Comparison of hyperemic efficacy between femoral and antecubital fossa vein adenosine infusion for fractional flow reserve assessment

被引:10
|
作者
Legutko, Jacek [1 ]
Kleczynski, Pawel [1 ]
Dziewierz, Artur [1 ]
Rzeszutko, Lukasz [1 ]
Dudek, Dariusz [1 ]
机构
[1] Jagiellonian Univ, Inst Cardiol, 17 Kopernika St, PL-31501 Krakow, Poland
来源
POSTEPY W KARDIOLOGII INTERWENCYJNEJ | 2019年 / 15卷 / 01期
关键词
coronary artery disease; adenosine; fractional flow reserve; borderline lesion; physiology; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; INTRAVENOUS ADENOSINE; FOLLOW-UP; INTRACORONARY; PRESSURE; STENOSIS; SEVERITY; 5'-TRIPHOSPHATE; ANGIOGRAPHY; INDEX;
D O I
10.5114/aic.2019.83652
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Intravenous infusion of adenosine via the femoral vein is commonly used to achieve maximum hyperemia for fractional flow reserve (FFR) assessment in the catheterization laboratory. In the era of transradial access for coronary interventions, obtaining additional venous access with sheath insertion in the groin is unpractical and may be associated with a higher risk of bleeding complications. In a vast majority of cases, patients scheduled for the catheterization laboratory are already equipped with peripheral vein access in antecubital fossa vein. However, only limited data exist to support non-central vein infusion of adenosine instead of the femoral vein for FFR assessment. Aim: To compare infusion of adenosine via a central versus a peripheral vein for the assessment of peak FFR. Material and methods: We enrolled 50 consecutive patients with 125 borderline coronary lesions that were assessed by FFR using adenosine femoral and antecubital vein infusion of 140 mu g/kg/min. Results: Physiological severity assessed with femoral vein adenosine infusion at 140 mu g/kg/min was mean 0.82 +/- 0.09, and with antecubital vein adenosine infusion at 140 mu g/kg/min was 0.82 +/- 0.09. The mean time from initiation of adenosine infusion to maximal stable hyperemia was significantly shorter for 140 mu g/kg/min femoral vein infusion as compared to antecubital vein infusion (49 +/- 19 s vs. 68 +/- 23 s; p < 0.001). There was a strong correlation between FFR values obtained from 140 mu g/kg/min femoral and antecubital vein infusion (r = 0.99; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Antecubital vein adenosine infusion achieved FFR values are very similar to those obtained using femoral vein adenosine administration. However, time to maximal hyperemia is longer with infusion via the antecubital vein.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 58
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effects of Increasing Doses of Intracoronary Adenosine on the Assessment of Fractional Flow Reserve
    De Luca, Giuseppe
    Venegoni, Luca
    Iorio, Sergio
    Giuliani, Livio
    Marino, Paolo
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2011, 4 (10) : 1079 - 1084
  • [42] Comparison of Sodium Nitroprusside and Adenosine for Fractional Flow Reserve Assessment: A systematic review and Meta-Analysis
    Solerno, Raul
    Pedroni, Pablo
    Mariani, Javier
    Sarmiento, Ricardo
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 72 (13) : B218 - B218
  • [43] Comparison of sodium nitroprusside and adenosine for fractional flow reserve assessment: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Solerno, Raul
    Pedroni, Pablo
    Mariani, Javier
    Sarmiento, Ricardo
    EXPERT REVIEW OF CARDIOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2018, 16 (10) : 765 - 770
  • [44] INTRAVENOUS ADENOSINE INFUSION IS SAFE AND WELL TOLERATED DURING CORONARY FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE ASSESSMENT IN SEVERE AORTIC STENOSIS
    Stanojevic, Dusan A.
    Gunasekaran, Prasad
    Levine, Micah
    Reichuber, Mark
    Genton, Randall
    Mehta, Ashwani
    Earnest, Matthew
    Wiley, Mark
    Tadros, Peter
    Dawn, Buddhadeb
    Gupta, Kamal
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 65 (10) : A1931 - A1931
  • [45] Efficacy of coronary fractional flow reserve using contrast medium compared to adenosine
    Topcu, Selim
    Tanboga, Ibrahim Halil
    Aksakal, Enbiya
    Aksu, Ugur
    Gulcu, Oktay
    Birdal, Oguzhan
    Arisoy, Arif
    Kalayci, Arzu
    Ulusoy, Fatih Rifat
    Sevimli, Serdar
    POSTEPY W KARDIOLOGII INTERWENCYJNEJ, 2016, 12 (03): : 212 - 216
  • [46] Efficacy of combined administration of intracoronary papaverine plus intravenous adenosine 5′-triphosphate in assessment of fractional flow reserve
    Nishi, Takeshi
    Kitahara, Hideki
    Iwata, Yo
    Fujimoto, Yoshihide
    Nakayama, Takashi
    Takahara, Masayuki
    Sugimoto, Kazumasa
    Kobayashi, Yoshio
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 68 (5-6) : 512 - 516
  • [47] COMPARATIVE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF ADENOSINE AND REGADENOSON FOR ASSESSMENT OF FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Gill, Gauravpal S.
    Gadre, Akshaya
    Thandra, Abhishek
    Kanmanthareddy, Arun
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 79 (09) : 673 - 673
  • [48] Comparative efficacy and safety of adenosine and regadenoson for assessment of fractional flow reserve: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gill, Gauravpal Singh
    Gadre, Akshaya
    Kanmanthareddy, Arun
    WORLD JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 14 (05): : 319 - 328
  • [49] Comparison of Fractional Flow Reserve with Resting Non-Hyperemic Indices in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease
    Zdzierak, Barbara
    Zasada, Wojciech
    Krawczyk-Ozog, Agata
    Rakowski, Tomasz
    Bartus, Stanislaw
    Surdacki, Andrzej
    Dziewierz, Artur
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR DEVELOPMENT AND DISEASE, 2023, 10 (02)
  • [50] Comparison between fractional flow reserve and visual assessment for moderate coronary artery stenosis
    Karaduman, Bilge Duran
    Akcay, Murat
    Ayhan, Huseyin
    Kasapkara, Haci Ahmet
    Guney, Murat Can
    Durmaz, Tahir
    Keles, Telat
    Bayram, Nihal Akar
    Bilen, Emine
    Bozkurt, Engin
    KARDIOLOGIA POLSKA, 2017, 75 (06) : 545 - 553