Comparison of hyperemic efficacy between femoral and antecubital fossa vein adenosine infusion for fractional flow reserve assessment

被引:10
|
作者
Legutko, Jacek [1 ]
Kleczynski, Pawel [1 ]
Dziewierz, Artur [1 ]
Rzeszutko, Lukasz [1 ]
Dudek, Dariusz [1 ]
机构
[1] Jagiellonian Univ, Inst Cardiol, 17 Kopernika St, PL-31501 Krakow, Poland
来源
POSTEPY W KARDIOLOGII INTERWENCYJNEJ | 2019年 / 15卷 / 01期
关键词
coronary artery disease; adenosine; fractional flow reserve; borderline lesion; physiology; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; INTRAVENOUS ADENOSINE; FOLLOW-UP; INTRACORONARY; PRESSURE; STENOSIS; SEVERITY; 5'-TRIPHOSPHATE; ANGIOGRAPHY; INDEX;
D O I
10.5114/aic.2019.83652
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Intravenous infusion of adenosine via the femoral vein is commonly used to achieve maximum hyperemia for fractional flow reserve (FFR) assessment in the catheterization laboratory. In the era of transradial access for coronary interventions, obtaining additional venous access with sheath insertion in the groin is unpractical and may be associated with a higher risk of bleeding complications. In a vast majority of cases, patients scheduled for the catheterization laboratory are already equipped with peripheral vein access in antecubital fossa vein. However, only limited data exist to support non-central vein infusion of adenosine instead of the femoral vein for FFR assessment. Aim: To compare infusion of adenosine via a central versus a peripheral vein for the assessment of peak FFR. Material and methods: We enrolled 50 consecutive patients with 125 borderline coronary lesions that were assessed by FFR using adenosine femoral and antecubital vein infusion of 140 mu g/kg/min. Results: Physiological severity assessed with femoral vein adenosine infusion at 140 mu g/kg/min was mean 0.82 +/- 0.09, and with antecubital vein adenosine infusion at 140 mu g/kg/min was 0.82 +/- 0.09. The mean time from initiation of adenosine infusion to maximal stable hyperemia was significantly shorter for 140 mu g/kg/min femoral vein infusion as compared to antecubital vein infusion (49 +/- 19 s vs. 68 +/- 23 s; p < 0.001). There was a strong correlation between FFR values obtained from 140 mu g/kg/min femoral and antecubital vein infusion (r = 0.99; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Antecubital vein adenosine infusion achieved FFR values are very similar to those obtained using femoral vein adenosine administration. However, time to maximal hyperemia is longer with infusion via the antecubital vein.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 58
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Feasibility and safety of intracoronary nicorandil infusion as a novel hyperemic agent for fractional flow reserve measurements
    Daiki Kato
    Hiroaki Takashima
    Katsuhisa Waseda
    Akiyoshi Kurita
    Yasuo Kuroda
    Takashi Kosaka
    Yasushi Kuhara
    Hirohiko Ando
    Kazuyuki Maeda
    Soichiro Kumagai
    Shinichiro Sakurai
    Akihiro Suzuki
    Yukiko Toda
    Atsushi Watanabe
    Shigeko Sato
    Masanobu Fujimoto
    Tomofumi Mizuno
    Tetsuya Amano
    Heart and Vessels, 2015, 30 : 477 - 483
  • [22] Comparison of diagnostic performance between quantitative flow ratio, non-hyperemic pressure indices and fractional flow reserve
    Mehta, Ojas Hrakesh
    Hay, Michael
    Lim, Ren Yik
    Ihdayhid, Abdul Rahman
    Michail, Michael
    Zhang, Jun Michael
    Cameron, James D.
    Wong, Dennis T. L.
    CARDIOVASCULAR DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 2020, 10 (03) : 442 - 452
  • [23] Feasibility of additional intracoronary adenosine administration on top of standard intravenous adenosine infusion for assessment of coronary fractional flow reserve
    Oh, J. -H.
    Kim, B. W.
    Park, J. S.
    Choi, J. H.
    Ahn, J. H.
    Lee, H. W.
    Choi, J. H.
    Lee, H. C.
    Cha, K. S.
    Hong, T. J.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2016, 37 : 868 - 869
  • [24] Comparison of Intravenous Adenosine Infusion and Regadenoson Bolus for Calculating Fractional Flow Reserve: Results of a Pooled Analysis
    Stolker, Joshua M.
    Guzman, Luis
    Zenni, Martin M.
    Angiolillo, Dominick
    Bass, Theodore
    Kennedy, Kevin F.
    Lim, Michael
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 62 (18) : B190 - B190
  • [25] Validation and comparison of non-hyperemic pressure reserve to fractional flow reserve for assessment of coronary artery stenosis: A real world study
    Aoun, Joe
    Lahsaei, Saba
    Zahm, Caroline
    Bhat, Tariq
    Carrozza, Joseph P.
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2019, 93 (02) : 250 - 255
  • [26] Fractional Flow Reserve in the Transradial Era: Will Hand Vein Adenosine Infusion Suffice? A Comparative Study of the Extent, Rapidity, and Stability of Hyperemia From Hand and Femoral Venous Routes of Adenosine Administration
    Scott, Peter
    Sirker, Alex
    Dworakowski, Rafal
    Paul, Gideon
    Candilio, Luciano
    Jahagirdar, Nishat
    Melikian, Narbeh
    Byrne, Jonathan
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2015, 8 (04) : 527 - 535
  • [27] Efficacy and Safety of High-Dose Intracoronary Adenosine Injection in Fractional Flow Reserve Assessment
    Jong, Chien -Boon
    Liao, Min-Tsun
    Lu, Tsui -Shan
    Meng, Shih-Wei
    Chen, Chun -Kai
    Tsai, Ya-Chin
    Kuo, Jui-Cheng
    Wu, Chih-Cheng
    ACTA CARDIOLOGICA SINICA, 2022, 38 (05) : 553 - 563
  • [28] Comparison of efficacy and safety of intracoronary sodium nitroprusside and intravenous adenosine for assessing fractional flow reserve
    Rudzinski, Wojciech
    Waller, Alfonso H.
    Rusovici, Arthur
    Dehnee, Abed
    Nasur, Ali
    Benz, Michael
    Sanchez, Salvador
    Klapholz, Marc
    Kaluski, Edo
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2013, 81 (03) : 540 - 544
  • [29] Assessment of increasing intravenous adenosine dose in fractional flow reserve
    Sparv, David
    Gotberg, Matthias
    Harnek, Jan
    Persson, Tobias
    Hardig, Bjarne Madsen
    Erlinge, David
    BMC CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS, 2017, 17
  • [30] Fractional flow reserve assessment with adenosine: Be aware of the QT interval
    Marti, David
    Jose Morales, Maria
    Alvarez, Salvador
    Palazuelos, Jorge
    Rada, Ignacio
    REVISTA PORTUGUESA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2017, 36 (01) : 65 - 66