Interpregnancy Interval and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes An Analysis of Successive Pregnancies

被引:149
|
作者
Hanley, Gillian E.
Hutcheon, Jennifer A.
Kinniburgh, Brooke A.
Lee, Lily
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Perinatal Serv BC, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Vancouver, BC, Canada
来源
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY | 2017年 / 129卷 / 03期
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
PERINATAL OUTCOMES; BIRTH-WEIGHT; RISK; INFANT; HEALTH; STILLBIRTH;
D O I
10.1097/AOG.0000000000001891
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between inter-pregnancy interval and maternal-neonate health when matching women to their successive pregnancies to control for differences in maternal risk factors and compare these results with traditional unmatched designs. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 38,178 women with three or more deliveries (two or greater interpregnancy intervals) between 2000 and 2015 in British Columbia, Canada. We examined interpregnancy interval (0-5, 6-11, 12-17, 18-23 [reference], 24-59, and 60 months or greater) in relation to neonatal outcomes (preterm birth [less than 37 weeks of gestation], small-for-gestational-age birth [less than the 10th centile], use of neonatal intensive care, low birth weight [less than 2,500 g]) and maternal outcomes (gestational diabetes, beginning the subsequent pregnancy obese [body mass index 30 or greater], and preeclampsia-eclampsia). We used conditional logistic regression to compare interpregnancy intervals within the same mother and unconditional (unmatched) logistic regression to enable comparison with prior research. RESULTS: Analyses using the traditional unmatched design showed significantly increased risks associated with short interpregnancy intervals (eg, there were 232 preterm births [12.8%] in 0-5 months compared with 501 [8.2%] in the 18-23 months reference group; adjusted odds ratio [OR] for preterm birth 1.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.35-1.73). However, these risks were eliminated in within-woman matched analyses (adjusted OR for preterm birth 0.85, 95% CI 0.71-1.02). Matched results indicated that short interpregnancy intervals were significantly associated with increased risk of gestational diabetes (adjusted OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.02-1.80 for 0-5 months) and beginning the subsequent pregnancy obese (adjusted OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.05-2.45 for 0-5 months and adjusted OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.10-1.87 for 6-11 months). CONCLUSION: Previously reported associations between short interpregnancy intervals and adverse neonatal outcomes may not be causal. However, short interpregnancy interval is associated with increased risk of gestational diabetes and beginning a subsequent pregnancy obese.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:408 / 415
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Interpregnancy Interval and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome-Analysis on US Birth Data.
    Graf, Vanessa
    Haleem, Khadija
    McClelland, W. Spencer
    Cheon, Teresa
    Benedetto, M. Teresa
    Anzai, Yuzuru
    REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2020, 27 (SUPPL 1) : 204A - 204A
  • [22] The influence of birth outcomes and pregnancy complications on interpregnancy interval: a quantile regression analysis
    Gebremedhin, Amanuel T.
    Regan, Annette K.
    Haberg, Siri E.
    Marinovich, M. Luke
    Tessema, Gizachew A.
    Pereira, Gavin
    ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2023, 85 : 108 - +
  • [23] Relationship Between Interpregnancy Interval and Adverse Perinatal Outcomes.
    Yee, Lynn M.
    Truong, Yen N.
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    Cheng, Yvonne W.
    REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2015, 22 : 352A - 353A
  • [24] Effect of interpregnancy interval on adverse perinatal outcomes - Is there a racial difference?
    Zhu, BP
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2000, 151 (11) : S9 - S9
  • [25] Effect of interpregnancy interval on adverse perinatal outcomes - a national study
    Grisaru-Granovsky, Sorina
    Gordon, Ethel-Sherry
    Haklai, Ziona
    Samueloff, Amon
    Schimmel, Michael M.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2009, 80 (06) : 512 - 518
  • [26] In vitro fertilization, interpregnancy interval, and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes
    Palmsten, Kristin
    Homer, Michael V.
    Zhang, Yujia
    Crawford, Sara
    Kirby, Russell S.
    Copeland, Glenn
    Chambers, Christina D.
    Kissin, Dmitry M.
    Su, H. Irene
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2018, 109 (05) : 840 - +
  • [27] Impact of interpregnancy interval on the subsequent risk of adverse perinatal outcomes
    Ekin, Atalay
    Gezer, Cenk
    Taner, Cuneyt Eftal
    Ozeren, Mehmet
    Mat, Emre
    Solmaz, Ulas
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2015, 41 (11) : 1744 - 1751
  • [28] Effect of interpregnancy interval on outcomes of pregnancy after recurrent pregnancy loss
    Bentolila, Yaara
    Ratzon, Ronit
    Shoham-Vardi, Ilana
    Serjienko, Ruslan
    Mazor, Moshe
    Bashiri, Asher
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2013, 26 (14): : 1459 - 1464
  • [29] Effect of interpregnancy interval after a first pregnancy complicated by placental abruption, on adverse maternal and fetal outcomes in a second pregnancy
    Rohde, Rebecca L.
    Luong, Lan
    Adjei Boakye, Eric
    Chang, Jen Jen
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2020, 33 (22): : 3809 - 3815
  • [30] The effect of short interpregnancy interval on adverse pregnancy outcomes for older mothers: a population-based cohort
    Schummers, L.
    Hutcheon, J.
    Hernandez-Diaz, S.
    Williams, P.
    Hacker, M.
    VanderWeele, T.
    Norman, W.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2018, 98 (04) : 361 - 361