On osseointegration in relation to implant surfaces

被引:219
|
作者
Albrektsson, Tomas [1 ,2 ]
Wennerberg, Ann [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gothenburg, Dept Biomat, Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Univ Malmo, Dept Prosthodont, Malmo, Sweden
[3] Univ Gothenburg, Dept Prosthodont, Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
implant surface; osseointegration; titanium; FOREIGN-BODY REACTION; TITANIUM IMPLANTS; OSTEOGENIC MARKERS; GENE-EXPRESSION; BONE LOSS; PROLIFERATION; MAGNESIUM; ADHESION; TISSUE; DISCS;
D O I
10.1111/cid.12742
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background The understanding of mechanisms of osseointegration as well as applied knowledge about oral implant surfaces are of paramount importance for successful clinical results. Purpose The aim of the present article is to present an overview of osseointegration mechanisms and an introduction to surface innovations with relevance for osseointegration that will be published in the same supplement of Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. Materials and Methods The present article is a narrative review of some osseointegration and implant surface-related details. Results and Conclusions Osseointegration has a changed definition since it is realized today that oral implants are but foreign bodies and that this fact explains osseointegration as a protection mechanism of the tissues. Given adequate stability, bone tissue is formed around titanium implants to shield them from the tissues. Oral implant surfaces may be characterized by microroughness and nanoroughness, by surface chemical composition and by physical and mechanical parameters. An isotropic, moderately rough implant surface such as seen on the TiUnite device has displayed improved clinical results compared to previously used minimally rough or rough surfaces. However, there is a lack of clinical evidence supporting any particular type of nanoroughness pattern that, at best, is documented with results from animal studies. It is possible, but as yet unproven, that clinical results may be supported by a certain chemical composition of the implant surface. The same can be said with respect to hydrophilicity of implant surfaces; positive animal data may suggest some promise, but there is a lack of clinical evidence that hydrophilic implants result in improved clinical outcome of more hydrophobic surfaces. With respect to mechanical properties, it seems obvious that those must be encompassing the loading of oral implants, but we need more research on the mechanically ideal implant surface from a clinical aspect.
引用
收藏
页码:4 / 7
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Novel surfaces and osseointegration in implant dentistry
    Pellegrini, Gaia
    Francetti, Luca
    Barbaro, Bruno
    del Fabbro, Massimo
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL DENTISTRY, 2018, 9 (04) : e12349
  • [2] Biologically modified implant surfaces for improved outcomes of osseointegration
    Hayes, J. S.
    Devine, D. M.
    O'Donoghue, J.
    Barry, F.
    Murphy, M. J.
    JOURNAL OF TISSUE ENGINEERING AND REGENERATIVE MEDICINE, 2012, 6 : 26 - 26
  • [3] Antiadipogenesis and Osseointegration of Strontium-Doped Implant Surfaces
    Zhou, C.
    Chen, Y. Q.
    Zhu, Y. H.
    Lin, G. F.
    Zhang, L. F.
    Liu, X. C.
    He, F. M.
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2019, 98 (07) : 795 - 802
  • [4] Early osseointegration to hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in humans
    Lang, Niklaus P.
    Salvi, Giovanni E.
    Huynh-Ba, Guy
    Ivanovski, Saso
    Donos, Nikolaos
    Bosshardt, Dieter D.
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2011, 22 (04) : 349 - 356
  • [5] Effect of contamination of implant surfaces on re-osseointegration
    Kolonidis, S
    Renvert, S
    Claffey, N
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2001, 80 (04) : 1173 - 1173
  • [6] Microscopic view of osseointegration and functional mechanisms of implant surfaces
    Han, Guang
    Shen, Zhijian
    MATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING C-MATERIALS FOR BIOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2015, 56 : 380 - 385
  • [7] Nanoscale hybrid implant surfaces and Osterix-mediated osseointegration
    Morandini Rodrigues, Lais
    Lima Zutin, Elis A.
    Sartori, Elisa M.
    Rizzante, Fabio A. P.
    Mendonca, Daniela B. S.
    Krebsbach, Paul H.
    Jepsen, Karl J.
    Cooper, Lyndon F.
    Vasconcellos, Luana M. R.
    Mendonca, Gustavo
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART A, 2022, 110 (03) : 696 - 707
  • [8] Laminin coatings on implant surfaces promote osseointegration: Fact or fiction?
    Javed, Fawad
    Al Amri, Mohammad D.
    Kellesarian, Sergio Varela
    Al-Askar, Mansour
    Al-Kheraif, Abdulaziz A.
    Romanos, Georgios E.
    ARCHIVES OF ORAL BIOLOGY, 2016, 68 : 153 - 161
  • [9] Can implant surfaces affect implant stability during osseointegration? A randomized clinical trial
    do Carmo Filho, Luiz Carlos
    Marcello-Machado, Raissa Micaella
    de Castilhos, Eduardo Dickie
    Del Bel Cury, Altair Antoninha
    Faot, Fernanda
    BRAZILIAN ORAL RESEARCH, 2018, 32
  • [10] Implant stability in relation to osseointegration: an experimental study in the Labrador dog
    Abrahamsson, Ingemar
    Linder, Elena
    Lang, Niklaus P.
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2009, 20 (03) : 313 - 318