A Field of Expertise, the Organization, or Science Itself? Scientists' Perception of Representing Research in Public Communication

被引:58
|
作者
Horst, Maja [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Media Cognit & Commun, DK-2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark
关键词
communicating science; representation; scientific organizations; motivation; expertise; branding; enlightenment; ENGAGEMENT; IDENTITY; KNOWLEDGE; IMAGE;
D O I
10.1177/1075547013487513
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Social and political interest in science regularly prompts scientists to assume the role of public spokesperson. The article investigates this role of representing science as both speaking on behalf of science and symbolically standing for science and its organizations. With inspiration from the field of organizational communication, it is argued that science communication should be considered as an activity intimately linked with perceptions of identity and organizational culture. When scientists communicate publicly, they do not just disseminate knowledge, they also represent a particular sense making about what science, scientists, and scientific organizations are. Based on a qualitative analysis of 20 leading Danish scientists' views on their own role in public communication, three different modes of representation are identified: Expert, Research Manager, and Guardian of Science. Each of these modes of representation implies particular notions of quality, audience, motivation, and learning in science communication.
引用
收藏
页码:758 / 779
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Scientists, the Media, and the Public Communication of Science
    Dudo, Anthony
    [J]. SOCIOLOGY COMPASS, 2015, 9 (09): : 761 - 775
  • [2] Science communication media for scientists and the public
    Darzentas, Nikos
    Goldovsky, Leon
    Ouzounis, Christos A.
    [J]. EMBO REPORTS, 2007, 8 (10) : 886 - 887
  • [3] Public preferences for science occupations in the US: The influence of public perception of scientists and science
    Kim, Hyung Hoon
    [J]. 2007 ATLANTA CONFERENCE ON SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION POLICY, 2007, : 174 - 176
  • [4] Training scientists in a science center improves science communication to the public
    Webb, Alexis B.
    Fetsch, Christopher R.
    Israel, Elisa
    Roman, Christine M.
    Encarnacion, Cindy H.
    Zacks, Jeffrey M.
    Thoroughman, Kurt A.
    Herzog, Erik D.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN PHYSIOLOGY EDUCATION, 2012, 36 (01) : 72 - 76
  • [5] INFORMAL COMMUNICATION AMONG PERCEPTION RESEARCH SCIENTISTS IN JAPAN
    TACHI, T
    OKAZAWA, K
    TSUDA, Y
    [J]. LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE, 1979, (17): : 67 - 92
  • [6] Responsibility and science communication: scientists' experiences of and perspectives on public communication activities
    Lorono-Leturiondo, Maria
    Davies, Sarah R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RESPONSIBLE INNOVATION, 2018, 5 (02) : 170 - 185
  • [7] Research Field of Science Communication
    Franzen, Martina
    [J]. PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2018, 27 (06) : 753 - 754
  • [8] An Instrument for Assessing Scientists' Written Skills in Public Communication of Science
    Baram-Tsabari, Ayelet
    Lewenstein, Bruce V.
    [J]. SCIENCE COMMUNICATION, 2013, 35 (01) : 56 - 85
  • [9] Public communication from research institutes: is it science communication or public relations?
    Carver, Rebecca B.
    [J]. JCOM-JOURNAL OF SCIENCE COMMUNICATION, 2014, 13 (03):
  • [10] Referees or sponsors? The role of evaluators in the promotion of research scientists in a public research organization
    Glennie, Miriam
    O'Donnell, Michael
    Brown, Michelle
    Benson, John
    [J]. RESEARCH EVALUATION, 2019, 28 (01) : 63 - 72