Women's attitudes and perspectives on the use of artificial intelligence in the assessment of screening mammograms

被引:1
|
作者
Holen, Asne Sorlien [1 ]
Martiniussen, Marit Almenning [2 ,3 ]
Bergan, Marie Burns [1 ]
Moshina, Nataliia [1 ]
Hovda, Tone [4 ]
Hofvind, Solveig [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Inst Publ Hlth, Canc Registry Norway, POB 222 Skoyen, N-0213 Oslo, Norway
[2] Ostfold Hosp Trust, Dept Radiol, Kalnes, Norway
[3] Univ Oslo, Inst Clin Med, Oslo, Norway
[4] Vestre Viken Hosp Trust, Dept Radiol, Drammen, Norway
[5] UiT Artic Univ Norway, Dept Hlth & Care Sci, Tromso, Norway
关键词
Breast neoplasms; Mass screening; Mammography; Artificial intelligence; Survey; Questionnaires; CANCER;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111431
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate attitudes and perspectives on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the assessment of screening mammograms among women invited to BreastScreen Norway. Method: An anonymous survey was sent to all women invited to BreastScreen Norway during the study period, October 10, 2022, to December 25, 2022 (n = 84,543). Questions were answered on a 10-point Likert scale and as multiple-choice, addressing knowledge of AI, willingness to participate in AI studies, information needs, confidence in AI results and AI assisted reading strategies, and thoughts on concerns and benefits of AI in mammography screening. Analyses were performed using chi 2 and logistic regression tests. Results: General knowledge of AI was reported as extensive by 11.0% of the 8,355 respondents. Respondents were willing to participate in studies using AI either for decision support (64.0%) or triaging (54.9%). Being informed about use of AI-assisted image assessment was considered important, and a reading strategy of AI in combination with one radiologist preferred. Having extensive knowledge of AI was associated with willingness to participate in AI studies (decision support; odds ratio [OR]: 5.1, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.1-6.4, and triaging; OR: 3.4, 95% CI: 2.8-4.0) and trust in AI's independent assessment (OR: 6.8, 95% CI: 5.7, 8.3). Conclusions: Women invited to BreastScreen Norway had a positive attitude towards the use of AI in image assessment, given that human readers are still involved. Targeted information and increased public knowledge of AI could help achieve high participation in AI studies and successful implementation of AI in mammography screening.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of Combined Artificial Intelligence and Radiologist Assessment to Interpret Screening Mammograms
    Schaffter, Thomas
    Buist, Diana S. M.
    Lee, Christoph, I
    Nikulin, Yaroslav
    Ribli, Dezso
    Guan, Yuanfang
    Lotter, William
    Jie, Zequn
    Du, Hao
    Wang, Sijia
    Feng, Jiashi
    Feng, Mengling
    Kim, Hyo-Eun
    Albiol, Francisco
    Albiol, Alberto
    Morrell, Stephen
    Wojna, Zbigniew
    Ahsen, Mehmet Eren
    Asif, Umar
    Yepes, Antonio Jimeno
    Yohanandan, Shivanthan
    Rabinovici-Cohen, Simona
    Yi, Darvin
    Hoff, Bruce
    Yu, Thomas
    Neto, Elias Chaibub
    Rubin, Daniel L.
    Lindholm, Peter
    Margolies, Laurie R.
    McBride, Russell Bailey
    Rothstein, Joseph H.
    Sieh, Weiva
    Ben-Ari, Rami
    Harrer, Stefan
    Trister, Andrew
    Friend, Stephen
    Norman, Thea
    Sahiner, Berkman
    Strand, Fredrik
    Guinney, Justin
    Stolovitzky, Gustavo
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2020, 3 (03) : E200265
  • [2] Australian women's judgements about using artificial intelligence to read mammograms in breast cancer screening
    Carter, Stacy M.
    Carolan, Lucy
    Aquino, Yves Saint James
    Frazer, Helen
    Rogers, Wendy A.
    Hall, Julie
    Degeling, Chris
    Braunack-Mayer, Annette
    Houssami, Nehmat
    DIGITAL HEALTH, 2023, 9
  • [3] Population-wide evaluation of artificial intelligence and radiologist assessment of screening mammograms
    Kuhl, Johanne
    Elhakim, Mohammad Talal
    Stougaard, Sarah Wordenskjold
    Rasmussen, Benjamin Schnack Brandt
    Nielsen, Mads
    Gerke, Oke
    Larsen, Lisbet Bronsro
    Graumann, Ole
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2024, 34 (06) : 3935 - 3946
  • [4] External Evaluation of 3 Commercial Artificial Intelligence Algorithms for Independent Assessment of Screening Mammograms
    Salim, Mattie
    Wahlin, Erik
    Dembrower, Karin
    Azavedo, Edward
    Foukakis, Theodoros
    Liu, Yue
    Smith, Kevin
    Eklund, Martin
    Strand, Fredrik
    JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2020, 6 (10) : 1581 - 1588
  • [5] Artificial Intelligence to Support Independent Assessment of Screening Mammograms-The Time Has Come
    Lehman, Constance Dobbins
    JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2020, 6 (10) : 1588 - 1589
  • [6] Women's perspectives on the use of artificial intelligence (AI)-based technologies in mental healthcare
    Turchioe, Meghan Reading
    Harkins, Sarah
    Desai, Pooja
    Kumar, Shiveen
    Kim, Jessica
    Hermann, Alison
    Joly, Rochelle
    Zhang, Yiye
    Pathak, Jyotishman
    Benda, Natalie C.
    JAMIA OPEN, 2023, 6 (03)
  • [7] Beyond the AJR: " External Evaluation of 3 Commercial Artificial Intelligence Algorithms for Independent Assessment of Screening Mammograms"
    Gastounioti, Aimilia
    Conant, Emily F.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2021, 216 (06) : 1436 - 1436
  • [8] Identifying normal mammograms in a large screening population using artificial intelligence
    Lang, Kristina
    Dustler, Magnus
    Dahlblom, Victor
    Akesson, Anna
    Andersson, Ingvar
    Zackrisson, Sophia
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2021, 31 (03) : 1687 - 1692
  • [9] Identifying normal mammograms in a large screening population using artificial intelligence
    Kristina Lång
    Magnus Dustler
    Victor Dahlblom
    Anna Åkesson
    Ingvar Andersson
    Sophia Zackrisson
    European Radiology, 2021, 31 : 1687 - 1692
  • [10] Screening participants' attitudes to the introduction of artificial intelligence in breast screening
    de Vries, Clarisse F.
    Morrissey, Brian E.
    Duggan, Donna
    Staff, Roger T.
    Lip, Gerald
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2021, 28 (03) : 221 - 222