Double read screening mammograms: the use of a third reader to arbitrate on disagreements

被引:4
|
作者
Mucci, B [1 ]
Athey, G [1 ]
Scarisbrick, G [1 ]
机构
[1] W Cumberland Hosp, Cumbria Breast Screening Serv, Whitehaven CA28 8JG, Cumbria, England
来源
BREAST | 1999年 / 8卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0960-9776(99)90337-5
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Screening mammograms from a county wide breast screening programme were double read by any 2 from a team of 3 radiologists. There were 398 cases where the 2 readers disagreed. The third radiologist was asked to arbitrate on these. The third reader recalled 49% and returned the other 51% to normal screening. From the 196 recalled for assessment, 9 underwent histological examination and from these, 4 malignant lesions were found. From the 202 sent to normal screening, one true interval cancer has occurred during 3 years of follow-up. Double reading mammography increases the sensitivity of screening. If this is combined with arbitration in disagreements the number of unnecessary recalls is reduced.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 39
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Why Does It Take Longer to Read Digital Than Film-Screen Screening Mammograms? A Partial Explanation
    Haygood, Tamara Miner
    Wang, Jihong
    Lane, Deanna
    Galvan, Eva
    Atkinson, E. Neely
    Stephens, Tanya
    Whitman, Gary J.
    JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2010, 23 (02) : 170 - 180
  • [42] Why Does It Take Longer to Read Digital Than Film-Screen Screening Mammograms? A Partial Explanation
    Tamara Miner Haygood
    Jihong Wang
    Deanna Lane
    Eva Galvan
    E. Neely Atkinson
    Tanya Stephens
    Gary J. Whitman
    Journal of Digital Imaging, 2010, 23 : 170 - 180
  • [43] Modeling Radiologists' Assessments to Explore Pairing Strategies for Optimized Double Reading of Screening Mammograms
    Gommers, Jessie J. J.
    Abbey, Craig K.
    Strand, Fredrik
    Taylor-Phillips, Sian
    Jenkinson, David J.
    Larsen, Marthe
    Hofvind, Solveig
    Broeders, Mireille J. M.
    Sechopoulos, Ioannis
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2024, 44 (07) : 828 - 842
  • [44] Mammography screening: An incremental cost effectiveness analysis of double versus single reading of mammograms
    Brown, J
    Bryan, S
    Warren, R
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 312 (7034): : 809 - 812
  • [45] Introduction of additional double reading of mammograms by radiographers: Effects on a biennial screening programme outcome
    Duijm, Lucien E. M.
    Groenewoud, Johanna H.
    Fracheboud, Jacques
    van Ineveld, B. Martin
    Roumen, Rudi M. H.
    de Koning, Harry J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2008, 44 (09) : 1223 - 1228
  • [46] The CAD-reader association is as good as a double reading in a screening situation
    Gilbert, F. J.
    Astley, S. M.
    Gillan, M. G.
    Agbaje, O. F.
    Wallis, M. G.
    James, J.
    IMAGERIE DE LA FEMME, 2008, 18 (04) : 284 - 284
  • [47] Can a single reader with CAD replace double reading in breast screening?
    Iyengar, GV
    Duncan, KA
    Gilbert, FJ
    Deans, HE
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2003, 82 : S20 - S20
  • [48] Ethnic and racialized disparities in the use of screening services for pap smears and mammograms in Canada
    Salami, Bukola O.
    Kalenga, Cindy Z.
    Olukotun, Mary
    Renzaho, Andre M. N.
    Maduforo, Aloysius Nwabugo
    Serrano-Lomelin, Jesus A.
    Tunde-Byass, Modupe
    King, Regine U.
    Richter, Solina
    Ladha, Tehseen
    Senthilselvan, Ambikaipakan
    Bailey, Paul
    Ospina, Maria B.
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (20):
  • [49] Women's attitudes and perspectives on the use of artificial intelligence in the assessment of screening mammograms
    Holen, Asne Sorlien
    Martiniussen, Marit Almenning
    Bergan, Marie Burns
    Moshina, Nataliia
    Hovda, Tone
    Hofvind, Solveig
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2024, 175
  • [50] MICROASSAY FOR SCREENING NEWBORNS FOR GALACTOSEMIA WITH USE OF A FLUOROMETRIC MICROPLATE READER
    YAMAGUCHI, A
    FUKUSHI, M
    MIZUSHIMA, Y
    SHIMIZU, Y
    TAKASUGI, N
    ARASHIMA, S
    OHYANAGI, K
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 1989, 35 (09) : 1962 - 1964