Interpregnancy Interval and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes An Analysis of Successive Pregnancies

被引:151
|
作者
Hanley, Gillian E.
Hutcheon, Jennifer A.
Kinniburgh, Brooke A.
Lee, Lily
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Perinatal Serv BC, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Vancouver, BC, Canada
来源
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY | 2017年 / 129卷 / 03期
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
PERINATAL OUTCOMES; BIRTH-WEIGHT; RISK; INFANT; HEALTH; STILLBIRTH;
D O I
10.1097/AOG.0000000000001891
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between inter-pregnancy interval and maternal-neonate health when matching women to their successive pregnancies to control for differences in maternal risk factors and compare these results with traditional unmatched designs. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 38,178 women with three or more deliveries (two or greater interpregnancy intervals) between 2000 and 2015 in British Columbia, Canada. We examined interpregnancy interval (0-5, 6-11, 12-17, 18-23 [reference], 24-59, and 60 months or greater) in relation to neonatal outcomes (preterm birth [less than 37 weeks of gestation], small-for-gestational-age birth [less than the 10th centile], use of neonatal intensive care, low birth weight [less than 2,500 g]) and maternal outcomes (gestational diabetes, beginning the subsequent pregnancy obese [body mass index 30 or greater], and preeclampsia-eclampsia). We used conditional logistic regression to compare interpregnancy intervals within the same mother and unconditional (unmatched) logistic regression to enable comparison with prior research. RESULTS: Analyses using the traditional unmatched design showed significantly increased risks associated with short interpregnancy intervals (eg, there were 232 preterm births [12.8%] in 0-5 months compared with 501 [8.2%] in the 18-23 months reference group; adjusted odds ratio [OR] for preterm birth 1.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.35-1.73). However, these risks were eliminated in within-woman matched analyses (adjusted OR for preterm birth 0.85, 95% CI 0.71-1.02). Matched results indicated that short interpregnancy intervals were significantly associated with increased risk of gestational diabetes (adjusted OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.02-1.80 for 0-5 months) and beginning the subsequent pregnancy obese (adjusted OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.05-2.45 for 0-5 months and adjusted OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.10-1.87 for 6-11 months). CONCLUSION: Previously reported associations between short interpregnancy intervals and adverse neonatal outcomes may not be causal. However, short interpregnancy interval is associated with increased risk of gestational diabetes and beginning a subsequent pregnancy obese.
引用
收藏
页码:408 / 415
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Interpregnancy Interval and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: An Analysis of Successive Pregnancies
    Roberts, Christine L.
    Algert, Charles S.
    Nippita, Tanya A.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 130 (02): : 464 - 465
  • [2] Interpregnancy Interval and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: An Analysis of Successive Pregnancies and Interpregnancy Interval and Pregnancy Outcomes: Causal or Not? Reply
    Klebanoff, Mark A.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 130 (02): : 463 - 464
  • [3] Interpregnancy Interval and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: An Analysis of Successive Pregnancies Reply
    Hanley, Gillian E.
    Hutcheon, Jennifer A.
    Kinniburgh, Brooke A.
    Lee, Lily
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 130 (02): : 465 - 466
  • [4] Short interpregnancy interval can lead to adverse pregnancy outcomes: A meta-analysis
    Wang, Yumei
    Zeng, Can
    Chen, Yuhong
    Yang, Liu
    Tian, Di
    Liu, Xinghui
    Lin, Yonghong
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [5] The role of intervening pregnancy loss in the association between interpregnancy interval and adverse pregnancy outcomes
    Tessema, Gizachew A.
    Haberg, Siri E.
    Pereira, Gavin
    Magnus, Maria C.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2022, 129 (11) : 1853 - 1861
  • [6] Interpregnancy interval following miscarriage and adverse pregnancy outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kangatharan, Chrishny
    Labram, Saffi
    Bhattacharya, Sohinee
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2017, 23 (02) : 221 - 231
  • [7] Interpregnancy Interval and Pregnancy Outcomes Causal or Not?
    Klebanoff, Mark A.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 129 (03): : 405 - 407
  • [8] Interpregnancy Interval After Termination of Pregnancy and the Risks of Adverse Outcomes in Subsequent Birth
    Mannisto, Jaana
    Bloigu, Aini
    Mentula, Maarit
    Gissler, Mika
    Heikinheimo, Oskari
    Niinimaki, Maarit
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 129 (02): : 347 - 354
  • [9] Interpregnancy Interval After Termination of Pregnancy and the Risks of Adverse Outcomes in Subsequent Birth
    Creinin, Mitchell D.
    Trussell, James
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 129 (05): : 944 - 944
  • [10] Association of Interpregnancy Interval With Adverse Birth Outcomes
    Xu, Ting
    Miao, Huazhang
    Chen, Yuliang
    Luo, Limei
    Guo, Pi
    Zhu, Yingxian
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2022, 5 (06) : E2216658