Evaluation of a new system, VITEK 2, for identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of enterococci

被引:0
|
作者
Garcia-Garrote, F [1 ]
Cercenado, E [1 ]
Bouza, E [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Gen Univ Gregorio Maranon, Microbiol Serv, Madrid 28007, Spain
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
We evaluated the new automated VITEK 2 system (bioMerieux) for the identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of enterococci, The results obtained with the VITEK 2 system were compared to those obtained by reference methods: standard identification by the scheme of Facklam and Sahm (R. R. Facklam and D. F. Sahm, p. 308-314, in P. R. Murray et al,, ed., Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 6th ed., 1995] and with the API 20 STREP system and, for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, broth microdilution and agar dilution methods by the procedures of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. The presence of vanA and vanB genes was determined by PCR, A total of 150 clinical isolates were studied, corresponding to 60 Enterococcus faecalis, 55 Enterococcus faecium, 26 Enterococcus gallinarum, 5 Enterococcus avium, 2 Enterococcus durans, and 2 Enterococcus raffinosus isolates. Among those isolates, 131 (87%) were correctly identified to the species level with the VITEK 2 system. Approximately half of the misidentifications were for E. faecium with low-level resistance to vancomycin, identified as E. gallinarum or E. casselifiavus; however, a motility test solved the discrepancies and increased the agreement to 94%, Among the strains studied, 66% were vancomycin resistant (57 VanA, 16 VanB, and 26 VanC strains), 23% were ampicillin resistant (MICs, greater than or equal to 16 mu g/ml), 31% were high-level gentamicin resistant, and 45% were high-level streptomycin resistant. Percentages of agreement for susceptibility and resistance to ampicillin, vancomycin, and teicoplanin and for high-level gentamicin resistance and high-level streptomycin resistance were 93, 95, 97, 97, and 96%, respectively. The accuracy of identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of enterococci with the VITEK 2 system, together with the significant reduction in handling time, will have a positive impact on the work flow of the clinical microbiology laboratory.
引用
收藏
页码:2108 / 2111
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of vancomycinresistant Enterococcus by the VITEK 2 system, and comparison with two NCCLS reference methods
    Kobayashi, I
    Muraoka, H
    Iyoda, T
    Nishida, M
    Hasegawa, M
    Yamaguchi, K
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2004, 53 (12) : 1229 - 1232
  • [32] Detection of volatile organic compounds as new paradigm to accelerate antimicrobial susceptibility testing: performance evaluation of VITEK® REVEAL™
    Bianco, Gabriele
    Boattini, Matteo
    Comini, Sara
    Bondi, Alessandro
    Curtoni, Antonio
    Piccinini, Giorgia
    Musso, Tiziana
    Broccolo, Francesco
    Cavallo, Rossana
    Nordmann, Patrice
    Costa, Cristina
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2024, 79 (09) : 2237 - 2245
  • [33] Performance of the VITEK2 system for identification and susceptibility testing of routine Enterobacteriaceae clinical isolates
    Pérez-Vázquez, M
    Oliver, A
    del Saz, BS
    Loza, E
    Baquero, F
    Cantón, R
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2001, 17 (05) : 371 - 376
  • [34] EVALUATION OF VITEK 2 SYSTEM FOR CLINICAL IDENTIFICATION OF CANDIDA SPECIES AND THEIR ANTIFUNGAL SUSCEPTIBILITY TEST
    Sundaram, Mohan
    Navaneethakrishnan, Ram Murugan
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2016, 5 (47): : 3048 - 3051
  • [35] Evaluation of antimicrobial susceptibility testing directly from positive blood cultures using the Vitek 2 system: comparison of two rapid protocols
    Porte, Lorena
    Gattini, Francesca
    Varela, Carmen
    Weitzel, Thomas
    REVISTA CHILENA DE INFECTOLOGIA, 2017, 34 (02): : 190 - +
  • [36] Performance Evaluation of VITEK 2 System in Meropenem Susceptibility Testing of Clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates
    Acuner, Ibrahim Cagatay
    Bayramoglu, Gulcin
    Birinci, Asuman
    Cihan, Cigdem Cekic
    Bek, Yuksel
    Durupinar, Belma
    MIKROBIYOLOJI BULTENI, 2011, 45 (03): : 411 - 421
  • [37] Evaluation of the new VITEK 2 system for determination of the susceptibility of clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae
    Chávez, M
    López, JLG
    Coronilla, J
    Valverde, A
    Serrano, MC
    Claro, R
    Mazuelos, EM
    CHEMOTHERAPY, 2002, 48 (01) : 26 - 30
  • [38] Rapid automated antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Streptococcus pneumoniae by use of the bioMerieux VITEK 2
    Jorgensen, JH
    Barry, AL
    Traczewski, MM
    Sahm, DF
    McElmeel, ML
    Crawford, SA
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2000, 38 (08) : 2814 - 2818
  • [39] EVALUATION OF VITEK AND API-20S FOR SPECIES IDENTIFICATION OF ENTEROCOCCI
    SADER, HS
    BIEDENBACH, D
    JONES, RN
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 1995, 22 (04) : 315 - 319
  • [40] Multicenter laboratory evaluation of the bioMerieux Vitek antimicrobial susceptibility testing system with 11 antimicrobial agents versus members of the family Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
    Doern, GV
    Brueggemann, AB
    Perla, R
    Daly, J
    Halkias, D
    Jones, RN
    Saubolle, MA
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1997, 35 (08) : 2115 - 2119