Identifying normal mammograms in a large screening population using artificial intelligence

被引:65
|
作者
Lang, Kristina [1 ,2 ]
Dustler, Magnus [1 ]
Dahlblom, Victor [1 ,3 ]
Akesson, Anna [4 ]
Andersson, Ingvar [1 ,2 ]
Zackrisson, Sophia [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Dept Translat Med, Diagnost Radiol, Inga Maria Nilssons Gata 47, SE-20502 Malmo, Sweden
[2] Skane Univ Hosp, Unilabs Mammog Unit, Jan Waldenstroms Gata 22, SE-20502 Malmo, Sweden
[3] Skane Univ Hosp, Radiol Dept, Inga Maria Nilssons Gata 47, SE-20502 Malmo, Sweden
[4] Skane Univ Hosp, Clin Studies Sweden Forum South, Lund, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Mammography; Mass screening; Breast cancer; Artificial intelligence; BREAST-CANCER; OVERDIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-020-07165-1
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives To evaluate the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) to identify normal mammograms in a screening population. Methods In this retrospective study, 9581 double-read mammography screening exams including 68 screen-detected cancers and 187 false positives, a subcohort of the prospective population-based Malmo Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial, were analysed with a deep learning-based AI system. The AI system categorises mammograms with a cancer risk score increasing from 1 to 10. The effect on cancer detection and false positives of excluding mammograms below different AI risk thresholds from reading by radiologists was investigated. A panel of three breast radiologists assessed the radiographic appearance, type, and visibility of screen-detected cancers assigned low-risk scores (<= 5). The reduction of normal exams, cancers, and false positives for the different thresholds was presented with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results If mammograms scored 1 and 2 were excluded from screen-reading, 1829 (19.1%; 95% CI 18.3-19.9) exams could be removed, including 10 (5.3%; 95% CI 2.1-8.6) false positives but no cancers. In total, 5082 (53.0%; 95% CI 52.0-54.0) exams, including 7 (10.3%; 95% CI 3.1-17.5) cancers and 52 (27.8%; 95% CI 21.4-34.2) false positives, had low-risk scores. All, except one, of the seven screen-detected cancers with low-risk scores were judged to be clearly visible. Conclusions The evaluated AI system can correctly identify a proportion of a screening population as cancer-free and also reduce false positives. Thus, AI has the potential to improve mammography screening efficiency.
引用
收藏
页码:1687 / 1692
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Identifying normal mammograms in a large screening population using artificial intelligence
    Kristina Lång
    Magnus Dustler
    Victor Dahlblom
    Anna Åkesson
    Ingvar Andersson
    Sophia Zackrisson
    [J]. European Radiology, 2021, 31 : 1687 - 1692
  • [2] Population-wide evaluation of artificial intelligence and radiologist assessment of screening mammograms
    Kuhl, Johanne
    Elhakim, Mohammad Talal
    Stougaard, Sarah Wordenskjold
    Rasmussen, Benjamin Schnack Brandt
    Nielsen, Mads
    Gerke, Oke
    Larsen, Lisbet Bronsro
    Graumann, Ole
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2024, 34 (06) : 3935 - 3946
  • [3] Evaluation of Combined Artificial Intelligence and Radiologist Assessment to Interpret Screening Mammograms
    Schaffter, Thomas
    Buist, Diana S. M.
    Lee, Christoph, I
    Nikulin, Yaroslav
    Ribli, Dezso
    Guan, Yuanfang
    Lotter, William
    Jie, Zequn
    Du, Hao
    Wang, Sijia
    Feng, Jiashi
    Feng, Mengling
    Kim, Hyo-Eun
    Albiol, Francisco
    Albiol, Alberto
    Morrell, Stephen
    Wojna, Zbigniew
    Ahsen, Mehmet Eren
    Asif, Umar
    Yepes, Antonio Jimeno
    Yohanandan, Shivanthan
    Rabinovici-Cohen, Simona
    Yi, Darvin
    Hoff, Bruce
    Yu, Thomas
    Neto, Elias Chaibub
    Rubin, Daniel L.
    Lindholm, Peter
    Margolies, Laurie R.
    McBride, Russell Bailey
    Rothstein, Joseph H.
    Sieh, Weiva
    Ben-Ari, Rami
    Harrer, Stefan
    Trister, Andrew
    Friend, Stephen
    Norman, Thea
    Sahiner, Berkman
    Strand, Fredrik
    Guinney, Justin
    Stolovitzky, Gustavo
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2020, 3 (03) : E200265
  • [4] Australian women's judgements about using artificial intelligence to read mammograms in breast cancer screening
    Carter, Stacy M.
    Carolan, Lucy
    Aquino, Yves Saint James
    Frazer, Helen
    Rogers, Wendy A.
    Hall, Julie
    Degeling, Chris
    Braunack-Mayer, Annette
    Houssami, Nehmat
    [J]. DIGITAL HEALTH, 2023, 9
  • [5] Women's attitudes and perspectives on the use of artificial intelligence in the assessment of screening mammograms
    Holen, Asne Sorlien
    Martiniussen, Marit Almenning
    Bergan, Marie Burns
    Moshina, Nataliia
    Hovda, Tone
    Hofvind, Solveig
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2024, 175
  • [6] Artificial Intelligence, Cancer Screening, and Population Health
    Merchant, Timothy
    Tanenbaum, Lawrence N.
    [J]. APPLIED RADIOLOGY, 2022, 51 (03) : 18 - 19
  • [7] The classification of normal screening mammograms
    Ang, Zoey Z. Y.
    Rawashdeh, Mohammad A.
    Heard, Robert
    Brennan, Patrick C.
    Lee, Warwick
    Lewis, Sarah J.
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGING 2016: IMAGE PERCEPTION, OBSERVER PERFORMANCE, AND TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2016, 9787
  • [8] Performance of an artificial intelligence automated system for diabetic eye screening in a large English population
    Meredith, Sarah
    van Grinsven, Mark
    Engelberts, Jonne
    Clarke, Dominic
    Prior, Vicki
    Vodrey, Jo
    Hammond, Alison
    Muhammed, Raja
    Kirby, Philip
    [J]. DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2023, 40 (06)
  • [9] External Evaluation of 3 Commercial Artificial Intelligence Algorithms for Independent Assessment of Screening Mammograms
    Salim, Mattie
    Wahlin, Erik
    Dembrower, Karin
    Azavedo, Edward
    Foukakis, Theodoros
    Liu, Yue
    Smith, Kevin
    Eklund, Martin
    Strand, Fredrik
    [J]. JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2020, 6 (10) : 1581 - 1588
  • [10] Artificial Intelligence to Support Independent Assessment of Screening Mammograms-The Time Has Come
    Lehman, Constance Dobbins
    [J]. JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2020, 6 (10) : 1588 - 1589