On osseointegration in relation to implant surfaces

被引:219
|
作者
Albrektsson, Tomas [1 ,2 ]
Wennerberg, Ann [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gothenburg, Dept Biomat, Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Univ Malmo, Dept Prosthodont, Malmo, Sweden
[3] Univ Gothenburg, Dept Prosthodont, Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
implant surface; osseointegration; titanium; FOREIGN-BODY REACTION; TITANIUM IMPLANTS; OSTEOGENIC MARKERS; GENE-EXPRESSION; BONE LOSS; PROLIFERATION; MAGNESIUM; ADHESION; TISSUE; DISCS;
D O I
10.1111/cid.12742
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background The understanding of mechanisms of osseointegration as well as applied knowledge about oral implant surfaces are of paramount importance for successful clinical results. Purpose The aim of the present article is to present an overview of osseointegration mechanisms and an introduction to surface innovations with relevance for osseointegration that will be published in the same supplement of Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. Materials and Methods The present article is a narrative review of some osseointegration and implant surface-related details. Results and Conclusions Osseointegration has a changed definition since it is realized today that oral implants are but foreign bodies and that this fact explains osseointegration as a protection mechanism of the tissues. Given adequate stability, bone tissue is formed around titanium implants to shield them from the tissues. Oral implant surfaces may be characterized by microroughness and nanoroughness, by surface chemical composition and by physical and mechanical parameters. An isotropic, moderately rough implant surface such as seen on the TiUnite device has displayed improved clinical results compared to previously used minimally rough or rough surfaces. However, there is a lack of clinical evidence supporting any particular type of nanoroughness pattern that, at best, is documented with results from animal studies. It is possible, but as yet unproven, that clinical results may be supported by a certain chemical composition of the implant surface. The same can be said with respect to hydrophilicity of implant surfaces; positive animal data may suggest some promise, but there is a lack of clinical evidence that hydrophilic implants result in improved clinical outcome of more hydrophobic surfaces. With respect to mechanical properties, it seems obvious that those must be encompassing the loading of oral implants, but we need more research on the mechanically ideal implant surface from a clinical aspect.
引用
收藏
页码:4 / 7
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Characterization of Five Different Implant Surfaces and Their Effect on Osseointegration: A Study in Dogs
    Coelho, Paulo G.
    Bonfante, Estevam A.
    Pessoa, Roberto S.
    Marin, Charles
    Granato, Rodrigo
    Giro, Gabriela
    Witek, Lukasz
    Suzuki, Marcelo
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2011, 82 (05) : 742 - 750
  • [12] Osseointegration on implant surfaces previously contaminated with plaque -: An experimental study in the dog
    Kolonidis, SG
    Renvert, S
    Hämmerle, CHF
    Lang, NP
    Harris, D
    Claffey, N
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2003, 14 (04) : 373 - 380
  • [13] Effects of different hierarchical hybrid micro/nanostructure surfaces on implant osseointegration
    Cheng, Bingkun
    Niu, Qiang
    Cui, Yajun
    Jiang, Wei
    Zhao, Yunzhuan
    Kong, Liang
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2017, 19 (03) : 539 - 548
  • [14] Nano-scale modification of titanium implant surfaces to enhance osseointegration
    Souza, Julio C. M.
    Sordi, Mariane B.
    Kanazawa, Miya
    Ravindran, Sriram
    Henriques, Bruno
    Silva, Filipe S.
    Aparicio, Conrado
    Cooper, Lyndon F.
    ACTA BIOMATERIALIA, 2019, 94 : 112 - 131
  • [15] The effect of nano hydroxyapatite coating implant surfaces on gene expression and osseointegration
    Kasai, Hironori
    Bergamo, Edmara T. P.
    Balderrama, Isis de Fatima
    Imamura, Kentaro
    Witek, Lukasz
    Jalkh, Ernesto B. Benalcazar
    Bonfante, Estevam A.
    Inoue, Kenji
    Coelho, Paulo G.
    Yamano, Seiichi
    MEDICINA ORAL PATOLOGIA ORAL Y CIRUGIA BUCAL, 2024, 29 (03): : e326 - e333
  • [16] Osseointegration of different implant surfaces in poor bone quality sites.
    Weng, D
    Hoffmeyer, M
    Richter, EJ
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2002, 81 : A489 - A489
  • [17] Osseointegration on metallic implant surfaces: Effects of microgeometry and growth factor treatment
    Frenkel, SR
    Simon, J
    Alexander, H
    Dennis, M
    Ricci, JL
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH, 2002, 63 (06): : 706 - 713
  • [19] Biology of implant osseointegration
    Mavrogenis, A. F.
    Dimitriou, R.
    Parvizi, J.
    Babis, G. C.
    JOURNAL OF MUSCULOSKELETAL & NEURONAL INTERACTIONS, 2009, 9 (02) : 61 - 71
  • [20] Effect of Strontium-Substituted Nanohydroxyapatite Coating of Porous Implant Surfaces on Implant Osseointegration in a Rabbit Model
    Yang, Guo-li
    Song, Li-na
    Jiang, Qiao-hong
    Wang, Xiao-xiang
    Zhao, Shi-fang
    He, Fu-ming
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2012, 27 (06) : 1332 - 1339