On osseointegration in relation to implant surfaces

被引:219
|
作者
Albrektsson, Tomas [1 ,2 ]
Wennerberg, Ann [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gothenburg, Dept Biomat, Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Univ Malmo, Dept Prosthodont, Malmo, Sweden
[3] Univ Gothenburg, Dept Prosthodont, Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
implant surface; osseointegration; titanium; FOREIGN-BODY REACTION; TITANIUM IMPLANTS; OSTEOGENIC MARKERS; GENE-EXPRESSION; BONE LOSS; PROLIFERATION; MAGNESIUM; ADHESION; TISSUE; DISCS;
D O I
10.1111/cid.12742
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background The understanding of mechanisms of osseointegration as well as applied knowledge about oral implant surfaces are of paramount importance for successful clinical results. Purpose The aim of the present article is to present an overview of osseointegration mechanisms and an introduction to surface innovations with relevance for osseointegration that will be published in the same supplement of Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. Materials and Methods The present article is a narrative review of some osseointegration and implant surface-related details. Results and Conclusions Osseointegration has a changed definition since it is realized today that oral implants are but foreign bodies and that this fact explains osseointegration as a protection mechanism of the tissues. Given adequate stability, bone tissue is formed around titanium implants to shield them from the tissues. Oral implant surfaces may be characterized by microroughness and nanoroughness, by surface chemical composition and by physical and mechanical parameters. An isotropic, moderately rough implant surface such as seen on the TiUnite device has displayed improved clinical results compared to previously used minimally rough or rough surfaces. However, there is a lack of clinical evidence supporting any particular type of nanoroughness pattern that, at best, is documented with results from animal studies. It is possible, but as yet unproven, that clinical results may be supported by a certain chemical composition of the implant surface. The same can be said with respect to hydrophilicity of implant surfaces; positive animal data may suggest some promise, but there is a lack of clinical evidence that hydrophilic implants result in improved clinical outcome of more hydrophobic surfaces. With respect to mechanical properties, it seems obvious that those must be encompassing the loading of oral implants, but we need more research on the mechanically ideal implant surface from a clinical aspect.
引用
收藏
页码:4 / 7
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Osseointegration of implant surfaces in metabolic syndrome and type-2 diabetes mellitus
    Bergamo, Edmara T. P.
    de Oliveira, Paula G. F. P.
    Campos, Tiago M. B.
    Bonfante, Estevam A.
    Tovar, Nick
    Boczar, Daniel
    Nayak, Vasudev Vivekanand
    Coelho, Paulo G.
    Witek, Lukasz
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART B-APPLIED BIOMATERIALS, 2024, 112 (02)
  • [22] Osseointegration effects of local release of strontium ranelate from implant surfaces in rats
    Ali Alenezi
    Silvia Galli
    Saba Atefyekta
    Martin Andersson
    Ann Wennerberg
    Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 2019, 30
  • [23] Osseointegration effects of local release of strontium ranelate from implant surfaces in rats
    Alenezi, Ali
    Galli, Silvia
    Atefyekta, Saba
    Andersson, Martin
    Wennerberg, Ann
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE-MATERIALS IN MEDICINE, 2019, 30 (10)
  • [24] Does incorporating zinc in titanium implant surfaces influence osseointegration? A systematic review
    Kellesarian, Sergio Varela
    Yunker, Michael
    Ramakrishnaiah, Ravikumar
    Malmstrom, Hans
    Kellesarian, Tammy Varela
    Malignaggi, Vanessa Ros
    Javed, Fawad
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2017, 117 (01): : 41 - 47
  • [25] Histomorphometric analysis of the osseointegration of four different implant surfaces in the femoral epiphyses of rabbits
    Le Guehennec, Laurent
    Goyenvalle, Eric
    Lopez-Heredia, Marco-Antonio
    Weiss, Pierre
    Amouriq, Yves
    Layrolle, Pierre
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2008, 19 (11) : 1103 - 1110
  • [26] Biological Aging of Implant Surfaces and Their Restoration with Ultraviolet Light Treatment: A Novel Understanding of Osseointegration
    Att, Wael
    Ogawa, Takahiro
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2012, 27 (04) : 753 - 761
  • [27] Histologic studies on osseointegration: Soft tissues response to implant surfaces and components. A review
    Piattelli, Adriano
    Farias Pontes, Ana Emilia
    Degidi, Marco
    Iezzi, Giovanna
    DENTAL MATERIALS, 2011, 27 (01) : 53 - 60
  • [28] Sequential healing events of osseointegration at UnicCa® and SLActive® implant surfaces: an experimental study in the dog
    Favero, Riccardo
    Lang, Niklaus P.
    Salata, Luiz A.
    Martins Neto, Evandro Carneiro
    Caroprese, Marino
    Botticelli, Daniele
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2016, 27 (02) : 203 - 210
  • [29] Comparison of Osseointegration on Various Implant Surfaces After Bacterial Contamination and Cleaning: A Rabbit Study
    Yuan, Kuo
    Chan, Ying-Jen
    Kung, Kuan-Chen
    Lee, Tzer-Min
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2014, 29 (01) : 32 - 40
  • [30] Modifications of Dental Implant Surfaces at the Micro- and Nano-Level for Enhanced Osseointegration
    Yeo, In-Sung Luke
    MATERIALS, 2020, 13 (01) : 89