Evaluation of a new system, VITEK 2, for identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of enterococci

被引:0
|
作者
Garcia-Garrote, F [1 ]
Cercenado, E [1 ]
Bouza, E [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Gen Univ Gregorio Maranon, Microbiol Serv, Madrid 28007, Spain
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
We evaluated the new automated VITEK 2 system (bioMerieux) for the identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of enterococci, The results obtained with the VITEK 2 system were compared to those obtained by reference methods: standard identification by the scheme of Facklam and Sahm (R. R. Facklam and D. F. Sahm, p. 308-314, in P. R. Murray et al,, ed., Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 6th ed., 1995] and with the API 20 STREP system and, for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, broth microdilution and agar dilution methods by the procedures of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. The presence of vanA and vanB genes was determined by PCR, A total of 150 clinical isolates were studied, corresponding to 60 Enterococcus faecalis, 55 Enterococcus faecium, 26 Enterococcus gallinarum, 5 Enterococcus avium, 2 Enterococcus durans, and 2 Enterococcus raffinosus isolates. Among those isolates, 131 (87%) were correctly identified to the species level with the VITEK 2 system. Approximately half of the misidentifications were for E. faecium with low-level resistance to vancomycin, identified as E. gallinarum or E. casselifiavus; however, a motility test solved the discrepancies and increased the agreement to 94%, Among the strains studied, 66% were vancomycin resistant (57 VanA, 16 VanB, and 26 VanC strains), 23% were ampicillin resistant (MICs, greater than or equal to 16 mu g/ml), 31% were high-level gentamicin resistant, and 45% were high-level streptomycin resistant. Percentages of agreement for susceptibility and resistance to ampicillin, vancomycin, and teicoplanin and for high-level gentamicin resistance and high-level streptomycin resistance were 93, 95, 97, 97, and 96%, respectively. The accuracy of identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of enterococci with the VITEK 2 system, together with the significant reduction in handling time, will have a positive impact on the work flow of the clinical microbiology laboratory.
引用
收藏
页码:2108 / 2111
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Performance of the VITEK®2 advanced expert system™ for the validation of antimicrobial susceptibility testing results
    L Pages monteiro
    N. Von Allmen
    I. Friesen
    K. Huth
    G. Zambardi
    European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 2021, 40 : 1333 - 1335
  • [22] Evaluation of VITEK 2 rapid identification and susceptibility testing system against Gram-negative clinical isolates
    Ling, TKW
    Tam, PC
    Liu, ZK
    Cheng, AFB
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2001, 39 (08) : 2964 - 2966
  • [23] Evaluation of the VITEK 2 cards for identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of non-glucose-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli
    Hsieh, Wen-Shyang
    Sung, Ling-Ling
    Tsai, Kun-Chou
    Ho, Hsin-Tsung
    APMIS, 2009, 117 (04) : 241 - 247
  • [24] Evaluation of Vitek system for susceptibility testing of Enterococcus faecium isolates
    Lee, HK
    Park, YJ
    Kwon, HJ
    Lee, EJ
    Kim, BK
    Kang, CS
    ANNALS OF CLINICAL AND LABORATORY SCIENCE, 2004, 34 (01): : 83 - 86
  • [25] Use of positive blood cultures for direct identification and susceptibility testing with the Vitek 2 system
    de Cueto, M
    Ceballos, E
    Martinez-Martinez, L
    Perea, EJ
    Pascual, A
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2004, 42 (08) : 3734 - 3738
  • [26] Effect of antimicrobial stewardship with rapid MALDI-TOF identification and Vitek 2 antimicrobial susceptibility testing on hospitalization outcome
    Cavalieri, Stephen J.
    Kwon, Seunghyug
    Vivekanandan, Renuga
    Ased, Sumaya
    Carroll, Cassara
    Anthone, Jennifer
    Schmidt, David
    Baysden, Maddy
    Destache, Christopher J.
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2019, 95 (02) : 208 - 211
  • [27] Performance of Vitek 2 for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Enterobacteriaceae with Vitek 2 (2009 FDA) and 2014 CLSI Breakpoints
    Bobenchik, April M.
    Deak, Eszter
    Hindler, Janet A.
    Charlton, Carmen L.
    Humphries, Romney M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2015, 53 (03) : 816 - 823
  • [28] Evaluation of a Rapid System for Antimicrobial Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing in Pediatric Bloodstream Infections
    Ward, Eric
    Weller, Kevin
    Gomez, Jacquelyn
    Roman, Kiana
    Cardenas, Ana Maria
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2018, 56 (09)
  • [29] Evaluation of Vitek2 and BD Phoenix in antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
    Jekarl, Dong Wook
    Han, Sang Bong
    Kim, Yoon Joo
    Shin, Sang Hyun
    Park, Kang Gyun
    Park, Jung Jun
    Han, Kyungja
    Park, Yeon-Joon
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2010, 67 (04) : 384 - 386
  • [30] Multicenter evaluation of rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing by VITEK®2 directly from positive blood culture
    Paluch, Maxime
    Lleres-Vadeboin, Manon
    Poupet, Helene
    Chanard, Emmanuel
    Wilhelm, Nathalie
    Nadji, Safia
    Prots, Laurence
    Bala, Yohann
    Zambardi, Gilles
    Cattoen, Christian
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2023, 106 (03)