for preterm birth 1.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.35-1.73). However, these risks were eliminated in within-woman matched analyses (adjusted OR for preterm birth 0.85, 95% CI 0.71-1.02). Matched results indicated that short interpregnancy intervals were significantly associated with increased risk of gestational diabetes (adjusted OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.02-1.80 for 0-5 months) and beginning the subsequent pregnancy obese (adjusted OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.05-2.45 for 0-5 months and adjusted OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.10-1.87 for 6-11 months). CONCLUSION: Previously reported associations between short interpregnancy intervals and adverse neonatal outcomes may not be causal. However, short interpregnancy interval is associated with increased risk of gestational diabetes and beginning a subsequent pregnancy obese.
引用
收藏
页码:408 / 415
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Interpregnancy interval and subsequent pregnancy outcomes after dilation and evacuation
    Kuwahara, Melissa
    Yamasato, Kelly
    Tschann, Mary
    Kaneshiro, Bliss
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2018, 38 (04) : 516 - 520
  • [32] Association of interpregnancy interval with adverse pregnancy outcomes according to the outcomes of the preceding pregnancy: a longitudinal study with 4.7 million live births from Brazil
    Tedde, Joao Guilherme G.
    Cerqueira-Silva, Thiago
    Garcia, Sidney A. Lagrosa
    Amira, Brenda V.
    Rodrigues, Laura C.
    Barreto, Mauricio L.
    Rocha, Aline S.
    Ribeiro-Silva, Rita de Cassia
    Falcao, Ila R.
    Paixao, Enny S.
    LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH-AMERICAS, 2024, 30
  • [33] Effects of interpregnancy interval and outcome of the preceding pregnancy on pregnancy outcomes in Matlab, Bangladesh
    DaVanzo, J.
    Hale, L.
    Razzaque, A.
    Rahmand, M.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2007, 114 (09) : 1079 - 1087
  • [34] Interpregnancy weight change and adverse pregnancy outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Oteng-Ntim, E.
    Mononen, S.
    Sawicki, O.
    Seed, P.
    Bick, D.
    Poston, L.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2018, 125 : 88 - 88
  • [35] Interpregnancy weight change and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Oteng-Ntim, Eugene
    Mononen, Sofia
    Sawicki, Olga
    Seed, Paul T.
    Bick, Debra
    Poston, Lucilla
    BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (06):
  • [36] Long interpregnancy interval and adverse perinatal outcomes: A retrospective cohort study
    Lin, Jing
    Liu, Han
    Wu, Dan-Dan
    Hu, Hong-Tao
    Wang, Hui-Hui
    Zhou, Cheng-Liang
    Liu, Xin-Mei
    Chen, Xiao-Jun
    Sheng, Jian-Zhong
    Huang, He-Feng
    SCIENCE CHINA-LIFE SCIENCES, 2020, 63 (06) : 898 - 904
  • [37] Long interpregnancy interval and adverse perinatal outcomes: a retrospective cohort study
    Jing Lin
    Han Liu
    DanDan Wu
    HongTao Hu
    HuiHui Wang
    ChengLiang Zhou
    XinMei Liu
    XiaoJun Chen
    JianZhong Sheng
    HeFeng Huang
    Science China(Life Sciences), 2020, 63 (06) : 898 - 904
  • [38] Long interpregnancy interval and adverse perinatal outcomes: A retrospective cohort study
    Jing Lin
    Han Liu
    Dan-Dan Wu
    Hong-Tao Hu
    Hui-Hui Wang
    Cheng-Liang Zhou
    Xin-Mei Liu
    Xiao-Jun Chen
    Jian-Zhong Sheng
    He-Feng Huang
    Science China Life Sciences, 2020, 63 : 898 - 904
  • [39] Long interpregnancy interval and adverse perinatal outcomes: a retrospective cohort study
    Jing Lin
    Han Liu
    Dan-Dan Wu
    Hong-Tao Hu
    Hui-Hui Wang
    Cheng-Liang Zhou
    Xin-Mei Liu
    Xiao-Jun Chen
    Jian-Zhong Sheng
    He-Feng Huang
    Science China Life Sciences, 2020, (06) : 898 - 904
  • [40] Effect of interpregnancy interval on adverse pregnancy outcomes in northern Tanzania: a registry-based retrospective cohort study
    Mahande, Michael J.
    Obure, Joseph
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2016, 16